Clinician and patient experiences with shared decision-making to promote daily arm use for individuals with chronic stroke: an exploratory qualitative study.

IF 1.3 Q3 REHABILITATION
Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences Pub Date : 2024-09-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fresc.2024.1414878
Amanda Gahlot, Grace Richardson, Patricia Librea, Grace J Kim
{"title":"Clinician and patient experiences with shared decision-making to promote daily arm use for individuals with chronic stroke: an exploratory qualitative study.","authors":"Amanda Gahlot, Grace Richardson, Patricia Librea, Grace J Kim","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2024.1414878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the attitudes and experiences of clinicians and individuals with chronic stroke on the use of shared decision-making (SDM) during upper extremity rehabilitation to improve daily arm use in the home environment. Specifically, we aimed to describe clinician and client perspectives regarding the facilitators and barriers to using SDM within the context of a self-directed upper extremity intervention for individuals living in the community with chronic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected within the context of an interventional study examining the feasibility of the Use My Arm-Remote intervention. Focus group interviews were conducted with the clinicians (<i>n</i> = 3) providing the intervention and individual semi-structured interviews with the participants (<i>n</i> = 15) of the study. All interview data were collected after the end of the intervention period. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The following themes were identified: (1) Equal partnership; (2) Enhancing clinician confidence; and (3) This is different. Facilitators and barriers were identified within each theme. Key facilitators for clinicians were competence with SDM and patient characteristics; while facilitators for patients were open and trusting relationships with clinicians and personalized experience. Key barriers to SDM for clinicians were lack of expertise in SDM and participant buy in; while patients identified a lack of foundational knowledge of stroke rehabilitation as a potential barrier.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Key barriers were analyzed using the consolidated framework for advancing implementation science to interpret results and identify strategies for enhancing the implementation of SDM in a virtual setting. The CFIR-ERIC tool highlighted the need for targeted educational meetings and materials to address the training and educational needs of both clinicians and patients for future iterations of this intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11446894/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2024.1414878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the attitudes and experiences of clinicians and individuals with chronic stroke on the use of shared decision-making (SDM) during upper extremity rehabilitation to improve daily arm use in the home environment. Specifically, we aimed to describe clinician and client perspectives regarding the facilitators and barriers to using SDM within the context of a self-directed upper extremity intervention for individuals living in the community with chronic stroke.

Methods: Data were collected within the context of an interventional study examining the feasibility of the Use My Arm-Remote intervention. Focus group interviews were conducted with the clinicians (n = 3) providing the intervention and individual semi-structured interviews with the participants (n = 15) of the study. All interview data were collected after the end of the intervention period. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: The following themes were identified: (1) Equal partnership; (2) Enhancing clinician confidence; and (3) This is different. Facilitators and barriers were identified within each theme. Key facilitators for clinicians were competence with SDM and patient characteristics; while facilitators for patients were open and trusting relationships with clinicians and personalized experience. Key barriers to SDM for clinicians were lack of expertise in SDM and participant buy in; while patients identified a lack of foundational knowledge of stroke rehabilitation as a potential barrier.

Conclusions: Key barriers were analyzed using the consolidated framework for advancing implementation science to interpret results and identify strategies for enhancing the implementation of SDM in a virtual setting. The CFIR-ERIC tool highlighted the need for targeted educational meetings and materials to address the training and educational needs of both clinicians and patients for future iterations of this intervention.

临床医生和患者共同决策促进慢性中风患者日常手臂使用的经验:一项探索性定性研究。
目的:探讨临床医生和慢性中风患者在上肢康复过程中使用共同决策(SDM)改善家庭环境中日常手臂使用的态度和经验。具体而言,我们旨在描述临床医生和患者对在针对社区慢性中风患者的自主上肢干预中使用 SDM 的促进因素和障碍的看法:方法: 在一项检查 "使用我的手臂-远程 "干预措施可行性的干预研究中收集数据。对提供干预的临床医生(3 人)进行了焦点小组访谈,并对研究参与者(15 人)进行了个人半结构化访谈。所有访谈数据均在干预期结束后收集。数据采用主题分析法进行分析:确定了以下主题(1) 平等的伙伴关系;(2) 增强临床医生的信心;(3) 这是不同的。每个主题中都确定了促进因素和障碍。临床医生的主要促进因素是 SDM 的能力和患者的特点;而患者的促进因素则是与临床医生之间开放和信任的关系以及个性化的体验。对临床医生而言,SDM 的主要障碍是缺乏 SDM 的专业知识和参与者的认同;而患者则认为缺乏卒中康复的基础知识是一个潜在的障碍:结论:利用推进实施科学的综合框架对关键障碍进行了分析,以解释结果并确定在虚拟环境中加强 SDM 实施的策略。CFIR-ERIC工具强调了有针对性的教育会议和材料的必要性,以满足临床医生和患者在未来迭代该干预措施时的培训和教育需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信