The Impact of QT-Prolonging Medications and Drug-Drug Interactions on QTc Interval Prolongation in Hospitalized Patients: A Case-Crossover Study.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Hsiu-Ting Chien, Fang-Ju Lin, Jyh-Ming Jimmy Juang, Shu-Wen Lin
{"title":"The Impact of QT-Prolonging Medications and Drug-Drug Interactions on QTc Interval Prolongation in Hospitalized Patients: A Case-Crossover Study.","authors":"Hsiu-Ting Chien, Fang-Ju Lin, Jyh-Ming Jimmy Juang, Shu-Wen Lin","doi":"10.1002/cpt.3469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Researchers have studied potential corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation from drug-drug interactions (DDIs), raising unresolved questions about their real-world impact. This retrospective case-crossover study investigated the effects of QT-prolonging drugs and DDIs on QTc prolongation in hospitalized patients aged 45 years and above. The cohort comprised patients who had multiple hospitalizations and developed QTc prolongation (QTc > 500 ms or an increase of >60 ms from baseline) at least 24 hours after admission between 2011 and 2019. Conditional logistic regression compared drug exposure between hospitalizations with QTc prolongation (case window) and those without (reference window). Among 2,276 patients (mean age 71; 43.8% female), the use of QT-prolonging drugs significantly increased the risk of QTc prolongation (odds ratio: 2.42 (95% confidence interval: 1.95-3.02)). The risk was higher with drugs of \"known risks\" (OR: 3.78 (2.91-4.90)) and \"conditional risk\" (OR: 2.08 (1.65-2.62)). DDIs, particularly involving multiple \"known risk\" drugs (OR: 7.86 (4.96-12.45)), strong cytochrome P450 enzyme inhibitors (OR: 5.57 (2.75-11.30)), or the concurrent use of ≥4 QT-prolonging drugs with any risk (OR: 5.28 (3.96-7.03)) substantially increased the risk. Cautious prescribing for patients with multiple risk factors is important to minimize the likelihood of QTc prolongation. However, when considering enhanced monitoring or drug choices, it is crucial to carefully evaluate the overall risk of QT prolongation against the benefits of treatment to ensure optimal patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.3469","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Researchers have studied potential corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation from drug-drug interactions (DDIs), raising unresolved questions about their real-world impact. This retrospective case-crossover study investigated the effects of QT-prolonging drugs and DDIs on QTc prolongation in hospitalized patients aged 45 years and above. The cohort comprised patients who had multiple hospitalizations and developed QTc prolongation (QTc > 500 ms or an increase of >60 ms from baseline) at least 24 hours after admission between 2011 and 2019. Conditional logistic regression compared drug exposure between hospitalizations with QTc prolongation (case window) and those without (reference window). Among 2,276 patients (mean age 71; 43.8% female), the use of QT-prolonging drugs significantly increased the risk of QTc prolongation (odds ratio: 2.42 (95% confidence interval: 1.95-3.02)). The risk was higher with drugs of "known risks" (OR: 3.78 (2.91-4.90)) and "conditional risk" (OR: 2.08 (1.65-2.62)). DDIs, particularly involving multiple "known risk" drugs (OR: 7.86 (4.96-12.45)), strong cytochrome P450 enzyme inhibitors (OR: 5.57 (2.75-11.30)), or the concurrent use of ≥4 QT-prolonging drugs with any risk (OR: 5.28 (3.96-7.03)) substantially increased the risk. Cautious prescribing for patients with multiple risk factors is important to minimize the likelihood of QTc prolongation. However, when considering enhanced monitoring or drug choices, it is crucial to carefully evaluate the overall risk of QT prolongation against the benefits of treatment to ensure optimal patient care.

QT 延长药物和药物间相互作用对住院患者 QTc 间期延长的影响:病例交叉研究
研究人员对药物间相互作用(DDI)可能导致的校正 QT 间期(QTc)延长进行了研究,但对其在现实世界中的影响提出了一些尚未解决的问题。这项回顾性病例交叉研究调查了 QT 延长药物和 DDI 对 45 岁及以上住院患者 QTc 延长的影响。研究对象包括2011年至2019年期间多次住院并在入院后至少24小时内出现QTc延长(QTc>500毫秒或比基线增加>60毫秒)的患者。条件逻辑回归比较了有 QTc 延长(病例窗)和无 QTc 延长(参考窗)的住院患者之间的药物暴露情况。在2276名患者(平均年龄71岁;43.8%为女性)中,使用QT延长药物会显著增加QTc延长的风险(几率比:2.42(95%置信区间:1.95-3.02))。使用 "已知风险 "药物(OR:3.78(2.91-4.90))和 "有条件风险 "药物(OR:2.08(1.65-2.62))的风险更高。DDIs,尤其是涉及多种 "已知风险 "药物(OR:7.86(4.96-12.45))、强细胞色素 P450 酶抑制剂(OR:5.57(2.75-11.30))或同时使用≥4 种具有任何风险的 QT 延长药物(OR:5.28(3.96-7.03))会大大增加风险。对具有多种风险因素的患者谨慎用药,对于最大限度地降低 QTc 延长的可能性非常重要。但是,在考虑加强监测或选择药物时,必须仔细评估 QT 延长的总体风险与治疗的益处,以确保为患者提供最佳护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信