Perinatal Outcomes Based on Number of Digital Exams in Patients with Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membrane.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
American journal of perinatology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1055/a-2435-0774
Julia Burd, Evaline Xie, Jeannie C Kelly, Ebony B Carter, Anthony Odibo, Amanda Zofkie, Antonina Frolova, Nandini Raghuraman
{"title":"Perinatal Outcomes Based on Number of Digital Exams in Patients with Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membrane.","authors":"Julia Burd, Evaline Xie, Jeannie C Kelly, Ebony B Carter, Anthony Odibo, Amanda Zofkie, Antonina Frolova, Nandini Raghuraman","doi":"10.1055/a-2435-0774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends speculum exams, rather than digital exams, for evaluation of the cervix after preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM). However, in clinical practice, digital exams may be necessary. We examined whether increasing numbers of digital exams were associated with adverse outcomes in PPROM.This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients admitted between 2019 and 2021 with PPROM at 24 to 34 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome was intra-amniotic infection and inflammation (triple I), compared between patients who had ≤1 or ≥2 digital exams during expectant management of PPROM. Secondary outcomes included latency, antepartum events, and other maternal and neonatal morbidities. Groups were compared using univariate analysis and Cox proportional hazards model to account for time between admission and delivery and potential confounders.Of 125 patients included in the analysis, 46 (36.8%) had ≤ 1 and 79 (63.2%) had ≥2 digital exams. There was no significant difference in triple I between groups (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47, 2.26). There were no significant differences in composite maternal or neonatal morbidities or latency from admission to delivery between groups (8 days [interquartile range (IQR): 3, 14] vs. 6 days [IQR: 3, 12]). There was a higher rate of spontaneous labor as the indication for delivery in the group with ≥2 exams (aHR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.04, 4.11).In this retrospective cohort study, ≥2 digital exams during expectant management of PPROM was not associated with change in infectious morbidity or pregnancy latency. There was an increase in spontaneous labor in the group with more digital exams; this may be due to confounding by indication, as patients who are in prodromal labor are more likely to receive digital exams. These results suggest equipoise in exam type in the management of PPROM. · We compared patients with ≤1 or ≥2 digital exams during latency with PPROM.. · There was no difference in rate of triple I with increased number of digital exams.. · There was no difference in latency or other neonatal or maternal morbidities.. · There was an increase in labor as indication for delivery with more digital exams..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":"965-970"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2435-0774","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends speculum exams, rather than digital exams, for evaluation of the cervix after preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM). However, in clinical practice, digital exams may be necessary. We examined whether increasing numbers of digital exams were associated with adverse outcomes in PPROM.This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients admitted between 2019 and 2021 with PPROM at 24 to 34 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome was intra-amniotic infection and inflammation (triple I), compared between patients who had ≤1 or ≥2 digital exams during expectant management of PPROM. Secondary outcomes included latency, antepartum events, and other maternal and neonatal morbidities. Groups were compared using univariate analysis and Cox proportional hazards model to account for time between admission and delivery and potential confounders.Of 125 patients included in the analysis, 46 (36.8%) had ≤ 1 and 79 (63.2%) had ≥2 digital exams. There was no significant difference in triple I between groups (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47, 2.26). There were no significant differences in composite maternal or neonatal morbidities or latency from admission to delivery between groups (8 days [interquartile range (IQR): 3, 14] vs. 6 days [IQR: 3, 12]). There was a higher rate of spontaneous labor as the indication for delivery in the group with ≥2 exams (aHR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.04, 4.11).In this retrospective cohort study, ≥2 digital exams during expectant management of PPROM was not associated with change in infectious morbidity or pregnancy latency. There was an increase in spontaneous labor in the group with more digital exams; this may be due to confounding by indication, as patients who are in prodromal labor are more likely to receive digital exams. These results suggest equipoise in exam type in the management of PPROM. · We compared patients with ≤1 or ≥2 digital exams during latency with PPROM.. · There was no difference in rate of triple I with increased number of digital exams.. · There was no difference in latency or other neonatal or maternal morbidities.. · There was an increase in labor as indication for delivery with more digital exams..

基于早产儿畸形患者数字检查次数的围产期结果。
目的:美国妇产科协会(ACOG)建议在产前胎膜早破(PPROM)后对宫颈进行评估时使用窥器检查,而不是数字检查。然而,在临床实践中,数字检查可能是必要的。我们研究了数字检查次数的增加是否与 PPROM 的不良结局有关:这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2019年至2021年期间入院的妊娠24-34周的PPROM患者。主要结果是羊膜腔内感染和炎症(三重 I),并对在 PPROM 预产期管理期间进行过 2 次数字检查的患者进行比较。次要结果包括潜伏期、产前事件以及其他孕产妇和新生儿疾病。采用单变量分析和考克斯比例危险模型对各组进行比较,以考虑入院与分娩之间的时间间隔和潜在的混杂因素:在纳入分析的125名患者中,46人(36.8%)进行过<1次数字检查,79人(63.2%)进行过 2次数字检查。组间三重 I 无明显差异(调整后危险比 [aHR] 1.03,95% 置信区间 (CI) 0.47,2.26)。各组间的产妇或新生儿综合发病率或从入院到分娩的潜伏期(8 天(四分位数间距(IQR)3, 14)对 6 天(IQR 3, 12))无明显差异。2 检查组的自然分娩率更高(aHR 2.07,95% CI 1.04,4.11):在这项回顾性队列研究中,在PPROM预产期管理期间进行≥2次数字化检查与感染发病率或妊娠潜伏期的变化无关。检查次数较多的一组自然分娩率有所上升;这可能是由于适应症造成的混淆,因为处于临产期的患者更有可能接受数字化检查。这些结果表明,在处理前兆流产时,检查类型是等效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信