Coaching Pediatricians for Wellbeing: A Pilot Feasibility and Acceptability Study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Suzanne Kennedy, Suzie Carmack, Lang Li, Feng-Chang Lin, Joseph E Hatch, Kathrine Chan, Sue Tolleson-Rinehart, Terry L Noah
{"title":"Coaching Pediatricians for Wellbeing: A Pilot Feasibility and Acceptability Study.","authors":"Suzanne Kennedy, Suzie Carmack, Lang Li, Feng-Chang Lin, Joseph E Hatch, Kathrine Chan, Sue Tolleson-Rinehart, Terry L Noah","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2024.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Organization-sponsored interventions have the potential to promote, and destigmatize seeking help for, wellbeing. Our study objective was to explore the acceptability and feasibility of a coaching intervention to improve wellbeing among faculty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a pilot, pre/post design, study in a convenience sample of pediatric faculty at an academic medical center. Participants were offered ≤6 live virtual coaching sessions at the participant's discretion. In addition, a novel wellbeing individual development plan (WB-IDP) was distributed to participants. Primary outcomes were feasibility of the intervention, defined as completing ≥1 coaching session and acceptability measured by anonymous feedback and use of the WB-IDP. Secondary outcomes were wellbeing (WHO Wellbeing Index (WHO-5)), stress (Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)), and work engagement (Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES)), at baseline, 3, and 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All enrollees (N = 28) completed at least one, 18/28 (64%) completed at least four, and 9/28 (32%) completed six coaching sessions. Of 28 participants, 11 (39%) started a WB-IDP and 5/28 (18%) completed and implemented the plan. The aggregate WHO-5 score showed a statistically significant change from baseline (53.3) to month 6 (64.3) (P < .01). Fourteen 14/27 (52%) participants had an improvement of ≥10 points in WHO-5 score between baseline and month 6. No other significant changes were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individualized certified coaching for wellbeing was successfully implemented and associated with a significant increase in wellbeing. We speculate that wellbeing coaching can be promoted by faculty development programs in university and health care settings and has potential to improve organizational outcomes.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>Pediatrician Wellbeing Program, NCT04805294, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04805294?term=pediatrician&cond=wellbeing&cntry=US&state=US%3ANC&draw=2&rank=1.</p>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"102586"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2024.09.010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Organization-sponsored interventions have the potential to promote, and destigmatize seeking help for, wellbeing. Our study objective was to explore the acceptability and feasibility of a coaching intervention to improve wellbeing among faculty.

Methods: We conducted a pilot, pre/post design, study in a convenience sample of pediatric faculty at an academic medical center. Participants were offered ≤6 live virtual coaching sessions at the participant's discretion. In addition, a novel wellbeing individual development plan (WB-IDP) was distributed to participants. Primary outcomes were feasibility of the intervention, defined as completing ≥1 coaching session and acceptability measured by anonymous feedback and use of the WB-IDP. Secondary outcomes were wellbeing (WHO Wellbeing Index (WHO-5)), stress (Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)), and work engagement (Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES)), at baseline, 3, and 6 months.

Results: All enrollees (N = 28) completed at least one, 18/28 (64%) completed at least four, and 9/28 (32%) completed six coaching sessions. Of 28 participants, 11 (39%) started a WB-IDP and 5/28 (18%) completed and implemented the plan. The aggregate WHO-5 score showed a statistically significant change from baseline (53.3) to month 6 (64.3) (P < .01). Fourteen 14/27 (52%) participants had an improvement of ≥10 points in WHO-5 score between baseline and month 6. No other significant changes were observed.

Conclusions: Individualized certified coaching for wellbeing was successfully implemented and associated with a significant increase in wellbeing. We speculate that wellbeing coaching can be promoted by faculty development programs in university and health care settings and has potential to improve organizational outcomes.

Clinical trial registration: Pediatrician Wellbeing Program, NCT04805294, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04805294?term=pediatrician&cond=wellbeing&cntry=US&state=US%3ANC&draw=2&rank=1.

儿科医生幸福辅导:可行性和可接受性试点研究。
目的:组织赞助的干预措施有可能促进健康,并消除寻求帮助的耻辱感。我们的研究目标是探索一种旨在改善教职员工幸福感的辅导干预措施的可接受性和可行性:我们在一家学术医疗中心的儿科教师中进行了一项前/后设计的试点研究。我们为参与者提供了一次辅导课,并通过匿名反馈和使用 WB-IDP 来衡量其接受度。次要结果为基线、3 个月和 6 个月时的幸福感(WHO 幸福指数 (WHO-5))、压力(感知压力量表 (PSS))和工作参与度(乌特勒支工作参与度量表 (UWES)):所有参加者(28 人)至少完成了一次辅导,18/28(64%)至少完成了 4 次,9/28(32%)完成了 6 次。在 28 名参与者中,有 11 人(39%)开始实施 WB-IDP 计划,5/28(18%)完成并实施了该计划。从基线(53.3 分)到第 6 个月(64.3 分),WHO-5 总分出现了统计学意义上的显著变化(P 结论:从基线到第 6 个月(64.3 分),WHO-5 总分出现了统计学意义上的显著变化:经认证的个性化健康辅导已成功实施,并与健康水平的显著提高相关联。我们推测,大学和医疗机构的教师发展计划可以推广幸福感辅导,并有可能改善组织成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Pediatrics
Academic Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信