A Remote Patient Monitoring System with Feedback Mechanisms using a Smartwatch: Concept, Implementation and Evaluation based on the activeDCM Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Reto Wettstein, Farbod Sedaghat-Hamedani, Oliver Heinze, Ali Amr, Christoph Reich, Theresa Betz, Elham Kayvanpour, Angela Merzweiler, Christopher Büsch, Isabell Mohr, Birgit Friedmann-Bette, Norbert Frey, Martin Dugas, Benjamin Meder
{"title":"A Remote Patient Monitoring System with Feedback Mechanisms using a Smartwatch: Concept, Implementation and Evaluation based on the activeDCM Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Reto Wettstein, Farbod Sedaghat-Hamedani, Oliver Heinze, Ali Amr, Christoph Reich, Theresa Betz, Elham Kayvanpour, Angela Merzweiler, Christopher Büsch, Isabell Mohr, Birgit Friedmann-Bette, Norbert Frey, Martin Dugas, Benjamin Meder","doi":"10.2196/58441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Technological advances allow recording and sharing of health-related data in a patient-centric way using smartphones and wearables. Secure sharing of such patient-generated data with physicians would enable a dense management of individual health trajectories, monitoring of risk factors and asynchronous feedback. However, most Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) systems currently available are not fully integrated into hospital IT systems or lack the patient-centric design.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to conceptualize and implement a user-friendly, reusable, interoperable and secure RPM system incorporating asynchronous feedback mechanisms, using a broadly available consumer wearable (Apple Watch). Additionally, the study sought to evaluate factors influencing patient acceptance of such systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The RPM system requirements were established through focus group sessions. Subsequently, a system concept was designed and implemented using an iterative approach, ensuring technical feasibility from the beginning. To assess clinical feasibility, the system was employed as part of the activeDCM prospective, randomized, interventional study focusing on Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM). Each patient used the system for at least 12 months. The System Usability Scale (SUS) was employed to measure usability from a subjective patient perspective. Additionally, an evaluation was conducted on the objective wearable interaction frequency as well as the completeness of transmitted data, classified into Sensor-based Health Data (SHD) and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROM). Descriptive statistics using boxplots, along bootstrapped multiple linear regression with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were utilized for evaluation, analyzing the influence of age, sex, device experience and intervention group membership.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RPM system consists of four interoperable components: patient-devices, data-server, data-viewer and notification-service. The evaluation of the system was conducted with 95 consecutive DCM patients (female: 28 of 95 (29%), age: 50±12 years) completing the activeDCM study protocol. The wearable/ smartphone application of the system achieved a mean SUS score of 78±17, which was most influenced by device experience. 83 of 95 patients (87%) could integrate the wearable application (very) well into their daily routine and 67 of 95 (70%) saw a benefit of the RPM system for management of their health condition. Patients interacted on average with the wearable on 61%±26% of days enrolled in the study, corresponding to 239±99 of 396±39 days. SHD was available on average for 78%±23% of days and PROM data 64%±27% of weeks enrolled in the study, corresponding to 307±87 of 396±39 days and 35±15 of 56±5 weeks, respectively. Wearable interaction frequency, SHD and PROM completeness were most influenced by intervention group membership.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results mark a first step towards integrating RPM systems, based on a consumer wearable device for primary patient input, into standardized clinical workflows. They can serve as a blueprint for creating a user-friendly, reusable, interoperable and secure RPM system, that can be integrated into patients' daily routines.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrial: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov-Identifier: NCT04359238.</p>","PeriodicalId":14756,"journal":{"name":"JMIR mHealth and uHealth","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR mHealth and uHealth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/58441","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Technological advances allow recording and sharing of health-related data in a patient-centric way using smartphones and wearables. Secure sharing of such patient-generated data with physicians would enable a dense management of individual health trajectories, monitoring of risk factors and asynchronous feedback. However, most Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) systems currently available are not fully integrated into hospital IT systems or lack the patient-centric design.

Objective: The objective was to conceptualize and implement a user-friendly, reusable, interoperable and secure RPM system incorporating asynchronous feedback mechanisms, using a broadly available consumer wearable (Apple Watch). Additionally, the study sought to evaluate factors influencing patient acceptance of such systems.

Methods: The RPM system requirements were established through focus group sessions. Subsequently, a system concept was designed and implemented using an iterative approach, ensuring technical feasibility from the beginning. To assess clinical feasibility, the system was employed as part of the activeDCM prospective, randomized, interventional study focusing on Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM). Each patient used the system for at least 12 months. The System Usability Scale (SUS) was employed to measure usability from a subjective patient perspective. Additionally, an evaluation was conducted on the objective wearable interaction frequency as well as the completeness of transmitted data, classified into Sensor-based Health Data (SHD) and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROM). Descriptive statistics using boxplots, along bootstrapped multiple linear regression with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were utilized for evaluation, analyzing the influence of age, sex, device experience and intervention group membership.

Results: The RPM system consists of four interoperable components: patient-devices, data-server, data-viewer and notification-service. The evaluation of the system was conducted with 95 consecutive DCM patients (female: 28 of 95 (29%), age: 50±12 years) completing the activeDCM study protocol. The wearable/ smartphone application of the system achieved a mean SUS score of 78±17, which was most influenced by device experience. 83 of 95 patients (87%) could integrate the wearable application (very) well into their daily routine and 67 of 95 (70%) saw a benefit of the RPM system for management of their health condition. Patients interacted on average with the wearable on 61%±26% of days enrolled in the study, corresponding to 239±99 of 396±39 days. SHD was available on average for 78%±23% of days and PROM data 64%±27% of weeks enrolled in the study, corresponding to 307±87 of 396±39 days and 35±15 of 56±5 weeks, respectively. Wearable interaction frequency, SHD and PROM completeness were most influenced by intervention group membership.

Conclusions: Our results mark a first step towards integrating RPM systems, based on a consumer wearable device for primary patient input, into standardized clinical workflows. They can serve as a blueprint for creating a user-friendly, reusable, interoperable and secure RPM system, that can be integrated into patients' daily routines.

Clinicaltrial: ClinicalTrials.gov-Identifier: NCT04359238.

使用智能手表的带有反馈机制的远程患者监护系统:基于 activeDCM 随机对照试验的概念、实施和评估。
背景:随着技术的进步,人们可以利用智能手机和可穿戴设备,以患者为中心记录和共享与健康相关的数据。与医生安全共享这些由患者生成的数据可实现对个人健康轨迹的密集管理、风险因素监测和异步反馈。然而,目前大多数远程患者监护(RPM)系统都没有完全集成到医院的 IT 系统中,或者缺乏以患者为中心的设计:目的:该研究旨在构思并实施一个用户友好、可重复使用、可互操作且安全的 RPM 系统,该系统结合了异步反馈机制,并使用了一种广泛可用的消费类可穿戴设备(Apple Watch)。此外,该研究还试图评估影响患者接受此类系统的因素:方法:通过焦点小组会议确定了 RPM 系统的要求。随后,采用迭代方法设计并实施了系统概念,从一开始就确保了技术可行性。为了评估临床可行性,该系统作为 activeDCM 前瞻性、随机、介入研究的一部分,主要针对扩张型心肌病 (DCM)。每位患者使用该系统至少 12 个月。系统可用性量表 (SUS) 被用来从患者的主观角度衡量可用性。此外,还对客观的可穿戴设备交互频率以及传输数据的完整性进行了评估,这些数据分为基于传感器的健康数据 (SHD) 和患者报告结果测量 (PROM)。评估中使用了方框图进行描述性统计,并使用带 95% 置信区间 (CI) 的自引导多元线性回归,分析了年龄、性别、设备使用经验和干预小组成员资格的影响:RPM 系统由四个互操作组件组成:患者设备、数据服务器、数据查看器和通知服务。该系统的评估对象是完成 activeDCM 研究方案的 95 名连续 DCM 患者(95 人中有 28 名女性,占 29%,年龄为 50±12 岁)。该系统的可穿戴/智能手机应用的平均 SUS 得分为 78±17,受设备使用经验的影响最大。95 位患者中有 83 位(87%)能将可穿戴应用(非常)很好地融入日常工作,95 位患者中有 67 位(70%)认为 RPM 系统有利于管理他们的健康状况。患者与可穿戴设备进行互动的天数平均为 61%±26%,即 396±39 天中的 239±99。平均有78%±23%的天数可获得SHD数据,有64%±27%的周数可获得PROM数据,分别相当于396±39天中的307±87天和56±5周中的35±15周。可穿戴设备交互频率、SHD和PROM完整性受干预小组成员资格的影响最大:我们的研究结果标志着将基于消费者可穿戴设备的 RPM 系统纳入标准化临床工作流程迈出了第一步。这些结果可作为创建用户友好、可重复使用、可互操作且安全的 RPM 系统的蓝图,该系统可融入患者的日常生活:临床试验:ClinicalTrials.gov-Identifier:NCT04359238。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
JMIR mHealth and uHealth Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
159
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR mHealth and uHealth (JMU, ISSN 2291-5222) is a spin-off journal of JMIR, the leading eHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175). JMIR mHealth and uHealth is indexed in PubMed, PubMed Central, and Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), and in June 2017 received a stunning inaugural Impact Factor of 4.636. The journal focusses on health and biomedical applications in mobile and tablet computing, pervasive and ubiquitous computing, wearable computing and domotics. JMIR mHealth and uHealth publishes since 2013 and was the first mhealth journal in Pubmed. It publishes even faster and has a broader scope with including papers which are more technical or more formative/developmental than what would be published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信