Police legitimacy and procedural justice for children and youth: a scoping review of definitions, determinants, and consequences.

IF 2 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Frontiers in Sociology Pub Date : 2024-09-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2024.1409080
Jessica C M Li, Serena Y Zhang, Ivan Y Sun, Albert S K Ho
{"title":"Police legitimacy and procedural justice for children and youth: a scoping review of definitions, determinants, and consequences.","authors":"Jessica C M Li, Serena Y Zhang, Ivan Y Sun, Albert S K Ho","doi":"10.3389/fsoc.2024.1409080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Understanding police legitimacy among children and youth is important for building a just and democratic society. Although the volume of studies on police legitimacy among underaged persons has grown in recent decades, the findings on the relationships between police legitimacy and procedural justice and their definitions, associated determinants, and consequences remain heterogeneous across studies and across political and legal contexts. Given these heterogeneities, the conclusions and implications generated by this research are far from comprehensive.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This scoping review offers readers a comprehensive and comparative understanding of this topic by answering the following questions. (1) How can we <i>define</i> police legitimacy and procedural justice for children and youth? (2) What are the <i>determinants</i> of police procedural justice and legitimacy for children and youth? (3) What are the <i>consequences</i> of police procedural (in)justice and (il)legitimacy for children and youth? (4) Among children and youth, who are the <i>vulnerable groups</i> receiving less legitimate and unjust treatment from the police? A scoping review of the literature published between January 1, 1990 and May 31, 2022 was conducted based on four databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest. Guided by the scoping review screening framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley, that is, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, and the checklist provided by the Joanna Briggs Institute for quality assessment, 47 publications, consisting of 38 quantitative studies and 9 qualitative studies, were retained in the final sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results synthesize the operational and subjective interpretations of police legitimacy offered by the respondents in the studies reviewed which is followed by the discussion of conceptual and measurement issues. The key correlates of police legitimacy identified in these studies were police procedural justice and behavior, followed by experience and contact with the police, relationships with other authority figures, and personal competence in moral reasoning and self-control. In addition to compliance and cooperation, cynicism, trust, and health were related to police (il)legitimacy.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We argue that in addition to building and maintaining police legitimacy, it is vital to remedy the negative consequences of injustice in police-youth encounters.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2024-9-0064/, INPLASY202490064.</p>","PeriodicalId":36297,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sociology","volume":"9 ","pages":"1409080"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11461445/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1409080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Understanding police legitimacy among children and youth is important for building a just and democratic society. Although the volume of studies on police legitimacy among underaged persons has grown in recent decades, the findings on the relationships between police legitimacy and procedural justice and their definitions, associated determinants, and consequences remain heterogeneous across studies and across political and legal contexts. Given these heterogeneities, the conclusions and implications generated by this research are far from comprehensive.

Method: This scoping review offers readers a comprehensive and comparative understanding of this topic by answering the following questions. (1) How can we define police legitimacy and procedural justice for children and youth? (2) What are the determinants of police procedural justice and legitimacy for children and youth? (3) What are the consequences of police procedural (in)justice and (il)legitimacy for children and youth? (4) Among children and youth, who are the vulnerable groups receiving less legitimate and unjust treatment from the police? A scoping review of the literature published between January 1, 1990 and May 31, 2022 was conducted based on four databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest. Guided by the scoping review screening framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley, that is, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, and the checklist provided by the Joanna Briggs Institute for quality assessment, 47 publications, consisting of 38 quantitative studies and 9 qualitative studies, were retained in the final sample.

Results: The results synthesize the operational and subjective interpretations of police legitimacy offered by the respondents in the studies reviewed which is followed by the discussion of conceptual and measurement issues. The key correlates of police legitimacy identified in these studies were police procedural justice and behavior, followed by experience and contact with the police, relationships with other authority figures, and personal competence in moral reasoning and self-control. In addition to compliance and cooperation, cynicism, trust, and health were related to police (il)legitimacy.

Discussion: We argue that in addition to building and maintaining police legitimacy, it is vital to remedy the negative consequences of injustice in police-youth encounters.

Systematic review registration: https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2024-9-0064/, INPLASY202490064.

警察对儿童和青少年的合法性和程序正义:对定义、决定因素和后果的范围审查。
导言:了解警察在儿童和青少年中的合法性对于建设一个公正和民主的社会非常重要。尽管近几十年来关于警察在未成年人中的合法性的研究数量不断增加,但关于警察合法性与程序正义之间的关系及其定义、相关决定因素和后果的研究结果,在不同的研究以及不同的政治和法律背景下仍然存在差异。鉴于这些差异,本研究得出的结论和影响远非全面:本范围界定综述通过回答以下问题,为读者提供对这一主题的全面和比较性理解。(1) 我们如何定义警察对儿童和青少年的合法性和程序正义? (2) 警察对儿童和青少年的程序正义和合法性的决定因素是什么? (3) 警察程序(不)正义和(不)合法性对儿童和青少年的后果是什么? (4) 在儿童和青少年中,哪些弱势群体受到警察较不合法和不公正的对待?我们基于四个数据库,对 1990 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 5 月 31 日期间发表的文献进行了范围界定:PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus 和 ProQuest。在 Arksey 和 O'Malley 提出的范围综述筛选框架(即系统综述和 Meta 分析指南的首选报告项目)以及 Joanna Briggs 研究所提供的质量评估清单的指导下,47 篇出版物被保留在最终样本中,其中包括 38 篇定量研究和 9 篇定性研究:研究结果综合了受访者在所审查的研究中对警察合法性的操作和主观解释,随后讨论了概念和测量问题。在这些研究中,警察合法性的主要相关因素是警察的程序正义和行为,其次是经验和与警察的接触、与其他权威人士的关系,以及个人在道德推理和自我控制方面的能力。除了服从与合作之外,犬儒主义、信任和健康也与警察(不)合法性有关:我们认为,除了建立和维护警察的合法性之外,在警察与青少年的接触中纠正不公正的负面影响也至关重要。系统综述注册:https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2024-9-0064/, INPLASY202490064。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Sociology
Frontiers in Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信