Effects of telerehabilitation-implemented core stability exercises on patient-reported and performance-based outcomes in total knee arthroplasty patients: randomised controlled trial.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Akın Süzer, Nihal Büker, Harun Reşit Güngör, Nusret Ök, Raziye Şavkin
{"title":"Effects of telerehabilitation-implemented core stability exercises on patient-reported and performance-based outcomes in total knee arthroplasty patients: randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Akın Süzer, Nihal Büker, Harun Reşit Güngör, Nusret Ök, Raziye Şavkin","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2024.2411312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Face-to-face access to exercise programs, including standard exercises (SE) and core stability exercises (CSE), can be challenging for many total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the effects of adding CSE to SE on patient-reported and performance-based outcomes in TKA patients using telerehabilitation (TR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Group 1 (SE, <i>n</i> = 21) and Group 2 (SE+CSE, <i>n</i> = 21). Follow-up included videoconferences (1-8 weeks) and telephone calls (9-12 weeks). Assessments (preoperatively and at 1st, 2nd, and 3rd postoperative months) included; Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC): functional level, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): pain intensity, Copenhagen Knee Range of Motion (ROM) Scale (CKRS): knee ROM, Short Form-12 (SF-12) and World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF): quality of life, 30-s Chair-Stand Test: muscle strength, and Stair Climb Test: locomotor performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All assessments showed a significant improvement after treatment in group 1 (<i>p</i> < .001, Cohen's d = 0.315 to 0.959) and group 2 (<i>p</i> < .001, d = 0.445 to 0.901). There was no significant difference between groups in knee flexion ROM (<i>p</i> > .05). Group 2 achieved better results in functional level (<i>p</i> = .001 to 0.003,d = -0.334 to 1.207), pain intensity (<i>p</i> = .030,d = -0.334), knee extension ROM (<i>p</i> = .015,d = -0.374), quality of life (<i>p</i> = .001 to 0.046,d = -0.308 to -1.366), muscle strength (<i>p</i> = .002 to 0.016,d = -0.779 to -1.030), and locomotor performance (<i>p</i> = .004 to 0.009, d = 0.404 to 0.954).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SE and SE+CSE via TR enhance patient-reported and performance-based outcomes in post-operative TKA patients, with CSE providing additional benefits. These results support using CSE in TR programs for TKA and encourage further research on TR.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2411312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Face-to-face access to exercise programs, including standard exercises (SE) and core stability exercises (CSE), can be challenging for many total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients.

Objectives: To investigate the effects of adding CSE to SE on patient-reported and performance-based outcomes in TKA patients using telerehabilitation (TR).

Methods: Group 1 (SE, n = 21) and Group 2 (SE+CSE, n = 21). Follow-up included videoconferences (1-8 weeks) and telephone calls (9-12 weeks). Assessments (preoperatively and at 1st, 2nd, and 3rd postoperative months) included; Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC): functional level, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): pain intensity, Copenhagen Knee Range of Motion (ROM) Scale (CKRS): knee ROM, Short Form-12 (SF-12) and World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF): quality of life, 30-s Chair-Stand Test: muscle strength, and Stair Climb Test: locomotor performance.

Results: All assessments showed a significant improvement after treatment in group 1 (p < .001, Cohen's d = 0.315 to 0.959) and group 2 (p < .001, d = 0.445 to 0.901). There was no significant difference between groups in knee flexion ROM (p > .05). Group 2 achieved better results in functional level (p = .001 to 0.003,d = -0.334 to 1.207), pain intensity (p = .030,d = -0.334), knee extension ROM (p = .015,d = -0.374), quality of life (p = .001 to 0.046,d = -0.308 to -1.366), muscle strength (p = .002 to 0.016,d = -0.779 to -1.030), and locomotor performance (p = .004 to 0.009, d = 0.404 to 0.954).

Conclusion: SE and SE+CSE via TR enhance patient-reported and performance-based outcomes in post-operative TKA patients, with CSE providing additional benefits. These results support using CSE in TR programs for TKA and encourage further research on TR.

远程康复实施的核心稳定性练习对全膝关节置换术患者的患者报告结果和表现结果的影响:随机对照试验。
背景:对于许多全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者来说,面对面地参加包括标准运动(SE)和核心稳定性运动(CSE)在内的运动项目具有挑战性:目的:研究在 SE 基础上增加 CSE 对使用远程康复(TR)的全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者的患者报告结果和基于表现的结果的影响:第一组(SE,n = 21)和第二组(SE+CSE,n = 21)。随访包括视频会议(1-8 周)和电话(9-12 周)。评估(术前、术后第一、第二和第三个月)包括:西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC):功能水平、视觉模拟量表(VAS):疼痛强度、哥本哈根膝关节活动范围量表(CKRS):膝关节活动范围、简表-12(SF-12)和世界卫生组织生活质量简明版(WHOQOL-BREF):生活质量、30 秒椅子站立测试:肌肉力量和爬楼梯测试:运动表现:结果:所有评估结果均显示,第 1 组在治疗后有明显改善(P P > .05)。第 2 组在功能水平(p = .001 to 0.003,d = -0.334 to 1.207)、疼痛强度(p = .030,d = -0.334)、膝关节伸展 ROM(p = .015,d = -0.374)、生活质量(p = .015,d = -0.374374)、生活质量(p = .001 至 0.046,d = -0.308 至 -1.366 )、肌肉力量(p = .002 至 0.016,d = -0.779 至 -1.030 )和运动表现(p = .004 至 0.009,d = 0.404 至 0.954):结论:通过TR进行SE和SE+CSE可提高TKA术后患者的患者报告结果和基于表现的结果,而CSE可带来额外的益处。这些结果支持在TKA的TR计划中使用CSE,并鼓励对TR进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信