Superior survival after unrelated allogeneic stem cell transplantation with low-dose ATG compared to low-dose TBI in myeloablative fludarabine/busulfan-based regimen for MDS on behalf of the adult MDS Working Group of the JSTCT.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Machiko Fujioka, Hidehiro Itonaga, Hideyuki Nakazawa, Tetsuya Nishida, Keisuke Kataoka, Takashi Ikeda, Shinichi Kako, Ken-Ichi Matsuoka, Koji Adachi, Shini-Chiro Fujiwara, Nobuyuki Aotsuka, Toshiro Kawakita, Emiko Sakaida, Yoshinobu Kanda, Tatsuo Ichinohe, Yoshiko Atsuta, Yasushi Miyazaki, Ken Ishiyama
{"title":"Superior survival after unrelated allogeneic stem cell transplantation with low-dose ATG compared to low-dose TBI in myeloablative fludarabine/busulfan-based regimen for MDS on behalf of the adult MDS Working Group of the JSTCT.","authors":"Machiko Fujioka, Hidehiro Itonaga, Hideyuki Nakazawa, Tetsuya Nishida, Keisuke Kataoka, Takashi Ikeda, Shinichi Kako, Ken-Ichi Matsuoka, Koji Adachi, Shini-Chiro Fujiwara, Nobuyuki Aotsuka, Toshiro Kawakita, Emiko Sakaida, Yoshinobu Kanda, Tatsuo Ichinohe, Yoshiko Atsuta, Yasushi Miyazaki, Ken Ishiyama","doi":"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.09.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The fludarabine/intravenous busulfan 12.8 mg/kg (FB4) regimen is an effective conditioning regimen in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS); however, limited data is available on the prognostic impact of FB4 with low-dose anti-thymoglobulin (ATG ≤ 5 mg/kg) or low-dose total body irradiation (TBI ≤ 4 Gy). Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated the outcomes in 280 adults with de novo MDS who underwent their first transplantation from an unrelated donor between 2009 and 2018. Median age was 61 years (range, 16 to 70 years). In the FB4 alone (FB4), FB4 plus ATG (FB4-ATG), and FB4 plus TBI (FB4-TBI) groups, 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 39.9, 64.8, and 43.7 %; 3-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 32.1, 22.1, and 27.1%; and 3-year relapse incidences were 34.7, 21.2, and 28.9%, respectively. The multivariate analyses showed that FB4-ATG group significantly correlated with better OS (hazard Ratio [HR], 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-0.95; P=0.032) than FB4 group. FB4-ATG group tended to correlate with lower NRM (HR, 0.36;95% CI, 0.13-1.06; P=0.063) than FB4 group. In comparison with FB4-TBI group, FB4-ATG group showed better OS (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.27-0.99, P=0.049) and NRM (HR 0.034, 95% CI 0.11-0.92, P=0.034). No significant differences were observed in OS and NRM between the FB4-TBI and FB4 groups. The present study demonstrated that the FB4 plus low-dose ATG regimen improved OS and NRM, but FB4 plus low-dose TBI regimen had no clear benefit over FB4 alone, in MDS patients who used unrelated donors.</p>","PeriodicalId":23283,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtct.2024.09.026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fludarabine/intravenous busulfan 12.8 mg/kg (FB4) regimen is an effective conditioning regimen in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS); however, limited data is available on the prognostic impact of FB4 with low-dose anti-thymoglobulin (ATG ≤ 5 mg/kg) or low-dose total body irradiation (TBI ≤ 4 Gy). Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated the outcomes in 280 adults with de novo MDS who underwent their first transplantation from an unrelated donor between 2009 and 2018. Median age was 61 years (range, 16 to 70 years). In the FB4 alone (FB4), FB4 plus ATG (FB4-ATG), and FB4 plus TBI (FB4-TBI) groups, 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 39.9, 64.8, and 43.7 %; 3-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 32.1, 22.1, and 27.1%; and 3-year relapse incidences were 34.7, 21.2, and 28.9%, respectively. The multivariate analyses showed that FB4-ATG group significantly correlated with better OS (hazard Ratio [HR], 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-0.95; P=0.032) than FB4 group. FB4-ATG group tended to correlate with lower NRM (HR, 0.36;95% CI, 0.13-1.06; P=0.063) than FB4 group. In comparison with FB4-TBI group, FB4-ATG group showed better OS (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.27-0.99, P=0.049) and NRM (HR 0.034, 95% CI 0.11-0.92, P=0.034). No significant differences were observed in OS and NRM between the FB4-TBI and FB4 groups. The present study demonstrated that the FB4 plus low-dose ATG regimen improved OS and NRM, but FB4 plus low-dose TBI regimen had no clear benefit over FB4 alone, in MDS patients who used unrelated donors.

在基于氟达拉滨/布磺凡的髓鞘消融治疗MDS方案中,与低剂量TBI相比,使用低剂量ATG进行非亲属异基因干细胞移植后的存活率更高。
在骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)的异基因造血干细胞移植中,氟达拉滨/静脉注射12.8 mg/kg(FB4)方案是一种有效的调理方案;然而,关于FB4与低剂量抗胸腺球蛋白(ATG ≤ 5 mg/kg)或低剂量全身照射(TBI ≤ 4 Gy)对预后影响的数据却很有限。因此,我们回顾性评估了2009年至2018年期间首次接受非亲属供体移植的280例成人新发MDS患者的治疗效果。中位年龄为61岁(16至70岁)。在单用FB4组(FB4)、FB4加ATG组(FB4-ATG)和FB4加TBI组(FB4-TBI)中,3年总生存率(OS)分别为39.9%、64.8%和43.7%;3年非复发死亡率(NRM)分别为32.1%、22.1%和27.1%;3年复发率分别为34.7%、21.2%和28.9%。多变量分析显示,与FB4组相比,FB4-ATG组与更好的OS显著相关(危险比[HR],0.51;95%置信区间[CI],0.27-0.95;P=0.032)。与 FB4 组相比,FB4-ATG 组往往与较低的 NRM 相关(HR,0.36;95% CI,0.13-1.06;P=0.063)。与 FB4-TBI 组相比,FB4-ATG 组显示出更好的 OS(HR 0.52,95% CI 0.27-0.99,P=0.049)和 NRM(HR 0.034,95% CI 0.11-0.92,P=0.034)。FB4-TBI组和FB4组在OS和NRM方面未观察到明显差异。本研究表明,在使用非亲属供体的MDS患者中,FB4加小剂量ATG方案可改善OS和NRM,但FB4加小剂量TBI方案与单用FB4相比无明显益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
15.60%
发文量
1061
审稿时长
51 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信