A novel approach to manage Schneiderian membrane perforation in the maxillary sinus floor augmentation: The "Sinus Pack" technique. Anatomical factors and surgical outcomes related to perforation size and handling. Part 3/3.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
American journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2024-07-01
Pier C Passarelli, Michele A Lopez, Andrea Netti, Piotr Wychowański, Massimo Del Fabbro, Matteo Chiapasco, Antonio D'Addona
{"title":"A novel approach to manage Schneiderian membrane perforation in the maxillary sinus floor augmentation: The \"Sinus Pack\" technique. Anatomical factors and surgical outcomes related to perforation size and handling. Part 3/3.","authors":"Pier C Passarelli, Michele A Lopez, Andrea Netti, Piotr Wychowański, Massimo Del Fabbro, Matteo Chiapasco, Antonio D'Addona","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To highlight the different risk factors, whether surgical or anatomical, related to Schneiderian membrane perforation, while evaluating the predictability of currently available methods to manage such perforations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Charts of subjects experiencing perforation during maxillary sinus augmentation were retrospectively reviewed. Data related to possible anatomical and surgical risk factors were extracted. The correlation between membrane perforation size and anatomical risk factors (e.g., sinus septa, residual bone height and membrane thickness), surgical risk factors (satisfactory clinical management score - SCMs) and implant outcomes was statistically evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine out of 10 subjects with perforation size ≥5 mm presented a less than 1.5 mm (P= 0.011) sinus membrane thickness. About 80% of subjects with easy or fair SCMs presented a residual bone height lower than 4 mm (P= 0.02) The SCMs were significantly worse in subjects with a perforation size ≥ 5 mm (2.8 ± 1.5) compared to those with a perforation size < 5 mm (1.4 ± 0.7) (P= 0.03).</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Techniques for the management of Schneider's membrane perforation should take into consideration anatomical and surgical risk factors, to render surgical therapies more predictable, reducing patient morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":"37 SIA","pages":"21A-24A"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To highlight the different risk factors, whether surgical or anatomical, related to Schneiderian membrane perforation, while evaluating the predictability of currently available methods to manage such perforations.

Methods: Charts of subjects experiencing perforation during maxillary sinus augmentation were retrospectively reviewed. Data related to possible anatomical and surgical risk factors were extracted. The correlation between membrane perforation size and anatomical risk factors (e.g., sinus septa, residual bone height and membrane thickness), surgical risk factors (satisfactory clinical management score - SCMs) and implant outcomes was statistically evaluated.

Results: Nine out of 10 subjects with perforation size ≥5 mm presented a less than 1.5 mm (P= 0.011) sinus membrane thickness. About 80% of subjects with easy or fair SCMs presented a residual bone height lower than 4 mm (P= 0.02) The SCMs were significantly worse in subjects with a perforation size ≥ 5 mm (2.8 ± 1.5) compared to those with a perforation size < 5 mm (1.4 ± 0.7) (P= 0.03).

Clinical significance: Techniques for the management of Schneider's membrane perforation should take into consideration anatomical and surgical risk factors, to render surgical therapies more predictable, reducing patient morbidity.

上颌窦底隆鼻术中处理施奈德膜穿孔的新方法:窦包 "技术。与穿孔大小和处理相关的解剖因素和手术效果。第 3/3 部分。
目的:强调与施奈德膜穿孔有关的不同风险因素,无论是手术还是解剖因素,同时评估目前可用的处理此类穿孔的方法的可预测性:对上颌窦隆鼻术中发生穿孔的受试者病历进行回顾性审查。方法:对上颌窦增大术中出现穿孔的受试者病历进行回顾性审查,提取与可能的解剖和手术风险因素相关的数据。对膜穿孔大小与解剖风险因素(如上颌窦间隔、残余骨高度和膜厚度)、手术风险因素(满意临床管理评分 - SCMs)和植入结果之间的相关性进行了统计评估:在穿孔大小≥5 毫米的 10 位受试者中,有 9 位的窦膜厚度小于 1.5 毫米(P= 0.011)。穿孔大小≥5 毫米(2.8 ± 1.5)的受试者与穿孔大小<5 毫米(1.4 ± 0.7)的受试者相比,SCM 明显更差(P= 0.03):临床意义:施耐德膜穿孔的治疗技术应考虑解剖和手术风险因素,使手术疗法更具可预测性,降低患者发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of dentistry
American journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信