Identification of the genetic background of laboratory rats through amplicon-based next-generation sequencing for single-nucleotide polymorphism genotyping.

IF 1.9 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Meng Lu, Kai Li, Yuxun Zhou, Junhua Xiao
{"title":"Identification of the genetic background of laboratory rats through amplicon-based next-generation sequencing for single-nucleotide polymorphism genotyping.","authors":"Meng Lu, Kai Li, Yuxun Zhou, Junhua Xiao","doi":"10.1186/s12863-024-01267-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laboratory rats, as model animals, have been extensively used in the fields of life science and medicine. It is crucial to routinely monitor the genetic background of laboratory rats. The conventional approach relies on gel electrophoresis and capillary electrophoresis (CE) technologies. However, the experimental and data analysis procedures for both of these methods are time consuming and costly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We established a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) typing scheme using multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) to address the genetic background ambiguity in laboratory rats. This methodology involved three rounds of PCR and two rounds of magnetic bead selection to improve the quality of the sequencing data. We simultaneously analysed 100 laboratory rats (including rats of 5 inbred strains and 2 in-house closed colonies), and the sequencing depth varied from an average of 108.25 to 5189.89, with sample uniformity ranging from 82.5 to 97.5%. A total of 98.9% of the amplicons were successfully genotyped (≥ 30 reads). Genetic background analysis revealed that all 38 experimental rats from the 5 inbred strains were successfully identified (without a heterozygous allele). For the 2 in-house closed colonies, the average heterozygosity (0.162 and 0.169) deviated from the typical range of 0.5-0.7, indicating a departure from the ideal heterozygosity level. Additionally, we employed multiplex PCR-CE to validate the NGS-based method, which yielded consistent results for all the rat strains. These results demonstrated that this approach significantly improves efficiency, saves time, reduces costs and ensures accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By utilizing NGS technology, our developed method leverages SNP genotyping for genetic background identification in laboratory rats, demonstrating advantages in terms of labour efficiency and cost-effectiveness, thereby rendering it well suited for projects involving extensive sample cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":72427,"journal":{"name":"BMC genomic data","volume":"25 1","pages":"84"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11451121/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC genomic data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-024-01267-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laboratory rats, as model animals, have been extensively used in the fields of life science and medicine. It is crucial to routinely monitor the genetic background of laboratory rats. The conventional approach relies on gel electrophoresis and capillary electrophoresis (CE) technologies. However, the experimental and data analysis procedures for both of these methods are time consuming and costly.

Results: We established a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) typing scheme using multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) to address the genetic background ambiguity in laboratory rats. This methodology involved three rounds of PCR and two rounds of magnetic bead selection to improve the quality of the sequencing data. We simultaneously analysed 100 laboratory rats (including rats of 5 inbred strains and 2 in-house closed colonies), and the sequencing depth varied from an average of 108.25 to 5189.89, with sample uniformity ranging from 82.5 to 97.5%. A total of 98.9% of the amplicons were successfully genotyped (≥ 30 reads). Genetic background analysis revealed that all 38 experimental rats from the 5 inbred strains were successfully identified (without a heterozygous allele). For the 2 in-house closed colonies, the average heterozygosity (0.162 and 0.169) deviated from the typical range of 0.5-0.7, indicating a departure from the ideal heterozygosity level. Additionally, we employed multiplex PCR-CE to validate the NGS-based method, which yielded consistent results for all the rat strains. These results demonstrated that this approach significantly improves efficiency, saves time, reduces costs and ensures accuracy.

Conclusion: By utilizing NGS technology, our developed method leverages SNP genotyping for genetic background identification in laboratory rats, demonstrating advantages in terms of labour efficiency and cost-effectiveness, thereby rendering it well suited for projects involving extensive sample cohorts.

通过基于扩增子的下一代测序进行单核苷酸多态性基因分型,鉴定实验鼠的遗传背景。
背景:实验鼠作为模式动物已被广泛应用于生命科学和医学领域。对实验鼠的遗传背景进行常规监测至关重要。传统方法依赖于凝胶电泳和毛细管电泳(CE)技术。然而,这两种方法的实验和数据分析过程都耗时费钱:我们利用多重聚合酶链式反应(PCR)和下一代测序(NGS)建立了单核苷酸多态性(SNP)分型方案,以解决实验鼠遗传背景不明确的问题。该方法包括三轮 PCR 和两轮磁珠筛选,以提高测序数据的质量。我们同时分析了100只实验鼠(包括5个近交系和2个内部封闭群),测序深度从平均108.25到5189.89不等,样本均匀度从82.5%到97.5%不等。共有 98.9% 的扩增子成功进行了基因分型(≥ 30 个读数)。遗传背景分析显示,来自 5 个近交系的 38 只实验鼠都被成功鉴定(没有杂合等位基因)。在 2 个内部封闭群中,平均杂合度(0.162 和 0.169)偏离了 0.5-0.7 的典型范围,表明偏离了理想的杂合度水平。此外,我们还采用了多重 PCR-CE 来验证基于 NGS 的方法,该方法在所有大鼠品系中都得到了一致的结果。这些结果表明,这种方法大大提高了效率、节省了时间、降低了成本并确保了准确性:结论:通过利用 NGS 技术,我们开发的方法利用 SNP 基因分型鉴定实验鼠的遗传背景,在劳动效率和成本效益方面表现出优势,因此非常适合涉及大量样本群的项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信