Preferred and Actual Places of Death Among Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Single-centre Cohort Study in Japan.

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Indian Journal of Palliative Care Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-23 DOI:10.25259/IJPC_133_2024
Tomoo Ikari, Yusuke Hiratsuka, Takayuki Oishi, Mitsunori Miyashita, Tatsuya Morita, Jennifer W Mack, Yoshinari Okada, Natsuko Chiba, Chikashi Ishioka, Akira Inoue
{"title":"Preferred and Actual Places of Death Among Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Single-centre Cohort Study in Japan.","authors":"Tomoo Ikari, Yusuke Hiratsuka, Takayuki Oishi, Mitsunori Miyashita, Tatsuya Morita, Jennifer W Mack, Yoshinari Okada, Natsuko Chiba, Chikashi Ishioka, Akira Inoue","doi":"10.25259/IJPC_133_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Achieving a 'good death' is one of the important goals of palliative care. Providing goal-concordant care and an environment tailored to the patient's preferences can contribute to a 'good death'. However, the concordance rate between the preferred and actual places of death among advanced cancer patients in Japan is less explored. This study aimed to identify the concordance between patients' preferred and actual places of death and the associated factors among patients with advanced cancer in Japan.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients with advanced cancer who underwent chemotherapy at Tohoku University Hospital between January 2015 and January 2016 were enrolled and followed up for 5 years. The enrolled patients were asked about their preference for their place of death. The response options were: \"Own home,\" \"General ward\" and \"Palliative care unit (PCU).\" We compared the actual place of death with the patient's preference through a follow-up review of the medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 157 patients with advanced cancer were enrolled between January 2015 and January 2016. Of these patients, 22.9% (11/48) died at home according to their preference, 64.0% (16/25) in the general ward and 37.9% (11/29) in the PCU. Only thirty-seven (37.3%) patients died where they wanted, based on the comparison between patients' preferences and actual places of death.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The concordance rate between the preferred and actual places of death is not high in Japan. Improving concordance between patients' preferences and actual places of death has the potential to improve end-of-life care.</p>","PeriodicalId":13319,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Palliative Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11450858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/IJPC_133_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Achieving a 'good death' is one of the important goals of palliative care. Providing goal-concordant care and an environment tailored to the patient's preferences can contribute to a 'good death'. However, the concordance rate between the preferred and actual places of death among advanced cancer patients in Japan is less explored. This study aimed to identify the concordance between patients' preferred and actual places of death and the associated factors among patients with advanced cancer in Japan.

Materials and methods: Patients with advanced cancer who underwent chemotherapy at Tohoku University Hospital between January 2015 and January 2016 were enrolled and followed up for 5 years. The enrolled patients were asked about their preference for their place of death. The response options were: "Own home," "General ward" and "Palliative care unit (PCU)." We compared the actual place of death with the patient's preference through a follow-up review of the medical records.

Results: A total of 157 patients with advanced cancer were enrolled between January 2015 and January 2016. Of these patients, 22.9% (11/48) died at home according to their preference, 64.0% (16/25) in the general ward and 37.9% (11/29) in the PCU. Only thirty-seven (37.3%) patients died where they wanted, based on the comparison between patients' preferences and actual places of death.

Conclusion: The concordance rate between the preferred and actual places of death is not high in Japan. Improving concordance between patients' preferences and actual places of death has the potential to improve end-of-life care.

晚期癌症患者的首选和实际死亡地点:日本单中心队列研究》。
目标:实现 "美好的死亡 "是姑息关怀的重要目标之一。提供目标一致的护理和符合患者偏好的环境有助于实现 "美好的死亡"。然而,在日本,晚期癌症患者首选死亡地点与实际死亡地点的吻合率却鲜有人问津。本研究旨在确定日本晚期癌症患者首选死亡地点与实际死亡地点之间的一致性以及相关因素:研究人员招募了 2015 年 1 月至 2016 年 1 月期间在东北大学医院接受化疗的晚期癌症患者,并对其进行了为期 5 年的随访。入组患者被问及他们对死亡地点的偏好。回答选项为"自己家"、"普通病房 "和 "姑息治疗病房(PCU)"。我们通过对医疗记录的后续审查,将实际死亡地点与患者的偏好进行了比较:2015年1月至2016年1月期间,共有157名晚期癌症患者入选。其中,22.9%(11/48)的患者根据自己的偏好在家中死亡,64.0%(16/25)的患者在普通病房死亡,37.9%(11/29)的患者在 PCU 死亡。根据患者选择的死亡地点和实际死亡地点之间的比较,只有 377 名(37.3%)患者在自己希望的地方死亡:结论:在日本,首选死亡地点与实际死亡地点的一致率不高。结论:在日本,首选死亡地点与实际死亡地点之间的一致率不高。提高患者首选死亡地点与实际死亡地点之间的一致率有望改善临终关怀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Palliative Care
Indian Journal of Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Welcome to the website of the Indian Journal of Palliative Care. You have free full text access to recent issues of the journal. The links connect you to •guidelines and systematic reviews in palliative care and oncology •a directory of palliative care programmes in India and IAPC membership •Palliative Care Formulary, book reviews and other educational material •guidance on statistical tests and medical writing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信