Pathways to social integration among homeless-experienced adults with serious mental illness: a qualitative perspective.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Melissa Chinchilla, Aaron Lulla, Dylan Agans, Stephanie Chassman, Sonya E Gabrielian, Alexander S Young
{"title":"Pathways to social integration among homeless-experienced adults with serious mental illness: a qualitative perspective.","authors":"Melissa Chinchilla, Aaron Lulla, Dylan Agans, Stephanie Chassman, Sonya E Gabrielian, Alexander S Young","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11678-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social integration (i.e., reciprocal interactions with peers and community members) is a notable challenge for many homeless-experienced adults with serious mental illness (SMI). In this study, we examine a range of housing services offered to homeless-experienced adults with SMI and identify the impacts of supportive services on participants' social integration outcomes, with the goal of improving services in transitional and permanent housing settings for homeless-experienced adults with SMI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through semi-structured interviews with homeless-experienced adults with SMI (n = 30), we examine the impacts of housing and service settings on participants' social integration. Participants received services in a variety of housing settings, including transitional housing with congregate/shared living (n = 10), transitional housing with individual quarters (n = 10), and permanent supportive housing (n = 10).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants expressed caution in developing social relationships, as these could pose barriers to recovery goals (e.g., substance use recovery). For many, social integration was secondary to mental and physical health and/or housing stability goals. Individual quarters gave individuals a place of respite and a sense of control regarding when and with whom they socialized. Meeting recovery goals was strongly related to connecting to and receiving a range of supportive services; interviews suggest that proximity to services was critical for engagement in these resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Programs serving homeless experienced adults with SMI should seek to understand how individuals conceptualize social integration, and how social relationships can either support or hinder participants' recovery journey.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11451229/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11678-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social integration (i.e., reciprocal interactions with peers and community members) is a notable challenge for many homeless-experienced adults with serious mental illness (SMI). In this study, we examine a range of housing services offered to homeless-experienced adults with SMI and identify the impacts of supportive services on participants' social integration outcomes, with the goal of improving services in transitional and permanent housing settings for homeless-experienced adults with SMI.

Methods: Through semi-structured interviews with homeless-experienced adults with SMI (n = 30), we examine the impacts of housing and service settings on participants' social integration. Participants received services in a variety of housing settings, including transitional housing with congregate/shared living (n = 10), transitional housing with individual quarters (n = 10), and permanent supportive housing (n = 10).

Results: Participants expressed caution in developing social relationships, as these could pose barriers to recovery goals (e.g., substance use recovery). For many, social integration was secondary to mental and physical health and/or housing stability goals. Individual quarters gave individuals a place of respite and a sense of control regarding when and with whom they socialized. Meeting recovery goals was strongly related to connecting to and receiving a range of supportive services; interviews suggest that proximity to services was critical for engagement in these resources.

Conclusions: Programs serving homeless experienced adults with SMI should seek to understand how individuals conceptualize social integration, and how social relationships can either support or hinder participants' recovery journey.

无家可归的成年重症精神病患者融入社会的途径:定性视角。
背景:社会融合(即与同伴和社区成员的互惠互动)是许多无家可归的成年重性精神病患者(SMI)面临的一个显著挑战。在本研究中,我们考察了为无家可归的成人重性精神病患者提供的一系列住房服务,并确定了支持性服务对参与者社会融合结果的影响,目的是改善为无家可归的成人重性精神病患者提供的过渡性和永久性住房服务:我们通过对无家可归的成年 SMI 患者(n = 30)进行半结构化访谈,研究住房和服务环境对参与者融入社会的影响。参与者在不同的住房环境中接受服务,包括有集中/共享生活的过渡性住房(10 人)、有个人宿舍的过渡性住房(10 人)和永久性支持住房(10 人):结果:参与者表示要谨慎发展社会关系,因为这可能会对康复目标(如药物使用康复)造成障碍。对许多人来说,社会融合是身心健康和/或住房稳定目标的次要目标。个人宿舍为个人提供了一个喘息的场所,并使他们对何时以及与谁交往有了控制感。实现康复目标与联系和接受一系列支持性服务密切相关;访谈表明,就近获得服务对于参与这些资源至关重要:为患有 SMI 的无家可归成年人提供服务的项目应努力了解个人如何看待社会融合,以及社会关系如何支持或阻碍参与者的康复历程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信