Frailty; Time for Global Action : Commentary on "Frailty and its Association with Long-Term Mortality among Community-Dwelling older adults aged 75 years and Over".
{"title":"Frailty; Time for Global Action : Commentary on \"Frailty and its Association with Long-Term Mortality among Community-Dwelling older adults aged 75 years and Over\".","authors":"Yotam Weiss, Idit Matot","doi":"10.1186/s13584-024-00646-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This commentary examines the study \"Frailty and Its Association with Long-Term Mortality Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults Aged 75 Years and Over\" by Lewis et al. The retrospective cohort study utilized data from a primary healthcare provider in Israel to investigate frailty using the Frailty Index (FI) and its correlation with long-term mortality. Nearly half of the older adult cohort was identified as frail, with a strong association between higher frailty levels and increased mortality risk. The commentary emphasizes the importance of routine frailty screening in clinical practice and health policy. Integrating FI calculations into electronic health records can facilitate timely care for high-risk individuals. However, presenting frailty data must be managed carefully and in conjunction with patients' preferences to avoid stigmatizing and negatively influencing clinical decisions. While the FI is a valuable tool, it should complement, not replace, other assessments that provide a more holistic view of the patient's health. Furthermore, the commentary strongly advocates for a more comprehensive approach to patient care, emphasizing that non-geriatricians must also be proficient in recognizing and managing frailty. Effectively addressing frailty can lead to significant cost savings for healthcare systems, reduced burden on healthcare facilities, and decreased need for long-term care.</p>","PeriodicalId":46694,"journal":{"name":"Israel Journal of Health Policy Research","volume":"13 1","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11451099/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Journal of Health Policy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-024-00646-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This commentary examines the study "Frailty and Its Association with Long-Term Mortality Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults Aged 75 Years and Over" by Lewis et al. The retrospective cohort study utilized data from a primary healthcare provider in Israel to investigate frailty using the Frailty Index (FI) and its correlation with long-term mortality. Nearly half of the older adult cohort was identified as frail, with a strong association between higher frailty levels and increased mortality risk. The commentary emphasizes the importance of routine frailty screening in clinical practice and health policy. Integrating FI calculations into electronic health records can facilitate timely care for high-risk individuals. However, presenting frailty data must be managed carefully and in conjunction with patients' preferences to avoid stigmatizing and negatively influencing clinical decisions. While the FI is a valuable tool, it should complement, not replace, other assessments that provide a more holistic view of the patient's health. Furthermore, the commentary strongly advocates for a more comprehensive approach to patient care, emphasizing that non-geriatricians must also be proficient in recognizing and managing frailty. Effectively addressing frailty can lead to significant cost savings for healthcare systems, reduced burden on healthcare facilities, and decreased need for long-term care.