A novel approach to manage Schneiderian membrane perforation in the maxillary sinus floor augmentation: The "Sinus Pack" technique. Histomorphometric analysis. Part 2/3.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
American journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2024-07-01
Pier C Passarelli, Michele A Lopez, Andrea Netti, Piotr Wychowański, Massimo Del Fabbro, Matteo Chiapasco, Antonio D'Addona
{"title":"A novel approach to manage Schneiderian membrane perforation in the maxillary sinus floor augmentation: The \"Sinus Pack\" technique. Histomorphometric analysis. Part 2/3.","authors":"Pier C Passarelli, Michele A Lopez, Andrea Netti, Piotr Wychowański, Massimo Del Fabbro, Matteo Chiapasco, Antonio D'Addona","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This retrospective study examined the histomorphometrical outcomes resulting from managing Schneiderian membrane perforation during maxillary sinus floor augmentation using two different approaches and relating the results to perforation size.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>19 subjects (7 males, 12 females, mean age 53.3±10.5 years), who experienced a sinus membrane perforation during lateral sinus lift procedure, were enrolled. Perforations were addressed utilizing either the \"Sinus Pack\" technique (test group, 11 subjects) or collagen membranes with absorbable sutures (control group, 8 subjects). The \"Sinus Pack\" consisted of a combination of collagenated porcine bone, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and a biocompatible synthetic copolymer, wrapped in a resorbable porcine mesenchymal collagen membrane. Histomorphometry outcomes of both techniques were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of vital bone was significantly higher with the \"Sinus Pack\" approach (44.5% ± 19.8%) compared to the control group (26.3% ± 21.2%) (P= 0.045).</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The \"Sinus Pack\" approach for managing sinus membrane perforations appears to be effective and advantageous, as it has resulted in optimal histomorphometric outcomes, indicating a significant increase in vital bone.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":"37 SIA","pages":"18A-20A"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This retrospective study examined the histomorphometrical outcomes resulting from managing Schneiderian membrane perforation during maxillary sinus floor augmentation using two different approaches and relating the results to perforation size.

Methods: 19 subjects (7 males, 12 females, mean age 53.3±10.5 years), who experienced a sinus membrane perforation during lateral sinus lift procedure, were enrolled. Perforations were addressed utilizing either the "Sinus Pack" technique (test group, 11 subjects) or collagen membranes with absorbable sutures (control group, 8 subjects). The "Sinus Pack" consisted of a combination of collagenated porcine bone, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and a biocompatible synthetic copolymer, wrapped in a resorbable porcine mesenchymal collagen membrane. Histomorphometry outcomes of both techniques were compared.

Results: The percentage of vital bone was significantly higher with the "Sinus Pack" approach (44.5% ± 19.8%) compared to the control group (26.3% ± 21.2%) (P= 0.045).

Clinical significance: The "Sinus Pack" approach for managing sinus membrane perforations appears to be effective and advantageous, as it has resulted in optimal histomorphometric outcomes, indicating a significant increase in vital bone.

上颌窦底隆鼻术中处理施奈德膜穿孔的新方法:窦包 "技术。组织形态分析。第 2/3 部分。
目的:这项回顾性研究探讨了在上颌窦底隆鼻术中使用两种不同方法处理施奈德膜穿孔所产生的组织形态计量学结果,并将结果与穿孔大小联系起来。穿孔采用 "窦包 "技术(试验组,11 名受试者)或带可吸收缝线的胶原膜(对照组,8 名受试者)。窦包 "由胶原猪骨、多不饱和脂肪酸和生物相容性合成共聚物组合而成,并包裹在可吸收的猪间充质胶原膜中。比较了两种技术的组织形态学结果:结果:与对照组(26.3% ± 21.2%)相比,"窦道包 "方法的活骨百分比(44.5% ± 19.8%)明显更高(P= 0.045):临床意义:采用 "窦道包 "方法治疗窦膜穿孔似乎是有效和有利的,因为这种方法取得了最佳的组织形态学结果,表明有活力的骨量明显增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of dentistry
American journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信