Correlation between CT volumetry and actual graft weight in living donor liver transplants in South Africa.

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
SA Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2024-09-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajr.v28i1.2917
Katherine D Calver, Owen Terreblanche, Ilonka Warnich, Francisca van der Schyff
{"title":"Correlation between CT volumetry and actual graft weight in living donor liver transplants in South Africa.","authors":"Katherine D Calver, Owen Terreblanche, Ilonka Warnich, Francisca van der Schyff","doi":"10.4102/sajr.v28i1.2917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liver transplantation is the definitive management for patients with end-stage liver disease. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) is used in living donor liver transplant (LDLT) for donor and graft selection as well as predicting graft weight.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to establish the relationship between estimated graft volume (EGV) and actual graft weight (AGW) and ascertain a correlation coefficient that will improve the accuracy of EGV in a South African population.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study included 117 LDLT between March 2013 and August 2022. Of these, 86 were left lateral (LL), 15 right lobe (R), 10 left lobe with caudate (LC), five left lobe (L) and one segment two (monosegment) grafts. Estimated graft volume and actual graft weight were compared using the Pearson coefficient and the relationship was illustrated with scatter plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Estimated graft volume and AGW had a strong positive correlation with a Pearson correlation (R) of 0.95 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The relationship was significantly linear with a correlation coefficient of 0.71. The mean EGV was significantly higher than that of AGW (388 mL ± 249 mL vs. 353 g ± 184 g) with overestimation in 61% of cases. Left lateral and R grafts were the most prevalent LDLT graft type, both having a strong linear correlation between EGV and AGW.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Applying a correlation coefficient of 0.71 will improve the accuracy of CT volumetry graft weight predictions.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>A unique correlation coefficient will improve EGV accuracy, aiding in preoperative planning and mitigating post-operative complications in both donors and recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":43442,"journal":{"name":"SA Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11447610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v28i1.2917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Liver transplantation is the definitive management for patients with end-stage liver disease. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) is used in living donor liver transplant (LDLT) for donor and graft selection as well as predicting graft weight.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to establish the relationship between estimated graft volume (EGV) and actual graft weight (AGW) and ascertain a correlation coefficient that will improve the accuracy of EGV in a South African population.

Method: The study included 117 LDLT between March 2013 and August 2022. Of these, 86 were left lateral (LL), 15 right lobe (R), 10 left lobe with caudate (LC), five left lobe (L) and one segment two (monosegment) grafts. Estimated graft volume and actual graft weight were compared using the Pearson coefficient and the relationship was illustrated with scatter plots.

Results: Estimated graft volume and AGW had a strong positive correlation with a Pearson correlation (R) of 0.95 (p < 0.001). The relationship was significantly linear with a correlation coefficient of 0.71. The mean EGV was significantly higher than that of AGW (388 mL ± 249 mL vs. 353 g ± 184 g) with overestimation in 61% of cases. Left lateral and R grafts were the most prevalent LDLT graft type, both having a strong linear correlation between EGV and AGW.

Conclusion: Applying a correlation coefficient of 0.71 will improve the accuracy of CT volumetry graft weight predictions.

Contribution: A unique correlation coefficient will improve EGV accuracy, aiding in preoperative planning and mitigating post-operative complications in both donors and recipients.

南非活体肝移植中 CT 容量测量与实际移植物重量之间的相关性。
背景:肝移植是终末期肝病患者的最终治疗方法。活体肝移植(LDLT)术前计算机断层扫描(CT)用于供体和移植物的选择以及移植物重量的预测:本研究旨在确定估计移植物体积(EGV)和实际移植物重量(AGW)之间的关系,并确定一个相关系数,以提高南非人群中 EGV 的准确性:研究包括 2013 年 3 月至 2022 年 8 月间的 117 例 LDLT。其中,86 例为左侧叶 (LL)、15 例为右叶 (R)、10 例为带尾状突起的左叶 (LC)、5 例为左叶 (L) 和 1 例为二段(单段)移植物。使用皮尔逊系数对估计移植物体积和实际移植物重量进行比较,并用散点图说明两者之间的关系:结果:估计移植物体积和 AGW 具有很强的正相关性,皮尔逊相关系数 (R) 为 0.95(p < 0.001)。两者呈明显的线性关系,相关系数为 0.71。平均 EGV 明显高于 AGW(388 mL ± 249 mL vs. 353 g ± 184 g),61% 的病例高估了 EGV。左外侧移植物和R移植物是最常见的LDLT移植物类型,两者的EGV和AGW之间有很强的线性相关:结论:采用 0.71 的相关系数可提高 CT 容积测量法预测移植物重量的准确性:贡献:独特的相关系数将提高EGV的准确性,有助于术前规划,并减少供体和受体的术后并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SA Journal of Radiology
SA Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The SA Journal of Radiology is the official journal of the Radiological Society of South Africa and the Professional Association of Radiologists in South Africa and Namibia. The SA Journal of Radiology is a general diagnostic radiological journal which carries original research and review articles, pictorial essays, case reports, letters, editorials, radiological practice and other radiological articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信