The Impact of Preangiography Anxiety on Postangiography Comfort in Older Adults: Implications for Perianesthesia Nursing Care.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
İlayda Sarac, Seçil Taylan, Fatma Eti Aslan
{"title":"The Impact of Preangiography Anxiety on Postangiography Comfort in Older Adults: Implications for Perianesthesia Nursing Care.","authors":"İlayda Sarac, Seçil Taylan, Fatma Eti Aslan","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.05.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the relationship between anxiety before coronary angiography and comfort after coronary angiography in people over 65 years of age.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A descriptive cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study population consisted of patients aged 65 years and older who agreed to participate in the study and underwent coronary angiography. The study was carried out on a total of 201 patients. Data for the study were collected using the Sociodemographic and Medical Information Form, Surgical Fear Questionnaire (SFQ), Early Postoperative Comfort Scale, Visual Anxiety Scale (VAS), and Angiography Information Form. Pearson's test was used to determine the direction of the relationship between comfort after angiography and fear and anxiety before angiography. Multivariate linear regression program was used for different orders of magnitude between predictors of comfort rates.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A negative and low-level correlation was found between Early Postoperative Comfort Scale and short-term SFQ, long-term SFQ, total SFQ, and VAS. Variables and scale scores that showed statistically significant differences in predicting patient comfort after angiography in univariate analyses were evaluated using stepwise multiple linear regression analysis. The best model for the postangiography comfort score was created in step 4. Increasing age, the presence of a chronic disease, and high levels of anxiety and fear before angiography were found to be negative predictors of comfort after angiography.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Comfort after angiography was reduced by high fear and anxiety before angiography, increasing age, and the presence of chronic disease. This study highlights the importance of anxiety management and individualized care before angiography in older people.</p>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2024.05.028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the relationship between anxiety before coronary angiography and comfort after coronary angiography in people over 65 years of age.

Design: A descriptive cross-sectional study.

Methods: The study population consisted of patients aged 65 years and older who agreed to participate in the study and underwent coronary angiography. The study was carried out on a total of 201 patients. Data for the study were collected using the Sociodemographic and Medical Information Form, Surgical Fear Questionnaire (SFQ), Early Postoperative Comfort Scale, Visual Anxiety Scale (VAS), and Angiography Information Form. Pearson's test was used to determine the direction of the relationship between comfort after angiography and fear and anxiety before angiography. Multivariate linear regression program was used for different orders of magnitude between predictors of comfort rates.

Findings: A negative and low-level correlation was found between Early Postoperative Comfort Scale and short-term SFQ, long-term SFQ, total SFQ, and VAS. Variables and scale scores that showed statistically significant differences in predicting patient comfort after angiography in univariate analyses were evaluated using stepwise multiple linear regression analysis. The best model for the postangiography comfort score was created in step 4. Increasing age, the presence of a chronic disease, and high levels of anxiety and fear before angiography were found to be negative predictors of comfort after angiography.

Conclusions: Comfort after angiography was reduced by high fear and anxiety before angiography, increasing age, and the presence of chronic disease. This study highlights the importance of anxiety management and individualized care before angiography in older people.

血管造影前焦虑对老年人血管造影后舒适度的影响:对围术期护理的影响。
目的:确定 65 岁以上老年人冠状动脉造影术前的焦虑与冠状动脉造影术后的舒适度之间的关系:方法:描述性横断面研究:研究对象包括同意参与研究并接受冠状动脉造影术的 65 岁及以上患者。研究共针对 201 名患者进行。研究数据通过社会人口学和医疗信息表、手术恐惧问卷(SFQ)、术后早期舒适度量表、视觉焦虑量表(VAS)和血管造影信息表收集。皮尔逊检验用于确定血管造影术后舒适度与血管造影术前恐惧和焦虑之间的关系。使用多变量线性回归程序对舒适度预测因素之间的不同数量级进行了分析:结果:术后早期舒适度量表与短期 SFQ、长期 SFQ、SFQ 总分和 VAS 之间存在低度负相关。采用逐步多元线性回归分析法评估了在单变量分析中预测血管造影术后患者舒适度的变量和量表评分,结果显示这些变量和量表评分在统计学上有显著差异。血管造影术后舒适度评分的最佳模型在步骤 4 中建立。研究发现,年龄的增加、慢性疾病的存在以及血管造影术前的高度焦虑和恐惧是血管造影术后舒适度的负面预测因素:结论:血管造影术前的高度恐惧和焦虑、年龄的增加和慢性疾病的存在会降低血管造影术后的舒适度。本研究强调了老年人在血管造影术前进行焦虑管理和个性化护理的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
17.60%
发文量
279
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing provides original, peer-reviewed research for a primary audience that includes nurses in perianesthesia settings, including ambulatory surgery, preadmission testing, postanesthesia care (Phases I and II), extended observation, and pain management. The Journal provides a forum for sharing professional knowledge and experience relating to management, ethics, legislation, research, and other aspects of perianesthesia nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信