Andrea Salas-Ortiz, Francesco Longo, Karl Claxton, James Lomas
{"title":"Unpacking the care-related quality of life effect of England's publicly funded adult social care. A panel data analysis.","authors":"Andrea Salas-Ortiz, Francesco Longo, Karl Claxton, James Lomas","doi":"10.1002/hec.4907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adult Social Care (ASC) is the publicly-funded long-term care program in England that provides support with activities of daily living to people experiencing mental and/or physical challenges. Existing evidence suggests that ASC expenditure improves service users' care-related quality of life (CRQoL). However, less is known about the channels through which this effect exists and the effect on outcomes other than CRQoL. We fill this gap by analyzing survey data on ASC service users who received long-term support from 2014/15 to 2019/20 using panel data instrumental variable methods. We find that the beneficial impact of ASC expenditure on the CRQoL of both new and existing users is mostly driven by users aged 18-64 without any learning disability and users with no learning disability aged 65 or older receiving community-based ASC. Moreover, control over daily life, occupation, and social participation are the CRQoL domains that are improved the most. We also find that ASC expenditure has a beneficial effect on several other outcomes beyond CRQoL for both new and existing users including user satisfaction and experience, the ability to carry out activities of daily living independently, whether their home is designed around needs, accessibility to local places, general health, and mental health through reduced anxiety and depression. Greater ASC expenditure, however, does not address the need for other forms of support such as unpaid informal and privately-funded care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12847,"journal":{"name":"Health economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4907","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Adult Social Care (ASC) is the publicly-funded long-term care program in England that provides support with activities of daily living to people experiencing mental and/or physical challenges. Existing evidence suggests that ASC expenditure improves service users' care-related quality of life (CRQoL). However, less is known about the channels through which this effect exists and the effect on outcomes other than CRQoL. We fill this gap by analyzing survey data on ASC service users who received long-term support from 2014/15 to 2019/20 using panel data instrumental variable methods. We find that the beneficial impact of ASC expenditure on the CRQoL of both new and existing users is mostly driven by users aged 18-64 without any learning disability and users with no learning disability aged 65 or older receiving community-based ASC. Moreover, control over daily life, occupation, and social participation are the CRQoL domains that are improved the most. We also find that ASC expenditure has a beneficial effect on several other outcomes beyond CRQoL for both new and existing users including user satisfaction and experience, the ability to carry out activities of daily living independently, whether their home is designed around needs, accessibility to local places, general health, and mental health through reduced anxiety and depression. Greater ASC expenditure, however, does not address the need for other forms of support such as unpaid informal and privately-funded care.
期刊介绍:
This Journal publishes articles on all aspects of health economics: theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy from the economic perspective. Its scope includes the determinants of health and its definition and valuation, as well as the demand for and supply of health care; planning and market mechanisms; micro-economic evaluation of individual procedures and treatments; and evaluation of the performance of health care systems.
Contributions should typically be original and innovative. As a rule, the Journal does not include routine applications of cost-effectiveness analysis, discrete choice experiments and costing analyses.
Editorials are regular features, these should be concise and topical. Occasionally commissioned reviews are published and special issues bring together contributions on a single topic. Health Economics Letters facilitate rapid exchange of views on topical issues. Contributions related to problems in both developed and developing countries are welcome.