Physical Exercise for Healthy Older Adults and Those with Frailty: What Exercise Is Best and Is There a Difference? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.

Q2 Medicine
Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research Pub Date : 2024-07-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/5639004
Samaher Alowaydhah, Ishanka Weerasekara, Sarah Walmsley, Jodie Marquez
{"title":"Physical Exercise for Healthy Older Adults and Those with Frailty: What Exercise Is Best and Is There a Difference? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.","authors":"Samaher Alowaydhah, Ishanka Weerasekara, Sarah Walmsley, Jodie Marquez","doi":"10.1155/2024/5639004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Methods: </strong>All English studies published after 1989 with a controlled design, investigating <i>PE</i> <i>in</i> <i>adults</i> 65 years and over were considered if the study design compared PE to a nonexercise control group. Health-related outcomes included physical, cognitive, and psychological function. Studies that investigated cardiorespiratory disease and used designs like systematic review were excluded. <i>Results and Discussion</i>. Altogether, 57 studies were included of which 38 had data that were useable for meta-analysis. In the healthy aged, a significant benefit of multicomponent exercises (<i>p</i>=0.006, SMD = 1.40, CI = 0.41, 2.40) and tai chi (<i>p</i>=0.01, MD = 0.51, CI = 0.12, 0.91) on physical function was revealed, while strength exercise benefitted cognitive function (<i>p</i>=0.04, SMD = 0.86, CI = 0.03, 1.68). In frail older adults, there was a significant benefit of multicomponent exercises on physical function (<i>p</i> < 0.0001, SMD = -10.85, CI = 5.66, 16.04) and mental health (<i>p</i>=0.0002, SMD = -0.39, CI=-0.18, 0.59). Strength exercise had a significant benefit on activity of daily living (ADL) (<i>p</i> < 0.0003, SMD = 15.78, CI = 7.28, 24.28).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The substantial disparity of research in the field of exercise in older adults renders synthesis of the evidence problematic. However, it appears that multicomponent exercise is the most suitable approach for both healthy and frail older adults although the benefit may be reflected in different health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":39066,"journal":{"name":"Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research","volume":"2024 ","pages":"5639004"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11458270/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5639004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Methods: All English studies published after 1989 with a controlled design, investigating PEinadults 65 years and over were considered if the study design compared PE to a nonexercise control group. Health-related outcomes included physical, cognitive, and psychological function. Studies that investigated cardiorespiratory disease and used designs like systematic review were excluded. Results and Discussion. Altogether, 57 studies were included of which 38 had data that were useable for meta-analysis. In the healthy aged, a significant benefit of multicomponent exercises (p=0.006, SMD = 1.40, CI = 0.41, 2.40) and tai chi (p=0.01, MD = 0.51, CI = 0.12, 0.91) on physical function was revealed, while strength exercise benefitted cognitive function (p=0.04, SMD = 0.86, CI = 0.03, 1.68). In frail older adults, there was a significant benefit of multicomponent exercises on physical function (p < 0.0001, SMD = -10.85, CI = 5.66, 16.04) and mental health (p=0.0002, SMD = -0.39, CI=-0.18, 0.59). Strength exercise had a significant benefit on activity of daily living (ADL) (p < 0.0003, SMD = 15.78, CI = 7.28, 24.28).

Conclusion: The substantial disparity of research in the field of exercise in older adults renders synthesis of the evidence problematic. However, it appears that multicomponent exercise is the most suitable approach for both healthy and frail older adults although the benefit may be reflected in different health outcomes.

健康老年人和体弱老年人的体育锻炼:什么运动最好,有区别吗?系统回顾与元分析》。
研究方法:将 1989 年后发表的所有对 65 岁及以上成年人进行体育锻炼的对照研究作为研究对象,只要这些研究将体育锻炼与非锻炼对照组进行了比较。健康相关结果包括身体、认知和心理功能。排除了调查心肺疾病和使用系统回顾等设计的研究。结果与讨论。共纳入了 57 项研究,其中 38 项研究的数据可用于荟萃分析。在健康的老年人中,多组分运动(p=0.006,SMD = 1.40,CI = 0.41,2.40)和太极拳(p=0.01,MD = 0.51,CI = 0.12,0.91)对身体功能有显著益处,而力量锻炼对认知功能有益处(p=0.04,SMD = 0.86,CI = 0.03,1.68)。在体弱老年人中,多组分运动对身体功能(p < 0.0001,SMD = -10.85,CI = 5.66,16.04)和心理健康(p=0.0002,SMD = -0.39,CI =-0.18,0.59)有显著益处。力量锻炼对日常生活活动(ADL)有明显益处(p < 0.0003,SMD = 15.78,CI = 7.28,24.28):老年人运动领域的研究存在巨大差异,因此很难对证据进行综合。然而,多成分运动似乎是最适合健康和体弱老年人的方法,尽管其益处可能体现在不同的健康结果上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research
Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信