Clinical implementation and patient-specific quality assurance solutions for real-time target tracking and dynamic delivery in Radixact synchrony.

Abstract

Background: The installation and testing of the first Radixact with Synchrony system in Colombia marked a significant milestone in Latin America's medical landscape. There was a need to devise a robust quality assurance protocol to comprehensively evaluate both dose delivery and motion tracking accuracy. However, testing experiences under clinical conditions have not been extensively reported. Additionally, there are limited recommended measuring devices for Synchrony evaluation.

Purpose: To validate and implement an alternative setup for dynamic-PSQA while testing Synchrony's functionality under clinical scenarios, including real-patient motion traces, and to provide guidance to new centers undergoing clinical implementation of Helical Synchrony.

Methods: This approach involves using the Iba miniPhantomR with strategically placed fiducial markers for configuring Gafchromic-films and array-based setups. When paired with the CIRS Dynamic Platform, this enables an innovative dynamic setup with trackable features for Synchrony delivery testing. Assessment scenarios, including compensation (M1S1) and no-motion compensation (M1S0), were evaluated using 2D-gamma pass rate analysis with multiple clinical gamma criteria. The Synchrony-Simulation feature was used to assess pre-treatment performance and capture the patient's target motion pattern. Synchrony for common clinical cases with patient's motion-traces was validated.

Results: The results for M1S0 and M1S1 demonstrated consistency with previous studies evaluating Synchrony functionality. Analysis using different gamma criteria unveiled dosimetric differences and impacts across various motion ranges. The application of effective kV-dose subtraction for array-based methods is of upmost importance when evaluating dynamic-PSQA with stringent gamma-criteria. However, no significant kV-dose impact on EBT3-Film was detectable.

Conclusion: Two implemented configurations for dynamic-PSQA setups were validated and successfully integrated into our clinic. We addressed both the benefits and limitations of array-based and film-based methods. The functionality and limitations of Synchrony were evaluated using the proposed setups. The potential utility of Synchrony-Simulation, along with the proposed patient-case classification table, can offer valuable support for new users during the clinical implementation of Synchrony treatments.