Effect of pharmacist interventions in chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 TRANSPLANTATION
Ashkon Ardavani, Ffion Curtis, Ellen Hopwood, Patrick Highton, Priscilla Katapa, Kamlesh Khunti, Thomas J Wilkinson
{"title":"Effect of pharmacist interventions in chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Ashkon Ardavani, Ffion Curtis, Ellen Hopwood, Patrick Highton, Priscilla Katapa, Kamlesh Khunti, Thomas J Wilkinson","doi":"10.1093/ndt/gfae221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmacists are uniquely placed with their therapeutic knowledge to manage people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Data is limited regarding the impact of pharmacist interventions on economic, clinical, and humanistic outcomes (ECHO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions with pharmacist input was conducted, which included adults with a diagnosis of CKD, including those with and without kidney replacement therapy. Data was extracted on ECHO: economic (e.g. healthcare-associated costs), clinical (e.g. mortality), and humanistic (e.g. patient satisfaction) outcomes. Where appropriate, a random-effects model meta-analysis generated a pooled estimate of effect. A direction of effect plot was used to summarize the overall effects for clinical outcome domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>32 RCTs reported a total of 10 economic, 211 clinical, and 18 humanistic outcomes. Pharmacist interventions resulted in statistically significant improvements in systolic blood pressure and hemoglobin levels, but not in diastolic blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate, creatinine, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Mixed findings were reported for clinical and economic outcomes, whilst pharmacist interventions resulted in an improvement in humanistic outcomes such as patient satisfaction and patient knowledge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings showed pharmacist interventions had mixed results for various outcomes. Future studies should be more robustly designed and take into consideration the role of the pharmacist in prescribing and deprescribing, the findings of which will help inform research and clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19078,"journal":{"name":"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfae221","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pharmacists are uniquely placed with their therapeutic knowledge to manage people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Data is limited regarding the impact of pharmacist interventions on economic, clinical, and humanistic outcomes (ECHO).

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions with pharmacist input was conducted, which included adults with a diagnosis of CKD, including those with and without kidney replacement therapy. Data was extracted on ECHO: economic (e.g. healthcare-associated costs), clinical (e.g. mortality), and humanistic (e.g. patient satisfaction) outcomes. Where appropriate, a random-effects model meta-analysis generated a pooled estimate of effect. A direction of effect plot was used to summarize the overall effects for clinical outcome domains.

Results: 32 RCTs reported a total of 10 economic, 211 clinical, and 18 humanistic outcomes. Pharmacist interventions resulted in statistically significant improvements in systolic blood pressure and hemoglobin levels, but not in diastolic blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate, creatinine, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Mixed findings were reported for clinical and economic outcomes, whilst pharmacist interventions resulted in an improvement in humanistic outcomes such as patient satisfaction and patient knowledge.

Conclusion: Findings showed pharmacist interventions had mixed results for various outcomes. Future studies should be more robustly designed and take into consideration the role of the pharmacist in prescribing and deprescribing, the findings of which will help inform research and clinical practice.

药剂师对慢性肾病的干预效果:一项荟萃分析。
背景:药剂师在管理慢性肾脏病 (CKD) 患者方面具有独特的治疗知识。有关药剂师干预对经济、临床和人文结果(ECHO)的影响的数据十分有限:方法:我们对有药剂师参与的干预措施的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,研究对象包括确诊为慢性肾脏病(CKD)的成年人,包括接受和未接受肾脏替代治疗的患者。研究提取了 ECHO 数据:经济(如医疗相关成本)、临床(如死亡率)和人文(如患者满意度)结果。在适当的情况下,采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,得出集合效应估计值。采用效应方向图总结临床结果领域的总体效应:32 项研究共报告了 10 项经济结果、211 项临床结果和 18 项人文结果。药剂师干预对收缩压和血红蛋白水平的改善具有统计学意义,但对舒张压、估计肾小球滤过率、肌酐和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平的改善不明显。临床和经济结果的报告结果不一,而药剂师干预则改善了患者满意度和患者知识等人文结果:研究结果表明,药剂师干预对各种结果的影响不一。今后的研究应设计得更加合理,并考虑到药剂师在开处方和取消处方中的作用,研究结果将有助于为研究和临床实践提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
1431
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation (ndt) is the leading nephrology journal in Europe and renowned worldwide, devoted to original clinical and laboratory research in nephrology, dialysis and transplantation. ndt is an official journal of the [ERA-EDTA](http://www.era-edta.org/) (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association). Published monthly, the journal provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians throughout the world. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review. Print ISSN: 0931-0509.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信