Exercise-based telerehabilitation for the management of chronic pain in people with severe haemophilia: a mixed-methods feasibility study.

IF 1.5 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Paul McLaughlin, Pratima Chowdary, Kate Khair, Clive Smith, David Stephensen, Michael Hurley
{"title":"Exercise-based telerehabilitation for the management of chronic pain in people with severe haemophilia: a mixed-methods feasibility study.","authors":"Paul McLaughlin, Pratima Chowdary, Kate Khair, Clive Smith, David Stephensen, Michael Hurley","doi":"10.1186/s40814-024-01550-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic pain is reported by between 30 and 71% of people with haemophilia (PWH). Exercise is shown to be effective for pain management in other arthritides, but it remains unclear if such an approach is effective or acceptable to PWH. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a telerehabilitation exercise intervention for PWH living with chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multisite, non-randomised, pre-post feasibility design, with a nested qualitative study. People with severe haemophilia > 18 years, living with chronic pain, were recruited. The intervention comprised 12 low-impact/moderate intensity, individualised exercise sessions and 3 knowledge-sharing and discussion sessions. Primary objectives assessed according to predefined progression criteria were as follows: (a) recruitment rate (5 participants enrolled per site over 8 weeks), (b) adherence (≥ 75% participants would adhere to ≥ 75% of sessions), (c) follow-up rate (≥ 75% completion of self-reported measures), (d) fidelity (intervention delivered as described in protocol) and (e) safety (≤ 30% participants would report adverse events). Acceptability was evaluated from thematic analysis of post-intervention participant interviews. Preliminary evaluation of self-reported pain, function and quality of life (QoL) was a secondary objective. Results were reported using descriptive statistics integrated with qualitative findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten PWH were recruited and completed the intervention. Nine agreed to be interviewed post intervention. Attendance at individual sessions was 84.5% compared to 52.1% for the group sessions. Outcome measures were successfully completed for 100% at baseline, 70% at intervention end and 60% at 3-month follow-up. No serious adverse events were recorded. Group median values in outcome measures (pain, function, QoL) showed minimal change post intervention. Participant interviews highlighted high levels of enjoyment, confidence in continuing exercises independently and positive views of virtual delivery and condition-specific exercise.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recruitment rate and safety met the predefined progression criteria. Fidelity partially met the progression criteria, but the follow-up rate for self-reported measures did not. The study was acceptable to both participants and physiotherapists. Further intervention development is needed to review approaches to outcome measure collection and refine the usefulness of the knowledge-sharing sessions.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was prospectively registered on 9 July 2021: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number ISRCTN 17454597.</p>","PeriodicalId":20176,"journal":{"name":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","volume":"10 1","pages":"128"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11460162/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-024-01550-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic pain is reported by between 30 and 71% of people with haemophilia (PWH). Exercise is shown to be effective for pain management in other arthritides, but it remains unclear if such an approach is effective or acceptable to PWH. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a telerehabilitation exercise intervention for PWH living with chronic pain.

Methods: This was a multisite, non-randomised, pre-post feasibility design, with a nested qualitative study. People with severe haemophilia > 18 years, living with chronic pain, were recruited. The intervention comprised 12 low-impact/moderate intensity, individualised exercise sessions and 3 knowledge-sharing and discussion sessions. Primary objectives assessed according to predefined progression criteria were as follows: (a) recruitment rate (5 participants enrolled per site over 8 weeks), (b) adherence (≥ 75% participants would adhere to ≥ 75% of sessions), (c) follow-up rate (≥ 75% completion of self-reported measures), (d) fidelity (intervention delivered as described in protocol) and (e) safety (≤ 30% participants would report adverse events). Acceptability was evaluated from thematic analysis of post-intervention participant interviews. Preliminary evaluation of self-reported pain, function and quality of life (QoL) was a secondary objective. Results were reported using descriptive statistics integrated with qualitative findings.

Results: Ten PWH were recruited and completed the intervention. Nine agreed to be interviewed post intervention. Attendance at individual sessions was 84.5% compared to 52.1% for the group sessions. Outcome measures were successfully completed for 100% at baseline, 70% at intervention end and 60% at 3-month follow-up. No serious adverse events were recorded. Group median values in outcome measures (pain, function, QoL) showed minimal change post intervention. Participant interviews highlighted high levels of enjoyment, confidence in continuing exercises independently and positive views of virtual delivery and condition-specific exercise.

Conclusions: Recruitment rate and safety met the predefined progression criteria. Fidelity partially met the progression criteria, but the follow-up rate for self-reported measures did not. The study was acceptable to both participants and physiotherapists. Further intervention development is needed to review approaches to outcome measure collection and refine the usefulness of the knowledge-sharing sessions.

Trial registration: The study was prospectively registered on 9 July 2021: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number ISRCTN 17454597.

以运动为基础的远程康复治疗重度血友病患者的慢性疼痛:一项混合方法可行性研究。
背景:血友病患者(PWH)中有 30% 至 71% 报告患有慢性疼痛。运动对其他关节炎患者的疼痛控制有效,但这种方法对血友病患者是否有效或是否可接受仍不清楚。本研究旨在评估对患有慢性疼痛的残疾人进行远程康复锻炼干预的可行性和可接受性:这是一项多地点、非随机、前-后可行性设计,并包含一项嵌套定性研究。招募了年龄大于 18 岁、患有慢性疼痛的重度血友病患者。干预措施包括 12 次低强度/中等强度的个性化锻炼课程和 3 次知识分享和讨论课程。根据预先确定的进展标准评估的主要目标如下:(a) 招募率(8 周内每个地点招募 5 名参与者),(b) 坚持率(≥ 75% 的参与者坚持≥ 75% 的课程),(c) 随访率(≥ 75% 的参与者完成自我报告措施),(d) 忠实度(按照方案中的描述进行干预)和 (e) 安全性(≤ 30% 的参与者报告不良事件)。通过对干预后参与者访谈的专题分析,对可接受性进行了评估。初步评估自我报告的疼痛、功能和生活质量(QoL)是次要目标。结果采用描述性统计与定性结果相结合的方式进行报告:结果:共招募了 10 名残疾人并完成了干预。九人同意在干预后接受访谈。个人课程的出席率为 84.5%,而小组课程的出席率为 52.1%。100%的人在基线期、70%的人在干预结束时、60%的人在3个月的随访中成功完成了结果测量。没有严重不良事件的记录。干预后,结果测量(疼痛、功能、生活质量)的小组中值变化很小。对参与者的访谈显示,他们非常喜欢并有信心独立继续锻炼,并对虚拟教学和针对具体情况的锻炼持积极态度:结论:招募率和安全性符合预定的进展标准。保真度部分符合进展标准,但自我报告措施的随访率不符合标准。参与者和物理治疗师都能接受这项研究。需要进一步开发干预措施,审查结果测量收集方法,并完善知识分享会的实用性:该研究于 2021 年 7 月 9 日进行了前瞻性注册:国际标准随机对照试验编号为 ISRCTN 17454597。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Pilot and Feasibility Studies Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
241
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Pilot and Feasibility Studies encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of pilot and feasibility studies in biomedicine. The journal publishes research articles that are intended to directly influence future clinical trials or large scale observational studies, as well as protocols, commentaries and methodology articles. The journal also ensures that the results of all well-conducted, peer-reviewed, pilot and feasibility studies are published, regardless of outcome or significance of findings. Pilot and feasibility studies are increasingly conducted prior to a full randomized controlled trial. However, these studies often lack clear objectives, many remain unpublished, and there is confusion over the meanings of the words “pilot” and “feasibility”. Pilot and Feasibility Studies provides a forum for discussion around this key aspect of the scientific process, and seeks to ensure that these studies are published, so as to complete the publication thread for clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信