Clinical decision-making during childbirth in health facilities from the perspectives of labouring women, relatives, and health care providers: A scoping review
{"title":"Clinical decision-making during childbirth in health facilities from the perspectives of labouring women, relatives, and health care providers: A scoping review","authors":"Signe Egenberg , Gry Skogheim , Margrethe Tangerud , Anne-Marie Sluijs , Yolentha M. Slootweg , Heidi Elvemo , Mariam Barabara , Ingela Lundgren","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Problem</h3><div>For health care providers to ensure appropriate decision-making in clinical settings during childbirth, facilitators and barriers must be identified.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Women who experience a sense of control by participating in the decision-making process, are more likely to have a positive birth experience. However, decision-making may involve hierarchies of close observation and control.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The aim of the scoping review was to map and summarise existing literature on the process of clinical decision-making during childbirth from the perspective of labouring women, relatives and health care providers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We carried out a scoping review in line with Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. The search identified studies in Scandinavian or English languages from 2010 - Jan 2023 comprising evidence at different levels of the pyramid, resulting in 18.227 hits. Following the PRISMA checklist, the final inclusion comprised 62 papers.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Four main categories summarized the importance of the following factors: 1) Woman-caregiver relationship, with sub-categories The importance of communication and Midwifery care, 2) Consent and legal issues, 3) Organization, with sub-categories Medicalization, Working atmosphere, and Complexity, and 4) Decision-making tools and models, with sub-categories Shared decision-making, and Other tools and models for decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Balancing intuition and expertise of caregivers with evidence-based practices, is crucial to ensure women's participation in decision-making. Furthermore, a trusting relationship between the mother, partner, and health care provider is of utmost importance. Shared decision-making, which appeared to be the primary model for clinical decision-making regardless context, requires reflective practice and is a communication strategy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 104192"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824002754","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Problem
For health care providers to ensure appropriate decision-making in clinical settings during childbirth, facilitators and barriers must be identified.
Background
Women who experience a sense of control by participating in the decision-making process, are more likely to have a positive birth experience. However, decision-making may involve hierarchies of close observation and control.
Aim
The aim of the scoping review was to map and summarise existing literature on the process of clinical decision-making during childbirth from the perspective of labouring women, relatives and health care providers.
Methods
We carried out a scoping review in line with Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. The search identified studies in Scandinavian or English languages from 2010 - Jan 2023 comprising evidence at different levels of the pyramid, resulting in 18.227 hits. Following the PRISMA checklist, the final inclusion comprised 62 papers.
Findings
Four main categories summarized the importance of the following factors: 1) Woman-caregiver relationship, with sub-categories The importance of communication and Midwifery care, 2) Consent and legal issues, 3) Organization, with sub-categories Medicalization, Working atmosphere, and Complexity, and 4) Decision-making tools and models, with sub-categories Shared decision-making, and Other tools and models for decision-making.
Conclusion
Balancing intuition and expertise of caregivers with evidence-based practices, is crucial to ensure women's participation in decision-making. Furthermore, a trusting relationship between the mother, partner, and health care provider is of utmost importance. Shared decision-making, which appeared to be the primary model for clinical decision-making regardless context, requires reflective practice and is a communication strategy.