Impact of osteopathic manipulative medicine training during graduate medical education and its integration into clinical practice.

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-07 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1515/jom-2024-0082
Joanna L Kramer, Kirby Trombetti, Kathleen De Asis, Vivian Mai, Edward Swing
{"title":"Impact of osteopathic manipulative medicine training during graduate medical education and its integration into clinical practice.","authors":"Joanna L Kramer, Kirby Trombetti, Kathleen De Asis, Vivian Mai, Edward Swing","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) is a unique skill set consisting of physical manipulations that treat the neuromusculoskeletal system. Although OMM can improve patient outcomes such as functionality and pain, as well as increase physician reimbursement, its use is declining. Barriers to its use include a lack of proficiency, support, reimbursement, and time. Knowledge gaps remain as to how OMM training during graduate medical education (GME) affects OMM use.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study describes relationships between OMM exposure during GME and the use of OMM in practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey of physicians in a variety of medical fields during late 2022 assessed the impact of OMM education during postgraduate training on its use in clinical practice. Survey data were analyzed to compare training characteristics and OMM use via chi-square tests and binary logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 299 surveys were completed. Respondents who received formal OMM education during residency were more likely (59.8 %) to utilize OMM in medical practice than those who practiced OMM informally (37.8 %, p<0.001) and those who had no OMM exposure during residency (10.3 %, p<0.001). Respondents who trained with more osteopathic attendings (p<0.001) and co-residents (p=0.012) were also more likely to utilize OMM. Those who completed residencies that were accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) with an Osteopathic recognition track, by the American Osteopathic Association (AOA), and were dually-accredited (ACGME/AOA), were all more likely to utilize OMM (60 %, 56 %, and 53 %, respectively) than those who completed residencies with ACGME accreditation alone (22 %, p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although OMM can improve patient outcomes, it is underutilized by Doctors of Osteopathic Medicine (DOs) in practice. Lack of training after medical school has been identified as a contributing factor to its disuse. The results of our study illustrate that there is a positive association between OMM education during postgraduate training and OMM use in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"143-151"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2024-0082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) is a unique skill set consisting of physical manipulations that treat the neuromusculoskeletal system. Although OMM can improve patient outcomes such as functionality and pain, as well as increase physician reimbursement, its use is declining. Barriers to its use include a lack of proficiency, support, reimbursement, and time. Knowledge gaps remain as to how OMM training during graduate medical education (GME) affects OMM use.

Objectives: This study describes relationships between OMM exposure during GME and the use of OMM in practice.

Methods: An online survey of physicians in a variety of medical fields during late 2022 assessed the impact of OMM education during postgraduate training on its use in clinical practice. Survey data were analyzed to compare training characteristics and OMM use via chi-square tests and binary logistic regression.

Results: A total of 299 surveys were completed. Respondents who received formal OMM education during residency were more likely (59.8 %) to utilize OMM in medical practice than those who practiced OMM informally (37.8 %, p<0.001) and those who had no OMM exposure during residency (10.3 %, p<0.001). Respondents who trained with more osteopathic attendings (p<0.001) and co-residents (p=0.012) were also more likely to utilize OMM. Those who completed residencies that were accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) with an Osteopathic recognition track, by the American Osteopathic Association (AOA), and were dually-accredited (ACGME/AOA), were all more likely to utilize OMM (60 %, 56 %, and 53 %, respectively) than those who completed residencies with ACGME accreditation alone (22 %, p<0.01).

Conclusions: Although OMM can improve patient outcomes, it is underutilized by Doctors of Osteopathic Medicine (DOs) in practice. Lack of training after medical school has been identified as a contributing factor to its disuse. The results of our study illustrate that there is a positive association between OMM education during postgraduate training and OMM use in clinical practice.

医学研究生教育期间的整骨疗法培训的影响及其与临床实践的结合。
背景:整骨疗法(Osteopathic manipulative medicine,OMM)是一种独特的技能,由治疗神经-肌肉-骨骼系统的物理手法组成。尽管整骨疗法可以改善患者的功能和疼痛等疗效,并提高医生的报酬,但其使用率却在下降。其使用障碍包括缺乏熟练程度、支持、报销和时间。关于医学研究生教育(GME)期间的OMM培训如何影响OMM的使用,仍然存在知识空白:本研究描述了在研究生医学教育期间接受 OMM 培训与在实践中使用 OMM 之间的关系:方法: 2022年底,对不同医学领域的医生进行了在线调查,评估研究生培训期间的OMM教育对临床实践中使用OMM的影响。通过卡方检验和二元逻辑回归分析调查数据,比较培训特征和OMM使用情况:共完成了 299 份调查问卷。在住院医师培训期间接受过正规OMM教育的受访者在医疗实践中使用OMM的可能性(59.8%)高于非正式使用OMM的受访者(37.8%,p结论:尽管骨科三坐标测量法可以改善患者的治疗效果,但骨科医生在实践中对其利用不足。医学院毕业后缺乏培训被认为是导致其未被充分利用的一个因素。我们的研究结果表明,研究生培训期间的骨科三坐标测量法教育与骨科三坐标测量法在临床实践中的应用之间存在正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Health Professions-Complementary and Manual Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
118
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信