Effects of a large-scale bioretention installation on the species composition of an urban bird community as determined by passive acoustic monitoring

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
David Wituszynski, Donald Hayford, Angelika Poesel, Gautam Apte, Stephen N. Matthews, Jay Martin
{"title":"Effects of a large-scale bioretention installation on the species composition of an urban bird community as determined by passive acoustic monitoring","authors":"David Wituszynski,&nbsp;Donald Hayford,&nbsp;Angelika Poesel,&nbsp;Gautam Apte,&nbsp;Stephen N. Matthews,&nbsp;Jay Martin","doi":"10.1007/s10661-024-13143-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As urbanization accelerates worldwide, municipalities are attempting to construct new green spaces within their borders. The perceived ecological value of these places is frequently tied to their ability to attract urban wildlife, such as birds, which can easily be observed and enjoyed. As one strategy, stormwater is now frequently managed with green infrastructure: planted areas that retain and treat stormwater rather than merely directing it to surface waters. While these practices have the potential to provide habitat for urban wildlife, the ecological effects of these systems are largely unknown. To assess whether one green infrastructure project increases habitat value, we used passive acoustic monitoring to survey urban bird communities in and near a large green infrastructure project in Columbus, Ohio (USA). Bird communities near bioretention cells (rain gardens) were compared to those at nearby lawns and remnant or restored natural areas. We found that recently installed bioretention cells tended to support more omnivores, lower-canopy foraging species, and species from a higher diversity of feeding guilds than did nearby lawn control sites. We were unable to detect effects of nearby bioretention installations on bird species richness at other sites. The observed differences in species richness were fairly small, and we urge caution when anticipating the habitat value of bioretention cells, at least for bird species. However, the results that we observed suggest that bioretention cells could have a more positive impact on bird communities in different contexts or using different design strategies. The bioretention cells surveyed in this study were small and only planted in grasses and forbs, potentially limiting their ability to offer complex habitat. They were also relatively young, and future work is needed to determine their long-term effect on avian communities and biodiversity of other taxa.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-024-13143-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As urbanization accelerates worldwide, municipalities are attempting to construct new green spaces within their borders. The perceived ecological value of these places is frequently tied to their ability to attract urban wildlife, such as birds, which can easily be observed and enjoyed. As one strategy, stormwater is now frequently managed with green infrastructure: planted areas that retain and treat stormwater rather than merely directing it to surface waters. While these practices have the potential to provide habitat for urban wildlife, the ecological effects of these systems are largely unknown. To assess whether one green infrastructure project increases habitat value, we used passive acoustic monitoring to survey urban bird communities in and near a large green infrastructure project in Columbus, Ohio (USA). Bird communities near bioretention cells (rain gardens) were compared to those at nearby lawns and remnant or restored natural areas. We found that recently installed bioretention cells tended to support more omnivores, lower-canopy foraging species, and species from a higher diversity of feeding guilds than did nearby lawn control sites. We were unable to detect effects of nearby bioretention installations on bird species richness at other sites. The observed differences in species richness were fairly small, and we urge caution when anticipating the habitat value of bioretention cells, at least for bird species. However, the results that we observed suggest that bioretention cells could have a more positive impact on bird communities in different contexts or using different design strategies. The bioretention cells surveyed in this study were small and only planted in grasses and forbs, potentially limiting their ability to offer complex habitat. They were also relatively young, and future work is needed to determine their long-term effect on avian communities and biodiversity of other taxa.

通过被动声学监测确定大规模生物滞留装置对城市鸟类群落物种组成的影响。
随着全球城市化进程的加快,市政当局正试图在其境内建造新的绿地。这些地方被认为具有的生态价值往往与它们吸引城市野生动物(如鸟类)的能力息息相关,因为这些野生动物可以很容易地观察和欣赏到。作为一种策略,雨水现在经常通过绿色基础设施进行管理:种植区可以保留和处理雨水,而不仅仅是将雨水引向地表水。虽然这些做法有可能为城市野生动物提供栖息地,但这些系统的生态效应在很大程度上还是未知数。为了评估一个绿色基础设施项目是否提高了栖息地的价值,我们使用被动声学监测来调查美国俄亥俄州哥伦布市一个大型绿色基础设施项目内和附近的城市鸟类群落。我们将生物蓄水池(雨水花园)附近的鸟类群落与附近草坪、残留或恢复自然区域的鸟类群落进行了比较。我们发现,与附近的草坪对照地点相比,新近安装的生物滞留小区倾向于支持更多的杂食性动物、低树冠觅食物种以及更多样化的觅食行会物种。在其他地点,我们无法检测到附近生物滞留设施对鸟类物种丰富度的影响。观察到的物种丰富度差异相当小,因此我们建议在预测生物蓄渗小区的栖息地价值时要谨慎,至少对鸟类而言是如此。不过,我们观察到的结果表明,在不同的环境下或采用不同的设计策略,生物滞留小区可能会对鸟类群落产生更积极的影响。本研究调查的生物滞留小区面积较小,而且只种植了草和草本植物,这可能限制了它们提供复杂栖息地的能力。此外,这些生物蓄水池还比较年轻,因此需要在今后的工作中确定它们对鸟类群落和其他类群生物多样性的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信