Medical Cannabis Dosing Trajectories of Patients: Evidence From Sales Data.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Alexandra F Kritikos, Myfanwy Graham, Dominic Hodgkin, Rosalie Liccardo Pacula
{"title":"Medical Cannabis Dosing Trajectories of Patients: Evidence From Sales Data.","authors":"Alexandra F Kritikos, Myfanwy Graham, Dominic Hodgkin, Rosalie Liccardo Pacula","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Medical cannabis use is rising with limited high-quality clinical trial data to guide dosing. This study relies on real-world, longitudinal medical cannabis purchase data to provide information on Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) dosing trends for patients with qualifying medical conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of purchases by 16,727 patients obtaining medical cannabis from dispensaries located in New York between 2016 and 2019, recorded in point-of-sale data. Group-based trajectory modeling was used to identify clusters of patients following similar progressions in dosing of THC and CBD over time. χ<sup>2</sup> tests were performed to identify which patient characteristics and qualifying medical conditions were associated with membership in each trajectory group.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Six trajectory groups were identified that described different patterns in the THC and CBD doses that patients purchased over the whole time period. For THC, the majority of patients (62.6%) purchased a steady amount but at different levels: consistently low (4.1 mg) or moderate (7.4 mg). Three groups, representing 22.0% together, exhibited doses that either fluctuate or constantly increase over time (5-20 mg). A final group of patients (15.8%) exhibited constant decrease in dose from 11 to 5 mg. For CBD, the data show similar trajectories, but at the generally higher values (4-16 mg). Patients with chronic pain, neuropathy, and cancer were overrepresented in groups where higher doses of THC were purchased over time. Patients with epilepsy had a higher representation in groups with higher doses of CBD across time.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Results suggest heterogeneous dosing patterns and trajectories in the use of medical cannabis by patients with different medical conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.09.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Medical cannabis use is rising with limited high-quality clinical trial data to guide dosing. This study relies on real-world, longitudinal medical cannabis purchase data to provide information on Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) dosing trends for patients with qualifying medical conditions.

Methods: A retrospective study of purchases by 16,727 patients obtaining medical cannabis from dispensaries located in New York between 2016 and 2019, recorded in point-of-sale data. Group-based trajectory modeling was used to identify clusters of patients following similar progressions in dosing of THC and CBD over time. χ2 tests were performed to identify which patient characteristics and qualifying medical conditions were associated with membership in each trajectory group.

Findings: Six trajectory groups were identified that described different patterns in the THC and CBD doses that patients purchased over the whole time period. For THC, the majority of patients (62.6%) purchased a steady amount but at different levels: consistently low (4.1 mg) or moderate (7.4 mg). Three groups, representing 22.0% together, exhibited doses that either fluctuate or constantly increase over time (5-20 mg). A final group of patients (15.8%) exhibited constant decrease in dose from 11 to 5 mg. For CBD, the data show similar trajectories, but at the generally higher values (4-16 mg). Patients with chronic pain, neuropathy, and cancer were overrepresented in groups where higher doses of THC were purchased over time. Patients with epilepsy had a higher representation in groups with higher doses of CBD across time.

Implications: Results suggest heterogeneous dosing patterns and trajectories in the use of medical cannabis by patients with different medical conditions.

医用大麻患者的用药轨迹:来自销售数据的证据。
目的:医用大麻的使用在不断增加,但用于指导剂量的高质量临床试验数据却很有限。本研究利用真实世界的纵向医用大麻购买数据,为符合医疗条件的患者提供有关Δ-9-四氢大麻酚(THC)和大麻二酚(CBD)剂量趋势的信息:对 2016 年至 2019 年期间从纽约药房购买医用大麻的 16727 名患者的购买情况进行了回顾性研究,这些数据记录在销售点数据中。采用基于群体的轨迹建模来识别随着时间推移在四氢大麻酚和大麻二酚剂量上有类似进展的患者群组。进行了χ2检验,以确定哪些患者特征和合格医疗条件与每个轨迹组的成员资格相关:研究发现:六个轨迹组描述了患者在整个时间段内购买 THC 和 CBD 剂量的不同模式。就四氢大麻酚而言,大多数患者(62.6%)的购买量保持稳定,但剂量水平各不相同:持续低剂量(4.1 毫克)或中剂量(7.4 毫克)。三组患者(共占 22.0%)的剂量随时间波动或持续增加(5-20 毫克)。最后一组患者(15.8%)的剂量从 11 毫克持续减少到 5 毫克。对于 CBD,数据显示了类似的轨迹,但剂量普遍较高(4-16 毫克)。慢性疼痛、神经病变和癌症患者在购买较高剂量四氢大麻酚的群体中比例较高。癫痫患者在不同时期购买较高剂量 CBD 的群体中比例较高:结果表明,不同病症的患者使用医用大麻的剂量模式和轨迹各不相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical therapeutics
Clinical therapeutics 医学-药学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
154
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Therapeutics provides peer-reviewed, rapid publication of recent developments in drug and other therapies as well as in diagnostics, pharmacoeconomics, health policy, treatment outcomes, and innovations in drug and biologics research. In addition Clinical Therapeutics features updates on specific topics collated by expert Topic Editors. Clinical Therapeutics is read by a large international audience of scientists and clinicians in a variety of research, academic, and clinical practice settings. Articles are indexed by all major biomedical abstracting databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信