The Impact of Hormone Replacement Therapy on the Risk of Heart Failure in Postmenopausal Women: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Observational Studies.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Mehmet Emin Arayici, Mustafa Eray Kilic, Mehmet Birhan Yilmaz
{"title":"The Impact of Hormone Replacement Therapy on the Risk of Heart Failure in Postmenopausal Women: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Observational Studies.","authors":"Mehmet Emin Arayici, Mustafa Eray Kilic, Mehmet Birhan Yilmaz","doi":"10.1002/pds.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The relationship between heart failure (HF) and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women remains unclear. This paper aimed to elucidate the association between HRT and HF outcomes in postmenopausal women by scrutinizing evidence from clinical trials and observational studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The meta-analysis was systematically executed following the PRISMA guidelines to include studies identified from the electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, EBSCO, ICTRP, and NIH clinical trials. The primary endpoint of the effect comprised risk ratios (RR) for HF incidence and mortality, attended by 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The risk of bias was assessed employing the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool for clinical trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded a total of eight reports, originating from six individual studies, for inclusion in the current study, and 25 047 participants were included. The meta-analysis demonstrated no remarkable association between HRT and the incidence of HF in postmenopausal women (RR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.91-1.25, p = 0.37). However, a significant reduction in all-cause mortality was observed among post-menopausal HF patients who received HRT (RR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.49-0.87, p = 0.003). In age-related subgroup analyses, no significant change in the risk of HF was noticed among participants on HRT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this paper demonstrate that HRT use is not associated with a significant increase in the risk of incident HF. This meta-analysis also suggests a benefit in all-cause mortality when HRT is administered to postmenopausal women with HF.</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"33 10","pages":"e70029"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The relationship between heart failure (HF) and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women remains unclear. This paper aimed to elucidate the association between HRT and HF outcomes in postmenopausal women by scrutinizing evidence from clinical trials and observational studies.

Methods: The meta-analysis was systematically executed following the PRISMA guidelines to include studies identified from the electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, EBSCO, ICTRP, and NIH clinical trials. The primary endpoint of the effect comprised risk ratios (RR) for HF incidence and mortality, attended by 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The risk of bias was assessed employing the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool for clinical trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational studies.

Results: The search yielded a total of eight reports, originating from six individual studies, for inclusion in the current study, and 25 047 participants were included. The meta-analysis demonstrated no remarkable association between HRT and the incidence of HF in postmenopausal women (RR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.91-1.25, p = 0.37). However, a significant reduction in all-cause mortality was observed among post-menopausal HF patients who received HRT (RR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.49-0.87, p = 0.003). In age-related subgroup analyses, no significant change in the risk of HF was noticed among participants on HRT.

Conclusions: The findings of this paper demonstrate that HRT use is not associated with a significant increase in the risk of incident HF. This meta-analysis also suggests a benefit in all-cause mortality when HRT is administered to postmenopausal women with HF.

激素替代疗法对绝经后妇女心力衰竭风险的影响:临床和观察性研究的元分析》。
目的:绝经后妇女心力衰竭(HF)与激素替代疗法(HRT)之间的关系仍不清楚。本文旨在通过仔细研究来自临床试验和观察性研究的证据,阐明绝经后女性激素替代疗法与心力衰竭结果之间的关系:方法:按照 PRISMA 指南系统地进行了荟萃分析,纳入了从电子数据库(包括 PubMed、EMBASE、EBSCO、ICTRP 和 NIH 临床试验)中确定的研究。研究效果的主要终点包括心房颤动发病率和死亡率的风险比(RR),以及 95% 的置信区间(CI)。临床试验采用 Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) 工具评估偏倚风险,观察性研究采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表 (NOS) 评估偏倚风险:搜索结果显示,共有来自六项单独研究的八份报告被纳入本研究,25 047 名参与者被纳入本研究。荟萃分析表明,HRT 与绝经后妇女心房颤动发病率之间没有明显的关联(RR:1.07,95% CI:0.91-1.25,P = 0.37)。然而,在接受了 HRT 的绝经后高血压患者中,观察到全因死亡率明显降低(RR:0.65,95% CI:0.49-0.87,p = 0.003)。在与年龄相关的亚组分析中,接受HRT的参与者患高血压的风险没有明显变化:本文的研究结果表明,HRT 的使用与心房颤动发病风险的显著增加无关。这项荟萃分析还表明,对患有心房颤动的绝经后妇女使用心率变异治疗可降低全因死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
173
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report. Particular areas of interest include: design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology; comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world; methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology; assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy; patterns of drug utilization; relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines; evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信