Low false-positive lymph nodes for 18F-fibroblast activation protein inhibitors PET/computed tomography in preoperative staging of patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Xingyu Mu, Ludeng Lu, Jingze Li, Lei Zhang, Yanyun Deng, Wei Fu
{"title":"Low false-positive lymph nodes for 18F-fibroblast activation protein inhibitors PET/computed tomography in preoperative staging of patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer.","authors":"Xingyu Mu, Ludeng Lu, Jingze Li, Lei Zhang, Yanyun Deng, Wei Fu","doi":"10.1097/MNM.0000000000001913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET/computed tomography (CT) in identifying primary tumors and mediastinal lymph node metastases in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with histopathological findings serving as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nineteen patients underwent preoperative 18F-FAPI PET/CT and subsequent surgery; of these, 13 also underwent 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT within 1 week. The diagnostic accuracy of primary tumors and lymph node metastases was evaluated for both modalities. Semiquantitative parameters, including maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and target-to-background ratios (TBRs), for both primary tumors and lymph node metastases were assessed for both modalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For primary tumors, 18 of 19 (94.7%) showed positive results on 18F-FAPI PET/CT scans. In 13 patients who also underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT, 18F-FAPI PET/CT demonstrated a higher detection rate compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT (100% vs. 69.1%). The overall accuracy of lymph node assessment with 18F-FAPI PET/CT (95.9-97.1%) was significantly higher compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT (51.0%). Malignant lymph nodes exhibited significantly higher SUVmax and TBR on 18F-FAPI scans (SUVmax: 7.0 vs. 0.9, P < 0.001; TBRmuscle: 5.0 vs. 0.8, P < 0.001) than on 18F-FDG scans (SUVmax: 3.9 vs. 1.8, P = 0.01), except for the liver TBR on 18F-FDG scans (TBRliver: 1.8 vs. 1.0, P = 0.055).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>18F-FAPI could be utilized in the preoperative staging of NSCLC to mitigate the incidence of false positives associated with 18F-FDG, due to its higher accuracy in identifying mediastinal lymph node metastasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19708,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001913","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET/computed tomography (CT) in identifying primary tumors and mediastinal lymph node metastases in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with histopathological findings serving as the reference standard.

Methods: Nineteen patients underwent preoperative 18F-FAPI PET/CT and subsequent surgery; of these, 13 also underwent 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT within 1 week. The diagnostic accuracy of primary tumors and lymph node metastases was evaluated for both modalities. Semiquantitative parameters, including maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and target-to-background ratios (TBRs), for both primary tumors and lymph node metastases were assessed for both modalities.

Results: For primary tumors, 18 of 19 (94.7%) showed positive results on 18F-FAPI PET/CT scans. In 13 patients who also underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT, 18F-FAPI PET/CT demonstrated a higher detection rate compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT (100% vs. 69.1%). The overall accuracy of lymph node assessment with 18F-FAPI PET/CT (95.9-97.1%) was significantly higher compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT (51.0%). Malignant lymph nodes exhibited significantly higher SUVmax and TBR on 18F-FAPI scans (SUVmax: 7.0 vs. 0.9, P < 0.001; TBRmuscle: 5.0 vs. 0.8, P < 0.001) than on 18F-FDG scans (SUVmax: 3.9 vs. 1.8, P = 0.01), except for the liver TBR on 18F-FDG scans (TBRliver: 1.8 vs. 1.0, P = 0.055).

Conclusion: 18F-FAPI could be utilized in the preoperative staging of NSCLC to mitigate the incidence of false positives associated with 18F-FDG, due to its higher accuracy in identifying mediastinal lymph node metastasis.

18F-成纤维细胞活化蛋白抑制剂 PET/计算机断层扫描在非小细胞肺癌患者术前分期中的淋巴结低假阳性率。
研究目的本研究旨在评估18F-成纤维细胞活化蛋白抑制剂(FAPI)PET/计算机断层扫描(CT)在确定非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)原发肿瘤和纵隔淋巴结转移方面的诊断准确性,并以组织病理学结果作为参考标准:19名患者在术前接受了18F-FAPI PET/CT检查,随后进行了手术;其中13名患者还在1周内接受了18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)PET/CT检查。评估了两种方式对原发肿瘤和淋巴结转移的诊断准确性。评估了两种方式对原发性肿瘤和淋巴结转移的半定量参数,包括最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)和靶-背景比(TBRs):对于原发肿瘤,19 例患者中有 18 例(94.7%)在 18F-FAPI PET/CT 扫描中显示阳性结果。在同时接受 18F-FDG PET/CT 的 13 例患者中,18F-FAPI PET/CT 的检出率高于 18F-FDG PET/CT(100% 对 69.1%)。与18F-FDG PET/CT(51.0%)相比,18F-FAPI PET/CT淋巴结评估的总体准确率(95.9%-97.1%)明显更高。恶性淋巴结在18F-FAPI扫描中显示出明显更高的SUVmax和TBR(SUVmax:7.0 vs. 0.9,P 结论:18F-FAPI可用于NSCLC的术前分期,以减少与18F-FDG相关的假阳性发生率,因为它在确定纵隔淋巴结转移方面具有更高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
212
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nuclear Medicine Communications, the official journal of the British Nuclear Medicine Society, is a rapid communications journal covering nuclear medicine and molecular imaging with radionuclides, and the basic supporting sciences. As well as clinical research and commentary, manuscripts describing research on preclinical and basic sciences (radiochemistry, radiopharmacy, radiobiology, radiopharmacology, medical physics, computing and engineering, and technical and nursing professions involved in delivering nuclear medicine services) are welcomed, as the journal is intended to be of interest internationally to all members of the many medical and non-medical disciplines involved in nuclear medicine. In addition to papers reporting original studies, frankly written editorials and topical reviews are a regular feature of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信