Using high-repeatable radiomic features improves the cross-institutional generalization of prognostic model in esophageal squamous cell cancer receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jie Gong, Qifeng Wang, Jie Li, Zhi Yang, Jiang Zhang, Xinzhi Teng, Hongfei Sun, Jing Cai, Lina Zhao
{"title":"Using high-repeatable radiomic features improves the cross-institutional generalization of prognostic model in esophageal squamous cell cancer receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy.","authors":"Jie Gong, Qifeng Wang, Jie Li, Zhi Yang, Jiang Zhang, Xinzhi Teng, Hongfei Sun, Jing Cai, Lina Zhao","doi":"10.1186/s13244-024-01816-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Repeatability is crucial for ensuring the generalizability and clinical utility of radiomics-based prognostic models. This study aims to investigate the repeatability of radiomic feature (RF) and its impact on the cross-institutional generalizability of the prognostic model for predicting local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) in esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) receiving definitive (chemo) radiotherapy (dCRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine hundred and twelve patients from two hospitals were included as training and external validation sets, respectively. Image perturbations were applied to contrast-enhanced computed tomography to generate perturbed images. Six thousand five hundred ten RFs from different feature types, bin widths, and filters were extracted from the original and perturbed images separately to evaluate RF repeatability by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The high-repeatable and low-repeatable RF groups grouped by the median ICC were further analyzed separately by feature selection and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model for predicting LRFS and OS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>First-order statistical features were more repeatable than texture features (median ICC: 0.70 vs 0.42-0.62). RFs from LoG had better repeatability than that of wavelet (median ICC: 0.70-0.84 vs 0.14-0.64). Features with smaller bin widths had higher repeatability (median ICC of 8-128: 0.65-0.47). For both LRFS and OS, the performance of the models based on high- and low-repeatable RFs remained stable in the training set with similar C-index (LRFS: 0.65 vs 0.67, p = 0.958; OS: 0.64 vs 0.65, p = 0.651), while the performance of the model based on the low-repeatable group was significantly lower than that based on the high-repeatable group in the external validation set (LRFS: 0.61 vs 0.67, p = 0.013; OS: 0.56 vs 0.63, p = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Applying high-repeatable RFs in modeling could safeguard the cross-institutional generalizability of the prognostic model in ESCC.</p><p><strong>Critical relevance statement: </strong>The exploration of repeatable RFs in different diseases and different types of imaging is conducive to promoting the proper use of radiomics in clinical research.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>The repeatability of RFs impacts the generalizability of the radiomic model. The high-repeatable RFs safeguard the cross-institutional generalizability of the model. Smaller bin width helps improve the repeatability of RFs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13639,"journal":{"name":"Insights into Imaging","volume":"15 1","pages":"239"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11458848/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insights into Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01816-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Repeatability is crucial for ensuring the generalizability and clinical utility of radiomics-based prognostic models. This study aims to investigate the repeatability of radiomic feature (RF) and its impact on the cross-institutional generalizability of the prognostic model for predicting local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) in esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) receiving definitive (chemo) radiotherapy (dCRT).

Methods: Nine hundred and twelve patients from two hospitals were included as training and external validation sets, respectively. Image perturbations were applied to contrast-enhanced computed tomography to generate perturbed images. Six thousand five hundred ten RFs from different feature types, bin widths, and filters were extracted from the original and perturbed images separately to evaluate RF repeatability by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The high-repeatable and low-repeatable RF groups grouped by the median ICC were further analyzed separately by feature selection and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model for predicting LRFS and OS.

Results: First-order statistical features were more repeatable than texture features (median ICC: 0.70 vs 0.42-0.62). RFs from LoG had better repeatability than that of wavelet (median ICC: 0.70-0.84 vs 0.14-0.64). Features with smaller bin widths had higher repeatability (median ICC of 8-128: 0.65-0.47). For both LRFS and OS, the performance of the models based on high- and low-repeatable RFs remained stable in the training set with similar C-index (LRFS: 0.65 vs 0.67, p = 0.958; OS: 0.64 vs 0.65, p = 0.651), while the performance of the model based on the low-repeatable group was significantly lower than that based on the high-repeatable group in the external validation set (LRFS: 0.61 vs 0.67, p = 0.013; OS: 0.56 vs 0.63, p = 0.013).

Conclusions: Applying high-repeatable RFs in modeling could safeguard the cross-institutional generalizability of the prognostic model in ESCC.

Critical relevance statement: The exploration of repeatable RFs in different diseases and different types of imaging is conducive to promoting the proper use of radiomics in clinical research.

Key points: The repeatability of RFs impacts the generalizability of the radiomic model. The high-repeatable RFs safeguard the cross-institutional generalizability of the model. Smaller bin width helps improve the repeatability of RFs.

使用高重复性放射学特征可提高接受明确放化疗的食管鳞状细胞癌预后模型的跨机构通用性。
目的:可重复性对于确保基于放射组学的预后模型的普适性和临床实用性至关重要。本研究旨在探讨放射组学特征(RF)的可重复性及其对预测接受确定性(化疗)放疗(dCRT)的食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)无局部复发生存期(LRFS)和总生存期(OS)预后模型的跨机构可推广性的影响:方法:将两家医院的 912 名患者分别作为训练集和外部验证集。对对比增强计算机断层扫描进行图像扰动,生成扰动图像。分别从原始图像和扰动图像中提取了六千五百一十个来自不同特征类型、分区宽度和滤波器的射频,通过类内相关系数(ICC)评估射频的重复性。通过特征选择和预测LRFS和OS的多变量Cox比例危险回归模型,进一步分析了按ICC中位数分组的高重复率和低重复率RF组:一阶统计特征的重复性高于纹理特征(中位数ICC:0.70 vs 0.42-0.62)。LoG的RF比小波的RF具有更好的重复性(中位数ICC:0.70-0.84 vs 0.14-0.64)。二进制宽度较小的特征重复性更高(8-128的中位ICC:0.65-0.47)。对于 LRFS 和 OS,基于高重复率 RF 和低重复率 RF 的模型在训练集中的性能保持稳定,C 指数相似(LRFS:0.65 vs 0.67,p = 0.958;OS:0.64 vs 0.65,p = 0.651),而在外部验证集中,基于低重复率组的模型性能明显低于基于高重复率组的模型(LRFS:0.61 vs 0.67,p = 0.013;OS:0.56 vs 0.63,p = 0.013):结论:在建模中应用可重复性高的RFs可保障ESCC预后模型的跨机构通用性:在不同疾病和不同成像类型中探索可重复性射频,有利于促进放射组学在临床研究中的合理应用:RFs的可重复性会影响放射组学模型的可推广性。可重复性高的射频可保障模型的跨机构通用性。较小的仓宽有助于提高射频重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Insights into Imaging
Insights into Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
182
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Insights into Imaging (I³) is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. All content published in the journal is freely available online to anyone, anywhere! I³ continuously updates scientific knowledge and progress in best-practice standards in radiology through the publication of original articles and state-of-the-art reviews and opinions, along with recommendations and statements from the leading radiological societies in Europe. Founded by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), I³ creates a platform for educational material, guidelines and recommendations, and a forum for topics of controversy. A balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes I³ an indispensable source for current information in this field. I³ is owned by the ESR, however authors retain copyright to their article according to the Creative Commons Attribution License (see Copyright and License Agreement). All articles can be read, redistributed and reused for free, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. The open access fees (article-processing charges) for this journal are kindly sponsored by ESR for all Members. The journal went open access in 2012, which means that all articles published since then are freely available online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信