Gaining Respect and Mitigating Risk: A Qualitative Exploration of How New Attendings Navigate Interpersonal Relationships with Recent Resident Peers.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Perspectives on Medical Education Pub Date : 2024-10-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5334/pme.1396
Cameryn C Garrett, Hannah Robinson, Jacob David, Brian Utz, Michelle B Azimov
{"title":"Gaining Respect and Mitigating Risk: A Qualitative Exploration of How New Attendings Navigate Interpersonal Relationships with Recent Resident Peers.","authors":"Cameryn C Garrett, Hannah Robinson, Jacob David, Brian Utz, Michelle B Azimov","doi":"10.5334/pme.1396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physicians moving through training experience changes in personal and professional relationships, which can increase stress, uncertainty, and burnout. Social connection can be an important resource but can introduce complexity and conflict. This study aimed to explore how early-career attendings navigate and manage changing organizational and friendship roles with recent resident peers (near-peers) through this critical transition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a reflexive thematic analysis of interviews with early-career attendings working with near-peers from the same institution where they trained. Twenty three of 27 (85%) eligible attendings from two United States health systems participated in semi-structured interviews between April and June 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Familiarity from working at the same institution where new attendings completed training made it more difficult to command authority. Early-career attendings at times struggled with insecurities about their ability to fulfill their new role and challenges from others in recognizing their new attending identity. These tensions could heighten emotions in the clinical setting and spill over into relationships with residents outside the workplace, impacting social lives and well-being. Early-career attendings engaged in strategies to manage the social realm of their transition with near-peers, including prioritizing their organizational role in the clinical setting and mitigating risks to their professional reputation by creating stronger boundaries between their personal and professional lives.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides new insight into how attendings navigate changing personal and professional relationships with recent resident peers and offers strategies on how to manage the social realm of this liminal transition.</p>","PeriodicalId":48532,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Medical Education","volume":"13 1","pages":"460-468"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11451548/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1396","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physicians moving through training experience changes in personal and professional relationships, which can increase stress, uncertainty, and burnout. Social connection can be an important resource but can introduce complexity and conflict. This study aimed to explore how early-career attendings navigate and manage changing organizational and friendship roles with recent resident peers (near-peers) through this critical transition.

Methods: We conducted a reflexive thematic analysis of interviews with early-career attendings working with near-peers from the same institution where they trained. Twenty three of 27 (85%) eligible attendings from two United States health systems participated in semi-structured interviews between April and June 2023.

Results: Familiarity from working at the same institution where new attendings completed training made it more difficult to command authority. Early-career attendings at times struggled with insecurities about their ability to fulfill their new role and challenges from others in recognizing their new attending identity. These tensions could heighten emotions in the clinical setting and spill over into relationships with residents outside the workplace, impacting social lives and well-being. Early-career attendings engaged in strategies to manage the social realm of their transition with near-peers, including prioritizing their organizational role in the clinical setting and mitigating risks to their professional reputation by creating stronger boundaries between their personal and professional lives.

Conclusions: This study provides new insight into how attendings navigate changing personal and professional relationships with recent resident peers and offers strategies on how to manage the social realm of this liminal transition.

获得尊重和降低风险:对新主治医师如何处理与新入职住院医师之间人际关系的定性研究。
背景:经过培训的医生会经历个人和职业关系的变化,这可能会增加压力、不确定性和职业倦怠。社会关系可能是一种重要的资源,但也可能带来复杂性和冲突。本研究旨在探讨职业生涯早期的主治医师如何在这一关键的过渡时期引导和管理与新近住院医师同行(近同行)之间不断变化的组织和友谊角色:我们对早期职业主治医师与来自同一培训机构的近同行的访谈进行了反思性主题分析。来自美国两个医疗系统的 27 名符合条件的主治医师中,有 23 名(85%)在 2023 年 4 月至 6 月期间参加了半结构化访谈:新主治医师在完成培训的同一医疗机构工作,对该医疗机构的熟悉使其更难掌握权力。初入职场的主治医师有时会为自己能否胜任新角色而感到不安全感,也会因他人不认可其新主治医师身份而面临挑战。这些矛盾会加剧临床环境中的情绪,并蔓延到工作场所以外与住院医生的关系中,影响社交生活和幸福感。职业生涯初期的主治医师采取了一些策略来管理他们与近邻之间的社会关系,包括优先考虑他们在临床环境中的组织角色,以及通过加强个人生活与职业生活之间的界限来降低他们职业声誉所面临的风险:本研究为了解主治医师如何处理与新住院医师同伴之间不断变化的个人和职业关系提供了新的视角,并为如何管理这种边缘过渡的社会领域提供了策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Perspectives on Medical Education mission is support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Official journal of the The Netherlands Association of Medical Education (NVMO). Perspectives on Medical Education is a non-profit Open Access journal with no charges for authors to submit or publish an article, and the full text of all articles is freely available immediately upon publication, thanks to the sponsorship of The Netherlands Association for Medical Education. Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. Perspectives on Medical Education positions itself at the dynamic intersection of educational research and clinical education. While other journals in the health professional education domain orient predominantly to education researchers or to clinical educators, Perspectives positions itself at the collaborative interface between these perspectives. This unique positioning reflects the journal’s mission to support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Reflecting this mission, the journal both welcomes original research papers arising from scholarly collaborations among clinicians, teachers and researchers and papers providing resources to develop the community’s ability to conduct such collaborative research. The journal’s audience includes researchers and practitioners: researchers who wish to explore challenging questions of health professions education and clinical teachers who wish to both advance their practice and envision for themselves a collaborative role in scholarly educational innovation. This audience of researchers, clinicians and educators is both international and interdisciplinary. The journal has a long history. In 1982, the journal was founded by the Dutch Association for Medical Education, as a Dutch language journal (Netherlands Journal of Medical Education). As a Dutch journal it fuelled educational research and innovation in the Netherlands. It is one of the factors for the Dutch success in medical education. In 2012, it widened its scope, transforming into an international English language journal. The journal swiftly became international in all aspects: the readers, authors, reviewers and editorial board members. The editorial board members represent the different parental disciplines in the field of medical education, e.g. clinicians, social scientists, biomedical scientists, statisticians and linguists. Several of them are leading scholars. Three of the editors are in the top ten of most cited authors in the medical education field. Two editors were awarded the Karolinska Institute Prize for Research. Presently, Erik Driessen leads the journal as Editor in Chief. Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. It is sponsored by theThe Netherlands Association of Medical Education and offers free manuscript submission. Perspectives on Medical Education positions itself at the dynamic intersection of educational research and clinical education. While other journals in the health professional education domain orient predominantly to education researchers or to clinical educators, Perspectives positions itself at the collaborative interface between these perspectives. This unique positioning reflects the journal’s mission to support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Reflecting this mission, the journal both welcomes original research papers arising from scholarly collaborations among clinicians, teachers and researchers and papers providing resources to develop the community’s ability to conduct such collaborative research. The journal’s audience includes researchers and practitioners: researchers who wish to explore challenging questions of health professions education and clinical teachers who wish to both advance their practice and envision for themselves a collaborative role in scholarly educational innovation. This audience of researchers, clinicians and educators is both international and interdisciplinary. The journal has a long history. In 1982, the journal was founded by the Dutch Association for Medical Education, as a Dutch language journal (Netherlands Journal of Medical Education). As a Dutch journal it fuelled educational research and innovation in the Netherlands. It is one of the factors for the Dutch success in medical education. In 2012, it widened its scope, transforming into an international English language journal. The journal swiftly became international in all aspects: the readers, authors, reviewers and editorial board members. The editorial board members represent the different parental disciplines in the field of medical education, e.g. clinicians, social scientists, biomedical scientists, statisticians and linguists. Several of them are leading scholars. Three of the editors are in the top ten of most cited authors in the medical education field. Two editors were awarded the Karolinska Institute Prize for Research. Presently, Erik Driessen leads the journal as Editor in Chief. Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. It is sponsored by theThe Netherlands Association of Medical Education and offers free manuscript submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信