The meaning of obstetric violence experiences: A qualitative content analysis of the Break the Silence Campaign

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Lorraine M. Garcia , Jacqueline Jones , Jean Scandlyn , E. Brie Thumm , Sara Cohen Shabot
{"title":"The meaning of obstetric violence experiences: A qualitative content analysis of the Break the Silence Campaign","authors":"Lorraine M. Garcia ,&nbsp;Jacqueline Jones ,&nbsp;Jean Scandlyn ,&nbsp;E. Brie Thumm ,&nbsp;Sara Cohen Shabot","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Obstetric violence involves the mistreatment, disrespect, and abuse of birthing people and the problem has been recognized in healthcare systems worldwide. Obstetric violence is a gendered, sex-specific form of violence against women that is a public health problem and a violation of human rights. There are an unknowable number of online posts and social media messages that describe obstetric violence experiences. There are no known studies about self-published experiences of obstetric violence in the US maternity care system.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To understand the meaning of obstetric violence experiences in the US maternity care system from a naturally occurring, purposive sample.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A secondary analysis of the textual data from the original Break the Silence social media campaign using qualitative content analysis. The theory of social justice in nursing provided a theoretical framework. A healthcare systems approach was used for a wide-angle view of the multidirectional structure, processes, and outcome of obstetric violence.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>The study setting is the public Facebook page where the Break the Silence social media campaign can be seen. Break the Silence was an online activism response to the problem of obstetric violence in the US maternity care system with signboard messages posted from 31 known US states. The setting is bounded by the digital page where the campaign is published.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>There were 139 participants, and 11 of them posted more than one signboard message. Most participants were birthing people (<em>n</em> = 125) followed by doulas (<em>n</em> = 10).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Krippendorff's methodology for qualitative content analysis was applied to 156 signboard messages posted on Break the Silence from 2014 to 2016. Qualitative content analysis was supported by Atlas.ti 23.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four themes illustrated the meaning of obstetric violence in US maternity care: 1) pregnancy and birth as a battle with healthcare providers and the healthcare system, 2) sacrifice of the maternal body normalized and assumed as a gender stereotype, 3) disrupted rites of passage from childbirth, and 4) abuse of fiduciary power by healthcare providers.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study demonstrated thematic meanings for the experience of obstetric violence in US maternity care with a healthcare systems approach that included structural and organizational considerations to increase understanding. Categories and forms of obstetric violence from the existing literature were expanded and strengthened by findings from this study. Themes were validated in principle with consistency in findings across the international evidence base on obstetric violence.</div><div><strong>Tweetable abstract</strong>: The meaning of #obstetricviolence experiences is interpersonal and structural with thematic consistency across international studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":"160 ","pages":"Article 104911"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748924002244","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Obstetric violence involves the mistreatment, disrespect, and abuse of birthing people and the problem has been recognized in healthcare systems worldwide. Obstetric violence is a gendered, sex-specific form of violence against women that is a public health problem and a violation of human rights. There are an unknowable number of online posts and social media messages that describe obstetric violence experiences. There are no known studies about self-published experiences of obstetric violence in the US maternity care system.

Objective

To understand the meaning of obstetric violence experiences in the US maternity care system from a naturally occurring, purposive sample.

Design

A secondary analysis of the textual data from the original Break the Silence social media campaign using qualitative content analysis. The theory of social justice in nursing provided a theoretical framework. A healthcare systems approach was used for a wide-angle view of the multidirectional structure, processes, and outcome of obstetric violence.

Setting

The study setting is the public Facebook page where the Break the Silence social media campaign can be seen. Break the Silence was an online activism response to the problem of obstetric violence in the US maternity care system with signboard messages posted from 31 known US states. The setting is bounded by the digital page where the campaign is published.

Participants

There were 139 participants, and 11 of them posted more than one signboard message. Most participants were birthing people (n = 125) followed by doulas (n = 10).

Methods

Krippendorff's methodology for qualitative content analysis was applied to 156 signboard messages posted on Break the Silence from 2014 to 2016. Qualitative content analysis was supported by Atlas.ti 23.

Results

Four themes illustrated the meaning of obstetric violence in US maternity care: 1) pregnancy and birth as a battle with healthcare providers and the healthcare system, 2) sacrifice of the maternal body normalized and assumed as a gender stereotype, 3) disrupted rites of passage from childbirth, and 4) abuse of fiduciary power by healthcare providers.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated thematic meanings for the experience of obstetric violence in US maternity care with a healthcare systems approach that included structural and organizational considerations to increase understanding. Categories and forms of obstetric violence from the existing literature were expanded and strengthened by findings from this study. Themes were validated in principle with consistency in findings across the international evidence base on obstetric violence.
Tweetable abstract: The meaning of #obstetricviolence experiences is interpersonal and structural with thematic consistency across international studies.
产科暴力经历的意义:对 "打破沉默运动 "的定性内容分析。
背景:产科暴力涉及对分娩者的虐待、不尊重和凌辱,这一问题已被全世界的医疗系统所认识。产科暴力是一种针对妇女的性别暴力,是公共卫生问题,也是对人权的侵犯。描述产科暴力经历的网上帖子和社交媒体信息数量难以估量。目前还没有关于美国产科护理系统中自行发布的产科暴力经历的已知研究:从自然发生的目的性样本中了解美国孕产妇护理系统中产科暴力经历的含义:设计:使用定性内容分析法对原始 "打破沉默 "社交媒体活动的文本数据进行二次分析。护理中的社会公正理论提供了一个理论框架。采用医疗保健系统方法,从广角审视产科暴力的多向结构、过程和结果:研究环境是 "打破沉默 "社交媒体活动的 Facebook 公共页面。打破沉默 "是针对美国孕产妇护理系统中的产科暴力问题而发起的一项在线活动,在美国 31 个已知的州发布了招牌信息。环境以发布活动的数字页面为界:共有 139 名参与者,其中 11 人张贴了不止一条招牌信息。大多数参与者是分娩者(125 人),其次是助产士(10 人):克里彭多夫的定性内容分析方法适用于 2014 年至 2016 年期间在 "打破沉默 "网站上发布的 156 条招牌信息。定性内容分析由 Atlas.ti 23 支持:四个主题说明了美国孕产妇护理中产科暴力的含义:1)怀孕和分娩是与医疗服务提供者和医疗系统的斗争;2)牺牲产妇的身体正常化并被假定为一种性别刻板印象;3)分娩的成年仪式被破坏;4)医疗服务提供者滥用信托权力:本研究以医疗保健系统的方法展示了美国孕产妇护理中产科暴力经历的主题含义,包括结构和组织方面的考虑,以加深理解。本研究的结果扩展并加强了现有文献中产科暴力的类别和形式。Tweetable摘要:#产科暴力经历的意义是人际和结构性的,在国际研究中具有主题一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
181
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Studies (IJNS) is a highly respected journal that has been publishing original peer-reviewed articles since 1963. It provides a forum for original research and scholarship about health care delivery, organisation, management, workforce, policy, and research methods relevant to nursing, midwifery, and other health related professions. The journal aims to support evidence informed policy and practice by publishing research, systematic and other scholarly reviews, critical discussion, and commentary of the highest standard. The IJNS is indexed in major databases including PubMed, Medline, Thomson Reuters - Science Citation Index, Scopus, Thomson Reuters - Social Science Citation Index, CINAHL, and the BNI (British Nursing Index).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信