Use of a Liaison-Mediated Referral Strategy and Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Alexandra I Mansour, Milan Seth, Michael P Thompson, Mary Casey, Steven J Keteyian, Frank A Smith, Hitinder S Gurm, Devraj Sukul
{"title":"Use of a Liaison-Mediated Referral Strategy and Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.","authors":"Alexandra I Mansour, Milan Seth, Michael P Thompson, Mary Casey, Steven J Keteyian, Frank A Smith, Hitinder S Gurm, Devraj Sukul","doi":"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.010874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) but remains underutilized. A liaison-mediated referral (LMR), where a health care professional explains CR's benefits, addresses barriers to participation, and places a referral before discharge, may promote CR use. Our objective was to assess the impact of an LMR on CR participation after PCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent PCI across 48 hospitals in Michigan between January 2021 and April 2022 and referred to CR before discharge. Clinical registry data were linked to administrative claims to identify the primary outcome, CR participation, defined as ≥1 CR session within 90 days of discharge. Bayesian hierarchical logistic regression was used to compare CR participation between patients with and without an LMR. For the secondary outcome, frailty proportional hazard modeling compared days elapsed between discharge and first CR session between liaison cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 9023 patients referred to CR after PCI, 4323 (47.9%) underwent an LMR (mean age, 69.3 [SD=11] years; 68.3% male) and 3390 (36.7%) attended ≥1 CR session within 90 days of discharge. The LMR cohort had a higher unadjusted CR participation rate (43.1% [95% CI, 41.5%-44.6%] versus 32.4% [95% CI, 31.1%-33.8%]; <i>P</i><0.001), a higher adjusted odds ratio of attending ≥1 CR session (adjusted odds ratio, 1.21; 95% credible interval, 1.07-1.38), and a shorter delay in attending the first CR session compared with the non-LMR cohort (28 [interquartile range, 19-42] versus 33 [interquartile range, 21-47] days; <i>P</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An LMR was associated with higher odds of CR participation and may mitigate delays in CR enrollment. This referral strategy may improve CR participation and patient outcomes after PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":49221,"journal":{"name":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.010874","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) but remains underutilized. A liaison-mediated referral (LMR), where a health care professional explains CR's benefits, addresses barriers to participation, and places a referral before discharge, may promote CR use. Our objective was to assess the impact of an LMR on CR participation after PCI.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent PCI across 48 hospitals in Michigan between January 2021 and April 2022 and referred to CR before discharge. Clinical registry data were linked to administrative claims to identify the primary outcome, CR participation, defined as ≥1 CR session within 90 days of discharge. Bayesian hierarchical logistic regression was used to compare CR participation between patients with and without an LMR. For the secondary outcome, frailty proportional hazard modeling compared days elapsed between discharge and first CR session between liaison cohorts.

Results: Among 9023 patients referred to CR after PCI, 4323 (47.9%) underwent an LMR (mean age, 69.3 [SD=11] years; 68.3% male) and 3390 (36.7%) attended ≥1 CR session within 90 days of discharge. The LMR cohort had a higher unadjusted CR participation rate (43.1% [95% CI, 41.5%-44.6%] versus 32.4% [95% CI, 31.1%-33.8%]; P<0.001), a higher adjusted odds ratio of attending ≥1 CR session (adjusted odds ratio, 1.21; 95% credible interval, 1.07-1.38), and a shorter delay in attending the first CR session compared with the non-LMR cohort (28 [interquartile range, 19-42] versus 33 [interquartile range, 21-47] days; P<0.001).

Conclusions: An LMR was associated with higher odds of CR participation and may mitigate delays in CR enrollment. This referral strategy may improve CR participation and patient outcomes after PCI.

经皮冠状动脉介入术后转诊策略的使用和心脏康复的参与情况。
背景:心脏康复(CR)可改善经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的预后,但仍未得到充分利用。联络员中介转介(LMR),即医护人员解释心脏康复的益处、解决参与障碍并在出院前进行转介,可促进心脏康复的使用。我们的目的是评估 LMR 对 PCI 后 CR 参与的影响:这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象是 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 4 月期间在密歇根州 48 家医院接受 PCI 治疗并在出院前转诊至 CR 的患者。临床登记数据与行政报销单相链接,以确定主要结果,即 CR 参与度,定义为出院后 90 天内≥1 次 CR 治疗。贝叶斯分层逻辑回归用于比较有 LMR 和没有 LMR 患者的 CR 参与情况。对于次要结果,采用虚弱比例危险模型比较了不同联络队列之间从出院到首次 CR 治疗的间隔天数:在 9023 名 PCI 后转诊至 CR 的患者中,4323 人(47.9%)接受了 LMR(平均年龄 69.3 [SD=11] 岁;68.3% 为男性),3390 人(36.7%)在出院后 90 天内参加了≥1 次 CR 治疗。LMR队列的未调整CR参与率更高(43.1% [95% CI, 41.5%-44.6%] 对 32.4% [95% CI, 31.1%-33.8%]; PPConclusions:LMR 与更高的 CR 参与率相关,并可缓解 CR 注册的延迟。这种转诊策略可提高 CR 参与率,改善 PCI 后患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, an American Heart Association journal, publishes articles related to improving cardiovascular health and health care. Content includes original research, reviews, and case studies relevant to clinical decision-making and healthcare policy. The online-only journal is dedicated to furthering the mission of promoting safe, effective, efficient, equitable, timely, and patient-centered care. Through its articles and contributions, the journal equips you with the knowledge you need to improve clinical care and population health, and allows you to engage in scholarly activities of consequence to the health of the public. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes considers the following types of articles: Original Research Articles, Data Reports, Methods Papers, Cardiovascular Perspectives, Care Innovations, Novel Statistical Methods, Policy Briefs, Data Visualizations, and Caregiver or Patient Viewpoints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信