Exploring Knee Flexion Techniques in Tibial Nailing: A Comparative Study of Two Different Methods Knee Flexion Techniques in Tibial Nailing.

Abstract

Background: Tibial fractures, particularly diaphyseal fractures, are common and can result in prolonged non-weight-bearing periods, especially in older adults. Intramedullary nailing has become the standard treatment, offering early weight-bearing and improved functional outcomes. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of two knee flexion methods - Method A (using an adjustable triangular frame) and Method B (Seyhan method) - in tibial nailing procedures.

Material and methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted with 90 adult patients aged 18-70 requiring intramedullary nailing for isolated closed tibial fractures. Method A utilized an adjustable triangular frame, allowing various degrees of knee flexion. In Method B (Seyhan method), knee flexion was achieved by leg sloping on the operation table with a cushion pillow under the distal thigh.

Results: In terms of complication rates, a key finding was a significantly higher incidence of edema in Method B compared to Method A. The results indicated minor differences in satisfaction levels, with a slightly higher percentage of 'Well Satisfied' and a higher dissatisfaction rate in Method B. However, these variations in surgeon satisfaction did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusions: 1. The Seyhan method and the adjustable triangular frame were compared in our study, with the latter showing advantages in terms of ease of use and reduced complications. 2. While complications like knee pain were observed in some cases, the triangular frame showed superior results in surgical efficiency and patient outcomes. 3. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and explore specific scenarios where each method may excel.