Assessing the frontline competency gap: Emergency care perceptions among nurses in Yemen's conflict zone.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Zakaria Ahmed Mani, Adnan Innab, Fuad Taleb
{"title":"Assessing the frontline competency gap: Emergency care perceptions among nurses in Yemen's conflict zone.","authors":"Zakaria Ahmed Mani, Adnan Innab, Fuad Taleb","doi":"10.1111/inr.13047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nursing competencies in armed conflict situations are critical for effective response and recovery. This study explores nurses' perceptions regarding their competencies in armed conflict zones to identify areas of proficiency and those requiring further emphasis in training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional descriptive study adhered to the STROBE reporting guidelines. It used a validated questionnaire examining 47 different competencies for nursing in armed conflict zones, which were subsequently ranked to identify those that were valued most and least.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 102 questionnaires were returned (85% response rate). The highest-ranked competencies focused on immediate life-saving interventions and personal safety. In contrast, competencies involving broader disaster management, such as understanding organizational disaster plans, post-death care, and risk identification, ranked lower. This observation may indicate a tendency to prioritize direct clinical care over strategic planning and long-term recovery in disaster nursing education.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and implications for nursing and health policy: </strong>This study highlights the critical need to strengthen emergency care competencies among nurses working in armed conflict zones in Yemen. Its findings underscore the importance of targeted training programs, particularly in complex trauma management and psychological first aid, to address nurses' self-identified competency gaps. Policy implications include prioritizing resource allocation for emergency care infrastructure, implementing competency-based deployment strategies, and ensuring access to mental health support for nurses in working conflict zones. These actions are essential for building a resilient nursing workforce capable of providing quality care amidst the unique challenges of armed conflict.</p>","PeriodicalId":54931,"journal":{"name":"International Nursing Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Nursing Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.13047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nursing competencies in armed conflict situations are critical for effective response and recovery. This study explores nurses' perceptions regarding their competencies in armed conflict zones to identify areas of proficiency and those requiring further emphasis in training.

Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study adhered to the STROBE reporting guidelines. It used a validated questionnaire examining 47 different competencies for nursing in armed conflict zones, which were subsequently ranked to identify those that were valued most and least.

Results: In total, 102 questionnaires were returned (85% response rate). The highest-ranked competencies focused on immediate life-saving interventions and personal safety. In contrast, competencies involving broader disaster management, such as understanding organizational disaster plans, post-death care, and risk identification, ranked lower. This observation may indicate a tendency to prioritize direct clinical care over strategic planning and long-term recovery in disaster nursing education.

Conclusion and implications for nursing and health policy: This study highlights the critical need to strengthen emergency care competencies among nurses working in armed conflict zones in Yemen. Its findings underscore the importance of targeted training programs, particularly in complex trauma management and psychological first aid, to address nurses' self-identified competency gaps. Policy implications include prioritizing resource allocation for emergency care infrastructure, implementing competency-based deployment strategies, and ensuring access to mental health support for nurses in working conflict zones. These actions are essential for building a resilient nursing workforce capable of providing quality care amidst the unique challenges of armed conflict.

评估一线能力差距:也门冲突地区护士对紧急护理的看法。
背景:武装冲突情况下的护理能力对于有效应对和恢复至关重要。本研究探讨了护士对其在武装冲突地区的能力的看法,以确定护士在哪些方面具备能力,哪些方面需要在培训中进一步强调:这项横断面描述性研究遵循了 STROBE 报告指南。方法:这项横断面描述性研究遵循了 STROBE 报告指南,使用了一份经过验证的调查问卷,调查了武装冲突地区护理人员的 47 种不同能力,随后对这些能力进行了排序,以确定哪些能力最受重视,哪些能力最不受重 视:结果:共收回 102 份问卷(回收率为 85%)。排名最高的能力主要集中在即时救生干预和人身安全方面。相比之下,涉及更广泛灾害管理的能力,如了解组织灾害计划、死亡后护理和风险识别等,排名靠后。这一观察结果可能表明,在灾难护理教育中,人们倾向于优先考虑直接临床护理,而不是战略规划和长期恢复:本研究强调了加强在也门武装冲突地区工作的护士应急护理能力的迫切需要。研究结果强调了有针对性的培训计划的重要性,尤其是在复杂创伤管理和心理急救方面,以解决护士自我认定的能力差距。研究对政策的影响包括优先为紧急护理基础设施分配资源,实施基于能力的部署战略,以及确保冲突地区工作的护士能够获得心理健康支持。这些行动对于建设一支能够在武装冲突的独特挑战中提供优质护理的弹性护理队伍至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Nursing Review is a key resource for nurses world-wide. Articles are encouraged that reflect the ICN"s five key values: flexibility, inclusiveness, partnership, achievement and visionary leadership. Authors are encouraged to identify the relevance of local issues for the global community and to describe their work and to document their experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信