Assessing post-COVID-19 respiratory dynamics: a comprehensive analysis of pulmonary function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and bronchodilator response.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
ERJ Open Research Pub Date : 2024-10-07 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1183/23120541.00149-2024
Chun-Yao Huang, Yao-Kuang Wu, Mei-Chen Yang, Kuo-Liang Huang, Wen-Lin Su, Yi-Chih Huang, Wu Chih-Wei, I-Shiang Tzeng, Chou-Chin Lan
{"title":"Assessing post-COVID-19 respiratory dynamics: a comprehensive analysis of pulmonary function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and bronchodilator response.","authors":"Chun-Yao Huang, Yao-Kuang Wu, Mei-Chen Yang, Kuo-Liang Huang, Wen-Lin Su, Yi-Chih Huang, Wu Chih-Wei, I-Shiang Tzeng, Chou-Chin Lan","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00149-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has a considerable impact on the global healthcare system. Individuals who have recovered from COVID often experience chronic respiratory symptoms that affect their daily lives. This study aimed to assess respiratory dynamics such as airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and bronchodilator response in post-COVID patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 282 adults with respiratory symptoms who underwent provocation tests. The demographic details, clinical symptoms and medical histories were recorded. Baseline spirometry, methacholine challenge tests (MCT) and post-bronchodilator spirometry were performed. Patients were divided into the following four groups: Group 1: non-COVID-19 and negative MCT; Group 2: post-COVID-19 and negative MCT; Group 3: non-COVID-19 and positive MCT; and Group 4: post-COVID-19 and positive MCT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most post-COVID-19 patients (43.7%) experienced AHR, and wheezing was more common. Patients in Group 4 exhibited increased intensities of dyspnoea, cough and wheezing with the lowest pulmonary function test (PFT) parameters at baseline. Moreover, significant decreases in PFT parameters after the MCT were observed in these patients. Although the prevalence of a low forced expiratory volume in 1 s to forced vital capacity ratio (<70%) was initially 2% in Group 4, it increased to 29% after MCT. No significant differences in allergic history or underlying diseases were observed between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings provide comprehensive insights into the AHR and respiratory symptoms of post-COVID-19 individuals, highlighting the characteristics and potential exacerbations in patients with positive MCT results. This emphasises the need of MCT to address respiratory dynamics in post-COVID-19 individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":11739,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":"10 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11456966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00149-2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has a considerable impact on the global healthcare system. Individuals who have recovered from COVID often experience chronic respiratory symptoms that affect their daily lives. This study aimed to assess respiratory dynamics such as airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and bronchodilator response in post-COVID patients.

Methods: This study included 282 adults with respiratory symptoms who underwent provocation tests. The demographic details, clinical symptoms and medical histories were recorded. Baseline spirometry, methacholine challenge tests (MCT) and post-bronchodilator spirometry were performed. Patients were divided into the following four groups: Group 1: non-COVID-19 and negative MCT; Group 2: post-COVID-19 and negative MCT; Group 3: non-COVID-19 and positive MCT; and Group 4: post-COVID-19 and positive MCT.

Results: Most post-COVID-19 patients (43.7%) experienced AHR, and wheezing was more common. Patients in Group 4 exhibited increased intensities of dyspnoea, cough and wheezing with the lowest pulmonary function test (PFT) parameters at baseline. Moreover, significant decreases in PFT parameters after the MCT were observed in these patients. Although the prevalence of a low forced expiratory volume in 1 s to forced vital capacity ratio (<70%) was initially 2% in Group 4, it increased to 29% after MCT. No significant differences in allergic history or underlying diseases were observed between the groups.

Conclusions: These findings provide comprehensive insights into the AHR and respiratory symptoms of post-COVID-19 individuals, highlighting the characteristics and potential exacerbations in patients with positive MCT results. This emphasises the need of MCT to address respiratory dynamics in post-COVID-19 individuals.

评估 COVID-19 后的呼吸动态:肺功能、支气管高反应性和支气管扩张剂反应的综合分析。
背景:冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)对全球医疗保健系统造成了巨大影响。从 COVID 中康复的患者通常会出现影响日常生活的慢性呼吸道症状。本研究旨在评估 COVID 后患者的呼吸动态,如气道高反应性(AHR)和支气管扩张剂反应:本研究纳入了 282 名有呼吸道症状并接受了激发试验的成人。记录了详细的人口统计学资料、临床症状和病史。进行了基线肺活量测定、甲基胆碱挑战试验(MCT)和支气管扩张剂后肺活量测定。患者被分为以下四组:第 1 组:非 COVID-19 和 MCT 阴性;第 2 组:COVID-19 后和 MCT 阴性;第 3 组:非 COVID-19 和 MCT 阳性;第 4 组:COVID-19 后和 MCT 阳性:结果:大多数 COVID-19 后患者(43.7%)出现 AHR,喘息更为常见。第 4 组患者的呼吸困难、咳嗽和喘息加剧,肺功能测试(PFT)参数在基线时最低。此外,这些患者在接受 MCT 后肺功能测试参数明显下降。虽然 1 秒用力呼气量与用力肺活量比值较低(结论:肺活量比值越低,肺活量越高),但这些患者的肺活量比值并没有明显降低:这些研究结果全面揭示了 COVID-19 后患者的 AHR 和呼吸道症状,强调了 MCT 阳性患者的特征和潜在的病情加重。这就强调了 MCT 对解决 COVID-19 后患者呼吸动力学问题的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ERJ Open Research
ERJ Open Research Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
273
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: ERJ Open Research is a fully open access original research journal, published online by the European Respiratory Society. The journal aims to publish high-quality work in all fields of respiratory science and medicine, covering basic science, clinical translational science and clinical medicine. The journal was created to help fulfil the ERS objective to disseminate scientific and educational material to its members and to the medical community, but also to provide researchers with an affordable open access specialty journal in which to publish their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信