Clinical relevance of paramagnetic rim lesion heterogeneity in multiple sclerosis.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Anna Stölting, Colin Vanden Bulcke, Serena Borrelli, Céline Bugli, Renaud Du Pasquier, Vincent van Pesch, Pietro Maggi
{"title":"Clinical relevance of paramagnetic rim lesion heterogeneity in multiple sclerosis.","authors":"Anna Stölting, Colin Vanden Bulcke, Serena Borrelli, Céline Bugli, Renaud Du Pasquier, Vincent van Pesch, Pietro Maggi","doi":"10.1002/acn3.52220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Previous studies reveal heterogeneity in terms of paramagnetic rim lesions (PRL) associated tissue damage. We investigated the physiopathology and clinical implications of this heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 103 MS patients (72 relapsing and 31 progressive), brain lesions were manually segmented on 3T 3D-FLAIR and rim visibility was assessed with a visual confidence level score (VCLS) on 3D-EPI phase. Using T1 relaxation time maps, lesions were categorized in long-T1 and short-T1. Lesion age was calculated from time of first gadolinium enhancement (N = 84 lesions). Results on clinical scores were validated in an extended cohort of 167 patients using normalized T1w-MPRAGE lesion values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Rim visibility (VCLS analysis) was associated with increasing lesional T1 (P/P<sub>FDR</sub> < 0.001). Of 1680 analyzed lesions, 427 were categorized as PRL. Long-T1 PRL were older than short-T1 PRL (average 0.8 vs. 2.0 years, P/P<sub>FDR</sub> = 0.005/0.008), and featured larger lesional volume (P/P<sub>FDR</sub> < 0.0001) and multi-shell diffusion-measured axonal damage (P/P<sub>FDR</sub> < 0.0001). The total volume of long-T1-PRL versus PRL showed 2× predictive power for both higher MS disability (EDSS; P/P<sub>FDR</sub> = 0.003/0.005 vs. P/P<sub>FDR</sub> = 0.042/0.057) and severity (MSSS; P/P<sub>FDR</sub> = 0.0006/0.001 vs. P/P<sub>FDR</sub> = 0.004/0.007). In random forest, having ≥1 long-T1-PRL versus ≥4 PRL showed 2-4× higher performance to predict a higher EDSS and MSSS. In the validation cohort, long-T1 PRL outperformed (~2×) PRL in predicting both EDSS and MSSS.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>PRL show substantial heterogeneity in terms of intralesional tissue damage. More destructive, likely older, long-T1 PRL improve the association with MS clinical scales. This PRL heterogeneity characterization was replicated using standard T1w MRI, highlighting its potential for clinical translation.</p>","PeriodicalId":126,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.52220","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Previous studies reveal heterogeneity in terms of paramagnetic rim lesions (PRL) associated tissue damage. We investigated the physiopathology and clinical implications of this heterogeneity.

Methods: In 103 MS patients (72 relapsing and 31 progressive), brain lesions were manually segmented on 3T 3D-FLAIR and rim visibility was assessed with a visual confidence level score (VCLS) on 3D-EPI phase. Using T1 relaxation time maps, lesions were categorized in long-T1 and short-T1. Lesion age was calculated from time of first gadolinium enhancement (N = 84 lesions). Results on clinical scores were validated in an extended cohort of 167 patients using normalized T1w-MPRAGE lesion values.

Results: Rim visibility (VCLS analysis) was associated with increasing lesional T1 (P/PFDR < 0.001). Of 1680 analyzed lesions, 427 were categorized as PRL. Long-T1 PRL were older than short-T1 PRL (average 0.8 vs. 2.0 years, P/PFDR = 0.005/0.008), and featured larger lesional volume (P/PFDR < 0.0001) and multi-shell diffusion-measured axonal damage (P/PFDR < 0.0001). The total volume of long-T1-PRL versus PRL showed 2× predictive power for both higher MS disability (EDSS; P/PFDR = 0.003/0.005 vs. P/PFDR = 0.042/0.057) and severity (MSSS; P/PFDR = 0.0006/0.001 vs. P/PFDR = 0.004/0.007). In random forest, having ≥1 long-T1-PRL versus ≥4 PRL showed 2-4× higher performance to predict a higher EDSS and MSSS. In the validation cohort, long-T1 PRL outperformed (~2×) PRL in predicting both EDSS and MSSS.

Interpretation: PRL show substantial heterogeneity in terms of intralesional tissue damage. More destructive, likely older, long-T1 PRL improve the association with MS clinical scales. This PRL heterogeneity characterization was replicated using standard T1w MRI, highlighting its potential for clinical translation.

多发性硬化症顺磁边缘病变异质性的临床意义。
目的:以往的研究显示,与顺磁边缘病变(PRL)相关的组织损伤具有异质性。我们研究了这种异质性的生理病理和临床意义:在 103 名多发性硬化症患者(72 名复发患者和 31 名进行性患者)中,通过 3T 3D-FLAIR 对脑部病变进行人工分割,并通过 3D-EPI 相的视觉置信度评分(VCLS)评估边缘可见度。通过 T1 松弛时间图,病变被分为长 T1 和短 T1 两类。病变年龄从首次钆增强的时间开始计算(N = 84 个病变)。使用归一化 T1w-MPRAGE 病灶值对 167 名患者的临床评分结果进行了验证:结果:边缘可见度(VCLS 分析)与病变 T1 增加相关(P/PFDR FDR = 0.005/0.008),病变体积(P/PFDR FDR FDR = 0.003/0.005 vs. P/PFDR = 0.042/0.057)和严重程度(MSSS;P/PFDR = 0.0006/0.001 vs. P/PFDR = 0.004/0.007)较大。在随机森林中,≥1个长T1-PRL与≥4个PRL相比,预测较高的EDSS和MSSS的性能高出2-4倍。在验证队列中,长T1 PRL在预测EDSS和MSSS方面的表现优于PRL(约2倍):PRL在组织内部损伤方面显示出很大的异质性。更具破坏性、可能更老、长T1的PRL提高了与多发性硬化症临床量表的关联性。使用标准 T1w MRI 复制了这种 PRL 异质性特征,突出了其临床应用的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
1.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology is a peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of high-quality research related to all areas of neurology. The journal publishes original research and scholarly reviews focused on the mechanisms and treatments of diseases of the nervous system; high-impact topics in neurologic education; and other topics of interest to the clinical neuroscience community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信