Long-term self-reported attendance in exercise training or lung choir and status of quality of life following initial pulmonary rehabilitation for COPD.

IF 1.3 Q3 REHABILITATION
Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences Pub Date : 2024-09-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fresc.2024.1447765
Mette Kaasgaard, Uffe Bodtger, Søren T Skou, Stephen Clift, Ole Hilberg, Daniel Bech Rasmussen, Anders Løkke
{"title":"Long-term self-reported attendance in exercise training or lung choir and status of quality of life following initial pulmonary rehabilitation for COPD.","authors":"Mette Kaasgaard, Uffe Bodtger, Søren T Skou, Stephen Clift, Ole Hilberg, Daniel Bech Rasmussen, Anders Løkke","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2024.1447765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both adherence rates to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programmes and long-term attendance in exercise training after PR remain a challenge. In our previous randomised controlled trial (RCT), effects were positively associated with a dose-response pattern, regardless of whether PR contained conventional physical exercise training (PExT) or Singing for Lung Health (SLH) as a training modality within a 10 weeks' PR programme for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, long-term status of this RCT cohort remains unknown. In this study, we investigated whether current status (=attendance in supervised exercise training or a lung choir and scoring in quality of life (QoL)) was related to initial PR completion, randomisation, or adherence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected data via telephone, using a researcher-developed questionnaire on current self-reported attendance in supervised exercise training or a lung choir and on perceived benefits of the initial RCT intervention. Additionally, we used COPD-validated questionnaires (primarily: QoL (measure: St George's Respiratory Questionnaire; SGRQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2023 (i.e., mean/median 4.7 years after initial PR), surviving participants were contacted (<i>n</i> = 196; 73% of 270), and 160 (82% of 196) were included. Out of the included participants, 30 (19%) had not completed initial PR. Compared to the initial PR-completers, non-completers reported less current attendance in exercise training or lung choir (24% vs. 46%, <i>p</i> = 0.03) but SGRQ scores were comparable. Yet, those who attended exercise training or lung choir at present (<i>n</i> = 66/160; 41% out of 160) reported better QoL score than those with no current attendance (SGRQ; Attending: 39.9 ± 15.4; Not attending: 43.1 ± 16.7; <i>p</i> = 0.02). Neither having had SLH instead of PExT, nor adherence level during initial PR, was related to current attendance or to QoL scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicates that long-term self-reported attendance and current QoL scores are positively related to initial completion of a PR programme. Surprisingly, neither initial PR content (PExT or SLH) nor initial PR adherence was related to long-term outcomes. We suggest that future PR programmes include special attention to those who do not complete PR to support long-term attendance and QoL status.</p>","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11446877/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2024.1447765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Both adherence rates to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programmes and long-term attendance in exercise training after PR remain a challenge. In our previous randomised controlled trial (RCT), effects were positively associated with a dose-response pattern, regardless of whether PR contained conventional physical exercise training (PExT) or Singing for Lung Health (SLH) as a training modality within a 10 weeks' PR programme for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, long-term status of this RCT cohort remains unknown. In this study, we investigated whether current status (=attendance in supervised exercise training or a lung choir and scoring in quality of life (QoL)) was related to initial PR completion, randomisation, or adherence.

Methods: We collected data via telephone, using a researcher-developed questionnaire on current self-reported attendance in supervised exercise training or a lung choir and on perceived benefits of the initial RCT intervention. Additionally, we used COPD-validated questionnaires (primarily: QoL (measure: St George's Respiratory Questionnaire; SGRQ).

Results: In 2023 (i.e., mean/median 4.7 years after initial PR), surviving participants were contacted (n = 196; 73% of 270), and 160 (82% of 196) were included. Out of the included participants, 30 (19%) had not completed initial PR. Compared to the initial PR-completers, non-completers reported less current attendance in exercise training or lung choir (24% vs. 46%, p = 0.03) but SGRQ scores were comparable. Yet, those who attended exercise training or lung choir at present (n = 66/160; 41% out of 160) reported better QoL score than those with no current attendance (SGRQ; Attending: 39.9 ± 15.4; Not attending: 43.1 ± 16.7; p = 0.02). Neither having had SLH instead of PExT, nor adherence level during initial PR, was related to current attendance or to QoL scores.

Conclusion: This study indicates that long-term self-reported attendance and current QoL scores are positively related to initial completion of a PR programme. Surprisingly, neither initial PR content (PExT or SLH) nor initial PR adherence was related to long-term outcomes. We suggest that future PR programmes include special attention to those who do not complete PR to support long-term attendance and QoL status.

慢性阻塞性肺病初次肺康复治疗后长期自我报告参加运动训练或肺部合唱的情况以及生活质量状况。
背景:肺康复(PR)计划的坚持率和PR后运动训练的长期参加率仍然是一个挑战。在我们之前进行的随机对照试验(RCT)中,在为期 10 周的慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)肺康复计划中,无论肺康复计划是否包含传统的体育锻炼训练(PExT)或 "唱出肺健康"(SLH)作为训练方式,其效果都与剂量反应模式呈正相关。然而,该研究队列的长期状况仍不得而知。在这项研究中,我们调查了当前状况(=参加有指导的运动训练或肺部唱诗班以及生活质量(QoL)评分)是否与最初的PR完成情况、随机化或坚持情况有关:我们通过电话收集数据,使用的是研究人员开发的调查问卷,内容包括目前自我报告的参加运动训练督导或肺部合唱团的情况,以及对初始 RCT 干预的获益感知。此外,我们还使用了经慢性阻塞性肺病验证的调查问卷(主要包括QoL(测量方法:圣乔治呼吸问卷;SGRQ):在 2023 年(即初始 PR 后平均/中位数 4.7 年),我们联系了存活的参与者(n = 196;占 270 人的 73%),并纳入了 160 人(占 196 人的 82%)。在纳入的参与者中,有 30 人(19%)未完成首次 PR。与初次完成 PR 的参与者相比,未完成 PR 的参与者表示目前参加运动训练或肺部合唱的人数较少(24% 对 46%,P = 0.03),但 SGRQ 分数相当。然而,目前参加运动训练或肺部合唱团的人(n = 66/160;160 人中的 41%)的 QoL 评分优于目前未参加者(SGRQ;参加:39.9 ± 15.4;未参加:43.1 ± 16.7;p = 0.02)。是否接受过 SLH 而非 PExT 以及初始 PR 期间的依从性水平均与当前就诊情况或 QoL 分数无关:本研究表明,自我报告的长期出勤率和当前 QoL 分数与 PR 计划的初始完成度呈正相关。令人惊讶的是,最初的 PR 内容(PExT 或 SLH)和最初的 PR 坚持率都与长期结果无关。我们建议,未来的 PR 计划应特别关注那些未完成 PR 的人,以支持他们的长期出勤率和 QoL 状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信