Structural insights into the mechanism underlying the dual cofactor specificity of glyoxylate reductase from Acetobacter aceti in the β-hydroxyacid dehydrogenase family
{"title":"Structural insights into the mechanism underlying the dual cofactor specificity of glyoxylate reductase from Acetobacter aceti in the β-hydroxyacid dehydrogenase family","authors":"Toma Rani Majumder , Takuya Yoshizawa , Masao Inoue , Riku Aono , Hiroyoshi Matsumura , Hisaaki Mihara","doi":"10.1016/j.bbapap.2024.141051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The β-hydroxyacid dehydrogenase family exhibits diverse cofactor preferences: some enzymes favor NAD, others favor NADP, and a subset can utilize both NAD and NADPH. Glyoxylate reductase from <em>Acetobacter aceti</em> JCM 20276 (AacGR) exhibits a dual cofactor specificity for NADPH and NADH in its catalytic reduction of glyoxylate to glycolate. In contrast to conventional cofactor-discriminating motifs, NRX and DXX, found in NADP- and NAD-specific enzymes, respectively, AacGR has a TPS motif in the equivalent position. Here we report X-ray crystallographic analysis of AacGR in its ligand-free form, and in complexes with NADPH and NADH, revealing critical interactions: Ser41 of the TPS motif interacted with the 2′-phosphate group of NADPH, while no analogous interaction occurred with the ribose hydroxy groups of NADH. Moreover, the TPS motif resided within a characteristic β-turn-like structure adjacent to a long flexible loop. Site-directed mutagenesis and kinetic analyses suggest that Ser41 facilitates NADPH binding, while the lack of a direct interaction of the TPS motif with NADH may allow for NADH utilization. The conformational dynamics of the TPS-containing β-turn-like structure along with the flexible loop likely govern the dual cofactor specificity and catalytic turnover of AacGR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8760,"journal":{"name":"Biochimica et biophysica acta. Proteins and proteomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochimica et biophysica acta. Proteins and proteomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S157096392400058X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The β-hydroxyacid dehydrogenase family exhibits diverse cofactor preferences: some enzymes favor NAD, others favor NADP, and a subset can utilize both NAD and NADPH. Glyoxylate reductase from Acetobacter aceti JCM 20276 (AacGR) exhibits a dual cofactor specificity for NADPH and NADH in its catalytic reduction of glyoxylate to glycolate. In contrast to conventional cofactor-discriminating motifs, NRX and DXX, found in NADP- and NAD-specific enzymes, respectively, AacGR has a TPS motif in the equivalent position. Here we report X-ray crystallographic analysis of AacGR in its ligand-free form, and in complexes with NADPH and NADH, revealing critical interactions: Ser41 of the TPS motif interacted with the 2′-phosphate group of NADPH, while no analogous interaction occurred with the ribose hydroxy groups of NADH. Moreover, the TPS motif resided within a characteristic β-turn-like structure adjacent to a long flexible loop. Site-directed mutagenesis and kinetic analyses suggest that Ser41 facilitates NADPH binding, while the lack of a direct interaction of the TPS motif with NADH may allow for NADH utilization. The conformational dynamics of the TPS-containing β-turn-like structure along with the flexible loop likely govern the dual cofactor specificity and catalytic turnover of AacGR.
期刊介绍:
BBA Proteins and Proteomics covers protein structure conformation and dynamics; protein folding; protein-ligand interactions; enzyme mechanisms, models and kinetics; protein physical properties and spectroscopy; and proteomics and bioinformatics analyses of protein structure, protein function, or protein regulation.