The role of E-wave velocity in predicting early left ventricular dysfunction and significant decline in left ventricular ejection fraction after mitral valve repair for severe chronic primary mitral regurgitation.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Chanjuan Gong, Takeshi Kinoshita, Masakazu Hayashida, Atsuko Hara, Maho Kakemizu-Watanabe, Sakiko Miyazaki, Minoru Tabata
{"title":"The role of E-wave velocity in predicting early left ventricular dysfunction and significant decline in left ventricular ejection fraction after mitral valve repair for severe chronic primary mitral regurgitation.","authors":"Chanjuan Gong, Takeshi Kinoshita, Masakazu Hayashida, Atsuko Hara, Maho Kakemizu-Watanabe, Sakiko Miyazaki, Minoru Tabata","doi":"10.1007/s00380-024-02468-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Preoperative left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) and LV end-systolic dimension (LVESD) are established predictors of LV dysfunction (LVD) after mitral valve repair (MVr) for mitral regurgitation (MR). Although elevated estimated right ventricular systolic pressure (eRVSP) indicating pulmonary hypertension is the best proposed additional predictor, we hypothesized that transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) parameters more directly reflecting left atrial pressure (LAP) would more accurately predict LVD than eRVSP. Furthermore, predictors of a significant decline in LVEF remain unknown. We retrospectively studied 622 patients, aged 20-87 years, who underwent MVr for severe chronic primary MR. As previously reported predictors of postoperative LVD, we collected seven preoperative TTE parameters, including LVESD, LVEF, eRVSP, LV end-diastolic dimension, left atrial volume index (LAVI), early transmitral annular (e') velocity, and atrial fibrillation. Furthermore, as LAP-related TTE parameters, we collected left atrial dimension, E-wave velocity, and E/e' ratio, in addition to eRVSP and LAVI. Using multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses, we explored predictors of early postoperative LVD, defined as LVEF < 50% measured on postoperative day 7. We further explored predictors of a significant decline in LVEF, defined as an absolute decline in LVEF of > 12 percentage points, the third quintile of the data. Incidences of postoperative LVD and a significant LVEF decline were 12.9% and 23.2%, respectively. In addition to LVESD and LVEF, E-wave velocity, but not eRVSP, remained a significant predictor of postoperative LVD. E-wave velocity, LVESD, and LVEF had additive effects in risk prediction. Furthermore, E-wave velocity was the strongest predictor of a significant LVEF decline. E-wave velocities > 121.5 cm/s and > 101.5 cm/s were associated with increased risks of postoperative LVD (odds ratio [OR], 2.896; 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 1.792-4.681; p < 0.001) and a significant LVEF decline (OR, 6.345; 95%CI, 3.707-10.86; p < 0.001), respectively. After adjustment for multiple TTE parameters, E-wave velocity, but not eRVSP, remained significant predictors of postoperative LVD and a significant LVEF decline after MVr. These results were reproducible in 461 patients who underwent follow-up TTE at 1 year, suggesting an important role of E-wave velocity in risk prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":12940,"journal":{"name":"Heart and Vessels","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart and Vessels","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-024-02468-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preoperative left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) and LV end-systolic dimension (LVESD) are established predictors of LV dysfunction (LVD) after mitral valve repair (MVr) for mitral regurgitation (MR). Although elevated estimated right ventricular systolic pressure (eRVSP) indicating pulmonary hypertension is the best proposed additional predictor, we hypothesized that transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) parameters more directly reflecting left atrial pressure (LAP) would more accurately predict LVD than eRVSP. Furthermore, predictors of a significant decline in LVEF remain unknown. We retrospectively studied 622 patients, aged 20-87 years, who underwent MVr for severe chronic primary MR. As previously reported predictors of postoperative LVD, we collected seven preoperative TTE parameters, including LVESD, LVEF, eRVSP, LV end-diastolic dimension, left atrial volume index (LAVI), early transmitral annular (e') velocity, and atrial fibrillation. Furthermore, as LAP-related TTE parameters, we collected left atrial dimension, E-wave velocity, and E/e' ratio, in addition to eRVSP and LAVI. Using multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses, we explored predictors of early postoperative LVD, defined as LVEF < 50% measured on postoperative day 7. We further explored predictors of a significant decline in LVEF, defined as an absolute decline in LVEF of > 12 percentage points, the third quintile of the data. Incidences of postoperative LVD and a significant LVEF decline were 12.9% and 23.2%, respectively. In addition to LVESD and LVEF, E-wave velocity, but not eRVSP, remained a significant predictor of postoperative LVD. E-wave velocity, LVESD, and LVEF had additive effects in risk prediction. Furthermore, E-wave velocity was the strongest predictor of a significant LVEF decline. E-wave velocities > 121.5 cm/s and > 101.5 cm/s were associated with increased risks of postoperative LVD (odds ratio [OR], 2.896; 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 1.792-4.681; p < 0.001) and a significant LVEF decline (OR, 6.345; 95%CI, 3.707-10.86; p < 0.001), respectively. After adjustment for multiple TTE parameters, E-wave velocity, but not eRVSP, remained significant predictors of postoperative LVD and a significant LVEF decline after MVr. These results were reproducible in 461 patients who underwent follow-up TTE at 1 year, suggesting an important role of E-wave velocity in risk prediction.

二尖瓣修复术治疗严重慢性原发性二尖瓣反流后,E 波速度在预测早期左心室功能障碍和左心室射血分数显著下降方面的作用。
术前左心室射血分数(LVEF)和左心室收缩末期尺寸(LVESD)是二尖瓣反流(MR)二尖瓣修复术(MVr)后左心室功能障碍(LVD)的既定预测指标。尽管显示肺动脉高压的右心室收缩压(eRVSP)估测值升高是最好的额外预测指标,但我们假设,与 eRVSP 相比,更能直接反映左心房压力(LAP)的经胸超声心动图(TTE)参数能更准确地预测 LVD。此外,预测 LVEF 显著下降的因素仍然未知。我们回顾性研究了 622 名因严重慢性原发性 MR 而接受 MVr 的患者,他们的年龄在 20-87 岁之间。与之前报道的术后 LVD 预测因素一样,我们收集了术前七项 TTE 参数,包括 LVESD、LVEF、eRVSP、LV 舒张末期尺寸、左心房容积指数(LAVI)、早期透射瓣环(e')速度和心房颤动。此外,作为与 LAP 相关的 TTE 参数,除 eRVSP 和 LAVI 外,我们还收集了左心房尺寸、E 波速度和 E/e' 比值。通过多变量逻辑回归和接收器操作特征曲线分析,我们探索了术后早期 LVD 的预测因素,LVD 的定义是 LVEF 12 个百分点,即数据的第三个五分位数。术后 LVD 和 LVEF 显著下降的发生率分别为 12.9% 和 23.2%。除 LVESD 和 LVEF 外,E 波速度(而非 eRVSP)仍是术后 LVD 的重要预测因素。E波速度、LVESD和LVEF在风险预测中具有叠加效应。此外,E 波速度是 LVEF 显著下降的最强预测因子。E波速度>121.5 cm/s和>101.5 cm/s与术后LVD风险增加有关(几率比[OR],2.896;95%置信区间[95%CI],1.792-4.681;P<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart and Vessels
Heart and Vessels 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
211
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Heart and Vessels is an English-language journal that provides a forum of original ideas, excellent methods, and fascinating techniques on cardiovascular disease fields. All papers submitted for publication are evaluated only with regard to scientific quality and relevance to the heart and vessels. Contributions from those engaged in practical medicine, as well as from those involved in basic research, are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信