PGY-2 emergency medicine residents are more efficient when paired with an early clinical medical student

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Nicole Liang, Corlin M. Jewell MD, Dann J. Hekman MS, Christopher Shank MA, Benjamin H. Schnapp MD, Med
{"title":"PGY-2 emergency medicine residents are more efficient when paired with an early clinical medical student","authors":"Nicole Liang,&nbsp;Corlin M. Jewell MD,&nbsp;Dann J. Hekman MS,&nbsp;Christopher Shank MA,&nbsp;Benjamin H. Schnapp MD, Med","doi":"10.1002/aet2.11028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>There is a concern that provide increased extraneous cognitive load when paired with residents on shift. However, this may be offset by the decrease in extraneous load they may provide to the residents they are paired with by offloading basic patient care tasks. We hypothesized that these forces may not be balanced.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a retrospective observational analysis of PGY-2 emergency medicine residents and junior medical students at a single academic emergency department (ED) in the Midwest. A series of efficiency metrics (relative value unit [RVUs], patients per hour [PPH], time to note completion, and resident assignment to disposition [RATD]) as well as one quality metric (number of return ED visits; “bouncebacks”) were compared for resident shifts in which a student was paired with the resident as well those in which no student was paired utilizing a regression model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 1844 records met the inclusion criteria (214 shifts with a paired medical student and 1630 without). After covariates were adjusted for, medical student shift status was a statistically significant predictor of increases in PPH (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) and RVUs (<i>p</i> = 0.0161) but was not significantly associated with RATD (<i>p</i> = 0.6941), log-time to note completion (<i>p</i> = 0.1604), or bounceback status (<i>p</i> = 0.9840). Shifts where residents were paired with medical students were predicted to see an additional 1.131 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.660–1.602) PPH and produce an additional 1.923 RVUs (95% CI 1.130–3.273) per shift relative to shifts without medical students.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>When junior medical students were paired with a PGY-2 resident on ED shifts, there was a significant increase in the PPH and RVUs generated when compared with shifts in which no medical student was paired with them.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"8 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11449807/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.11028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

There is a concern that provide increased extraneous cognitive load when paired with residents on shift. However, this may be offset by the decrease in extraneous load they may provide to the residents they are paired with by offloading basic patient care tasks. We hypothesized that these forces may not be balanced.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective observational analysis of PGY-2 emergency medicine residents and junior medical students at a single academic emergency department (ED) in the Midwest. A series of efficiency metrics (relative value unit [RVUs], patients per hour [PPH], time to note completion, and resident assignment to disposition [RATD]) as well as one quality metric (number of return ED visits; “bouncebacks”) were compared for resident shifts in which a student was paired with the resident as well those in which no student was paired utilizing a regression model.

Results

A total of 1844 records met the inclusion criteria (214 shifts with a paired medical student and 1630 without). After covariates were adjusted for, medical student shift status was a statistically significant predictor of increases in PPH (p < 0.0001) and RVUs (p = 0.0161) but was not significantly associated with RATD (p = 0.6941), log-time to note completion (p = 0.1604), or bounceback status (p = 0.9840). Shifts where residents were paired with medical students were predicted to see an additional 1.131 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.660–1.602) PPH and produce an additional 1.923 RVUs (95% CI 1.130–3.273) per shift relative to shifts without medical students.

Conclusions

When junior medical students were paired with a PGY-2 resident on ED shifts, there was a significant increase in the PPH and RVUs generated when compared with shifts in which no medical student was paired with them.

Abstract Image

PGY-2 急诊科住院医师与早期临床医学学生配对时效率更高。
目标:有人担心,与住院病人配对轮班时会增加额外的认知负担。然而,通过减轻基本的患者护理任务,他们可能会减少与住院患者配对时的额外负担,这可能会抵消他们的额外负担。我们假设这些力量可能并不平衡:我们对美国中西部地区一家学术性急诊科(ED)的 PGY-2 急诊科住院医师和初级医学生进行了回顾性观察分析。利用回归模型比较了有学生与住院医师配对的住院班和没有学生配对的住院班的一系列效率指标(相对价值单位[RVUs]、每小时病人数[PPH]、完成记录的时间和住院医师分配到处置[RATD])和一个质量指标(急诊科回访次数;"反弹"):共有 1844 份记录符合纳入标准(214 个有医学生配对的班次和 1630 个没有医学生配对的班次)。在对协变量进行调整后,医学生轮班情况对 PPH 的增加有显著的统计学预测作用(p p = 0.0161),但与 RATD(p = 0.6941)、完成记录的对数时间(p = 0.1604)或反弹状态(p = 0.9840)无显著关联。与没有医科学生的班次相比,住院医师与医科学生配对的班次预计每班次会多收治 1.131 例 PPH(95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.660-1.602),多产生 1.923 个 RVUs(95% CI 1.130-3.273):当初级医学生与一名 PGY-2 级住院医师在急诊室轮班时配对,与没有医学生配对的轮班相比,所产生的 PPH 和 RVU 有显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信