Neonatal Noninvasive Ventilation Nasal Mask Interface Pressure and the Inter-Individual Variation of Mask Placement.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Anne D Zakrajsek, Lissy Kesterson, Marty O Visscher, Vivek Narendran, Orlando S Hoilett, Eric A Nauman
{"title":"Neonatal Noninvasive Ventilation Nasal Mask Interface Pressure and the Inter-Individual Variation of Mask Placement.","authors":"Anne D Zakrajsek, Lissy Kesterson, Marty O Visscher, Vivek Narendran, Orlando S Hoilett, Eric A Nauman","doi":"10.4187/respcare.12217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 2014 American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation for CPAP as an alternative to mechanical ventilation for treatment of neonatal respiratory distress prompted a rapid shift to noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Since most patients receive nasal bubble CPAP (a form of NIV), a concomitant increase in nasal pressure injuries followed. This prospective observational study aims to develop strategies to reduce nasal mask pressure injury in neonates by 1.) quantifying CPAP mask-interface pressure and 2.) assessing placement variability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 1F MEMS Connect pressure sensor (Millar®) was modified for contact pressure measurements with silicone embedding and calibrated. The CPAP generator and interface components were sized for a 24-week neonatal simulator. Thirteen neonatal ICU staff placed the simulator on CPAP at 6 cmH<sub>2</sub>O and 8 L/min of flow with no humidification. Pressure was measured at three locations (the forehead, nasal bridge, and philtrum) in triplicate (three measurements per site). Descriptive statistics, a location-specific, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a Tukey post hoc test, and a two-sample paired <i>t</i>-test of the means of the first and last triplicate were performed (Minitab, LLC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pressure ranged from 12.3 to 377.3 mmHg. The mean (SD) interface pressure at the philtrum was significantly higher than both the nasal bridge and the forehead (philtrum: 173.9 (101.3), nasal bridge: 67.79 (28.9), and forehead 79.02 (36.87), <i>p</i> ˂ 0.001). CPAP fixation varied, including bonnet placement, trunk angle, mask compression, use of hook and loop extenders, and level of vigorous bubble feedback achieved.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study developed a modified pressure sensor for quantifying the pressure exerted by a nasal mask on facial skin. Maximum pressures were higher than those previously reported. Inter-individual differences were present in both quantitative and qualitative measures of pressure. Reduction of NIV-associated pressure injuries may be achieved through NIV fixation technique training and improved nasal mask stability and size increments.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.12217","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The 2014 American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation for CPAP as an alternative to mechanical ventilation for treatment of neonatal respiratory distress prompted a rapid shift to noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Since most patients receive nasal bubble CPAP (a form of NIV), a concomitant increase in nasal pressure injuries followed. This prospective observational study aims to develop strategies to reduce nasal mask pressure injury in neonates by 1.) quantifying CPAP mask-interface pressure and 2.) assessing placement variability.

Methods: A 1F MEMS Connect pressure sensor (Millar®) was modified for contact pressure measurements with silicone embedding and calibrated. The CPAP generator and interface components were sized for a 24-week neonatal simulator. Thirteen neonatal ICU staff placed the simulator on CPAP at 6 cmH2O and 8 L/min of flow with no humidification. Pressure was measured at three locations (the forehead, nasal bridge, and philtrum) in triplicate (three measurements per site). Descriptive statistics, a location-specific, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a Tukey post hoc test, and a two-sample paired t-test of the means of the first and last triplicate were performed (Minitab, LLC).

Results: Pressure ranged from 12.3 to 377.3 mmHg. The mean (SD) interface pressure at the philtrum was significantly higher than both the nasal bridge and the forehead (philtrum: 173.9 (101.3), nasal bridge: 67.79 (28.9), and forehead 79.02 (36.87), p ˂ 0.001). CPAP fixation varied, including bonnet placement, trunk angle, mask compression, use of hook and loop extenders, and level of vigorous bubble feedback achieved.

Conclusions: This study developed a modified pressure sensor for quantifying the pressure exerted by a nasal mask on facial skin. Maximum pressures were higher than those previously reported. Inter-individual differences were present in both quantitative and qualitative measures of pressure. Reduction of NIV-associated pressure injuries may be achieved through NIV fixation technique training and improved nasal mask stability and size increments.

新生儿无创通气鼻面罩界面压力和面罩放置的个体差异。
背景:2014 年美国儿科学会建议用 CPAP 代替机械通气治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫,这促使人们迅速转向无创通气 (NIV)。由于大多数患者接受鼻腔气泡式 CPAP(NIV 的一种形式),鼻腔压力损伤随之增加。这项前瞻性观察研究旨在通过以下方法制定减少新生儿鼻罩压力损伤的策略:1)量化 CPAP 面罩-接口压力;2)评估放置的可变性:方法:对 1F MEMS Connect 压力传感器 (Millar®) 进行了改装,以便用硅胶嵌入进行接触压力测量,并进行了校准。CPAP 发生器和接口组件的尺寸是为 24 周新生儿模拟器设计的。13 名新生儿重症监护室的工作人员在不加湿的情况下将模拟器置于 6 cmH2O 和 8 L/min 流量的 CPAP 条件下。在三个位置(前额、鼻梁和咽鼓)测量压力,一式三份(每个位置测量三次)。进行了描述性统计、针对特定位置的单因子方差分析(ANOVA)和 Tukey 后检验,并对第一个和最后一个三联样本的平均值进行了双样本配对 t 检验(Minitab, LLC):压力范围为 12.3 至 377.3 毫米汞柱。咽鼓管界面压力的平均值(标度)明显高于鼻梁和前额(咽鼓管:173.9 (101.3),鼻梁:67.79 (28.9),前额:79.02 (36.87),p ˂ 0.001)。CPAP 固定方式各不相同,包括阀帽位置、躯干角度、面罩压力、钩环扩展器的使用以及气泡反馈的强度:本研究开发了一种改进的压力传感器,用于量化鼻罩对面部皮肤施加的压力。最大压力高于之前报道的压力。压力的定量和定性测量均存在个体差异。通过鼻饲固定技术培训、改善鼻罩的稳定性和尺寸增量,可以减少与鼻饲相关的压力损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信