Modified furosemide responsiveness index and biomarkers for AKI progression and prognosis: a prospective observational study.

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Ying Su, Wen-Jun Liu, Yu-Feng Zhao, Yi-Jie Zhang, Yue Qiu, Zhi-Hui Lu, Peng Wang, Shuang Lin, Guo-Wei Tu, Zhe Luo
{"title":"Modified furosemide responsiveness index and biomarkers for AKI progression and prognosis: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Ying Su, Wen-Jun Liu, Yu-Feng Zhao, Yi-Jie Zhang, Yue Qiu, Zhi-Hui Lu, Peng Wang, Shuang Lin, Guo-Wei Tu, Zhe Luo","doi":"10.1186/s13613-024-01387-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Modified furosemide responsiveness index (mFRI) is a novel biomarker for assessing diuretic response and AKI progression in patients with early AKI. However, the comparative predictive performance of mFRI and novel renal biomarkers for adverse renal outcomes remains unclear. In a single-center prospective study, we aimed to evaluate the discriminatory abilities of mFRI and other novel renal biomarkers in predicting AKI progression and prognosis in patients with initial mild and moderate AKI (KDIGO stage 1 to 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with initial mild and moderate AKI within 48 h following cardiac surgery were included in this study. The mFRI, renal biomarkers (including serum or urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin [sNGAL or uNGAL], serum cystatin C, urinary N-acetyl-beta-D-glycosaminidase [uNAG], urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio) and cytokines (TNF, IL-1β, IL-2R, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10) were measured at AKI diagnosis. The mFRI was calculated for each patient, which was defined as 2-hour urine output divided by furosemide dose and body weight. Of 1013 included patients, 154 (15.2%) experienced AKI progression, with 59 (5.8%) progressing to stage 3 and 33 (3.3%) meeting the composite outcome of hospital mortality or receipt of renal replacement therapy (RRT). The mFRI showed non-inferiority or potential superiority to renal biomarkers and cytokines in predicting AKI progression (area under the curve [AUC] 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-0.82), progression to stage 3 (AUC 0.87, 95% CI 0.85-0.89), and composite outcome of death and receipt of RRT (AUC 0.85, 95% CI 0.82-0.87). Furthermore, the combination of a functional biomarker (mFRI) and a urinary injury biomarker (uNAG or uNGAL) resulted in a significant improvement in the prediction of adverse renal outcomes than either individual biomarker (all P < 0.05). Moreover, incorporating these panels into clinical model significantly enhanced its predictive capacity for adverse renal outcomes, as demonstrated by the C index, integrated discrimination improvement, and net reclassification improvement (all P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As a rapid, cost-effective and easily accessible biomarker, mFRI, exhibited superior or comparable predictive capabilities for AKI progression and prognosis compared to renal biomarkers in cardiac surgical patients with mild to moderate AKI.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04962412. Registered July 15, 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04962412?cond=NCT04962412&draw=2&rank=1 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"14 1","pages":"156"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11461418/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-024-01387-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Modified furosemide responsiveness index (mFRI) is a novel biomarker for assessing diuretic response and AKI progression in patients with early AKI. However, the comparative predictive performance of mFRI and novel renal biomarkers for adverse renal outcomes remains unclear. In a single-center prospective study, we aimed to evaluate the discriminatory abilities of mFRI and other novel renal biomarkers in predicting AKI progression and prognosis in patients with initial mild and moderate AKI (KDIGO stage 1 to 2).

Results: Patients with initial mild and moderate AKI within 48 h following cardiac surgery were included in this study. The mFRI, renal biomarkers (including serum or urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin [sNGAL or uNGAL], serum cystatin C, urinary N-acetyl-beta-D-glycosaminidase [uNAG], urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio) and cytokines (TNF, IL-1β, IL-2R, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10) were measured at AKI diagnosis. The mFRI was calculated for each patient, which was defined as 2-hour urine output divided by furosemide dose and body weight. Of 1013 included patients, 154 (15.2%) experienced AKI progression, with 59 (5.8%) progressing to stage 3 and 33 (3.3%) meeting the composite outcome of hospital mortality or receipt of renal replacement therapy (RRT). The mFRI showed non-inferiority or potential superiority to renal biomarkers and cytokines in predicting AKI progression (area under the curve [AUC] 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-0.82), progression to stage 3 (AUC 0.87, 95% CI 0.85-0.89), and composite outcome of death and receipt of RRT (AUC 0.85, 95% CI 0.82-0.87). Furthermore, the combination of a functional biomarker (mFRI) and a urinary injury biomarker (uNAG or uNGAL) resulted in a significant improvement in the prediction of adverse renal outcomes than either individual biomarker (all P < 0.05). Moreover, incorporating these panels into clinical model significantly enhanced its predictive capacity for adverse renal outcomes, as demonstrated by the C index, integrated discrimination improvement, and net reclassification improvement (all P < 0.05).

Conclusions: As a rapid, cost-effective and easily accessible biomarker, mFRI, exhibited superior or comparable predictive capabilities for AKI progression and prognosis compared to renal biomarkers in cardiac surgical patients with mild to moderate AKI.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04962412. Registered July 15, 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04962412?cond=NCT04962412&draw=2&rank=1 .

改良呋塞米反应性指数和生物标志物对 AKI 进展和预后的影响:一项前瞻性观察研究。
背景:改良呋塞米反应性指数(mFRI)是评估早期 AKI 患者利尿剂反应和 AKI 进展的新型生物标记物。然而,mFRI 和新型肾脏生物标记物对不良肾脏预后的预测性能比较仍不清楚。在一项单中心前瞻性研究中,我们旨在评估 mFRI 和其他新型肾脏生物标志物在预测初期轻度和中度 AKI 患者(KDIGO 1 到 2 期)的 AKI 进展和预后方面的鉴别能力:本研究纳入了心脏手术后48小时内首次出现轻度和中度AKI的患者。在诊断 AKI 时测量了 mFRI、肾脏生物标志物(包括血清或尿液中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质钙蛋白 [sNGAL 或 uNGAL]、血清胱抑素 C、尿液 N-乙酰基-beta-D-糖胺酶 [uNAG]、尿液白蛋白与肌酐比值)和细胞因子(TNF、IL-1β、IL-2R、IL-6、IL-8 和 IL-10)。计算每位患者的 mFRI,其定义为 2 小时尿量除以呋塞米剂量和体重。在纳入的 1013 名患者中,有 154 人(15.2%)出现 AKI 进展,其中 59 人(5.8%)进展到 3 期,33 人(3.3%)达到住院死亡率或接受肾脏替代治疗 (RRT) 的综合结果。在预测 AKI 进展(曲线下面积 [AUC] 0.80,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.77-0.82)、进展至 3 期(AUC 0.87,95% CI 0.85-0.89)以及死亡和接受 RRT 的综合结果(AUC 0.85,95% CI 0.82-0.87)方面,mFRI 与肾脏生物标志物和细胞因子相比没有劣势或潜在优势。此外,将功能性生物标记物(mFRI)和尿损伤生物标记物(uNAG 或 uNGAL)结合使用,在预测不良肾脏预后方面比单独使用其中一种生物标记物有显著改善(所有 P 均为结论):与肾脏生物标志物相比,mFRI 作为一种快速、经济、易于获得的生物标志物,对轻度至中度 AKI 的心脏手术患者的 AKI 进展和预后具有更优或相当的预测能力:试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov,NCT04962412。注册日期:2021 年 7 月 15 日,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04962412?cond=NCT04962412&draw=2&rank=1 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信