The effectiveness of parenteral agents to mitigate relapses after severe acute migraine headache presentations: A systematic review and network analysis.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Headache Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1111/head.14841
Scott Kirkland, Jillian Meyer, Lloyd Visser, Sandra Campbell, Cristina Villa-Roel, Benjamin W Friedman, Nana Owusu Essel, Brian H Rowe
{"title":"The effectiveness of parenteral agents to mitigate relapses after severe acute migraine headache presentations: A systematic review and network analysis.","authors":"Scott Kirkland, Jillian Meyer, Lloyd Visser, Sandra Campbell, Cristina Villa-Roel, Benjamin W Friedman, Nana Owusu Essel, Brian H Rowe","doi":"10.1111/head.14841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of parenteral agents to reduce relapse in patients with acute migraine and identify factors that predict relapse.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Following discharge from emergency settings, many patients with acute migraine will experience a relapse in pain; severe relapses may result in re-visits to emergency settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search, updated to 2023, was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of parenteral agents on relapse outcomes in patients with acute migraine discharged from emergency settings. Two independent reviewers completed study selection, quality assessment, and data extraction. A traditional meta-analysis compared parenteral corticosteroids to placebo; a frequentist network analysis assessed direct and indirect comparisons. Results are reported as risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (identifier: CRD42018099493).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 8949 citations, a total of 53 unique studies were included involving 6167 patients. Most studies had a high or unclear risk of bias. Corticosteroids significantly reduced relapses compared to placebo (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.52-0.88; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Patients receiving lidocaine (RR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01-0.82), sedatives/hypnotics (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.75), ergot agents (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.25-0.75), neuroleptics (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.31-0.71), opioids (RR 0.58; 95% CI 0.35-0.94), or corticosteroids (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47-0.86) were significantly less likely to relapse. Lidocaine (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-0.71), combination therapy (RR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.74), or adding corticosteroids (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.44-0.84) were more likely to reduce severe relapses. Longer duration of headache and residual pain at discharge were significantly associated with higher relapses.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Corticosteroids remain the recommended first-line option to reduce relapse outcomes. Some parenteral agents typically provided for pain relief including ergot agents, neuroleptics, or combination therapy may effectively reduce relapse; however, opioids are not recommended due to safety concerns. Additional research is needed for some lesser studied, albeit promising, agents including lidocaine and propofol. Effective pain control in emergency settings prior to discharge and duration of headache may play a role in the success of such treatments and further investigations could provide further insight regarding how and why some parenteral agents are effective in mitigating relapse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"1181-1199"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14841","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of parenteral agents to reduce relapse in patients with acute migraine and identify factors that predict relapse.

Background: Following discharge from emergency settings, many patients with acute migraine will experience a relapse in pain; severe relapses may result in re-visits to emergency settings.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search, updated to 2023, was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of parenteral agents on relapse outcomes in patients with acute migraine discharged from emergency settings. Two independent reviewers completed study selection, quality assessment, and data extraction. A traditional meta-analysis compared parenteral corticosteroids to placebo; a frequentist network analysis assessed direct and indirect comparisons. Results are reported as risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (identifier: CRD42018099493).

Results: From 8949 citations, a total of 53 unique studies were included involving 6167 patients. Most studies had a high or unclear risk of bias. Corticosteroids significantly reduced relapses compared to placebo (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.52-0.88; I2 = 0%). Patients receiving lidocaine (RR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01-0.82), sedatives/hypnotics (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.75), ergot agents (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.25-0.75), neuroleptics (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.31-0.71), opioids (RR 0.58; 95% CI 0.35-0.94), or corticosteroids (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47-0.86) were significantly less likely to relapse. Lidocaine (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-0.71), combination therapy (RR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.74), or adding corticosteroids (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.44-0.84) were more likely to reduce severe relapses. Longer duration of headache and residual pain at discharge were significantly associated with higher relapses.

Discussion: Corticosteroids remain the recommended first-line option to reduce relapse outcomes. Some parenteral agents typically provided for pain relief including ergot agents, neuroleptics, or combination therapy may effectively reduce relapse; however, opioids are not recommended due to safety concerns. Additional research is needed for some lesser studied, albeit promising, agents including lidocaine and propofol. Effective pain control in emergency settings prior to discharge and duration of headache may play a role in the success of such treatments and further investigations could provide further insight regarding how and why some parenteral agents are effective in mitigating relapse events.

减轻严重急性偏头痛复发的肠外药剂的有效性:系统综述与网络分析。
目的:比较减少急性偏头痛患者复发的肠外药物的有效性,并确定预测复发的因素:比较减少急性偏头痛患者复发的肠外用药的有效性,并确定预测复发的因素:背景:许多急性偏头痛患者从急诊出院后,疼痛会复发;严重的复发可能导致患者再次到急诊就诊:方法:我们进行了一项更新至 2023 年的全面文献检索,以确定评估肠外用药对急诊出院急性偏头痛患者复发结果的有效性的随机对照试验。两名独立审稿人完成了研究筛选、质量评估和数据提取。传统的荟萃分析比较了肠外皮质类固醇和安慰剂;频数网络分析评估了直接和间接比较。结果以风险比 (RR) 和 95% 置信区间 (CI) 的形式报告。综述方案已在国际系统综述前瞻性注册中心注册(标识符:CRD42018099493):结果:从 8949 条引文中,共纳入了 53 项研究,涉及 6167 名患者。大多数研究的偏倚风险较高或不明确。与安慰剂相比,皮质类固醇能显著降低复发率(RR 0.67,95% CI 0.52-0.88;I2 = 0%)。接受利多卡因(RR 0.10,95% CI 0.01-0.82)、镇静剂/催眠药(RR 0.33,95% CI 0.14-0.75)、麦角制剂(RR 0.44,95% CI 0.25-0.75)、神经安定剂(RR 0.47,95% CI 0.31-0.71)、阿片类药物(RR 0.58;95% CI 0.35-0.94)或皮质类固醇(RR 0.64,95% CI 0.47-0.86)的复发率明显较低。利多卡因(RR 0.09,95% CI 0.01-0.71)、联合疗法(RR 0.12,95% CI 0.02-0.74)或添加皮质类固醇(RR 0.61,95% CI 0.44-0.84)更有可能减少严重复发。头痛持续时间较长和出院时的残余疼痛与复发率较高明显相关:讨论:皮质类固醇仍是减少复发的一线推荐方案。一些通常用于缓解疼痛的肠外用药,包括麦角制剂、神经安定剂或联合疗法,可有效减少复发;但出于安全考虑,不推荐使用阿片类药物。对于一些研究较少但前景看好的药物,包括利多卡因和异丙酚,还需要进行更多的研究。出院前急诊环境中有效的疼痛控制和头痛持续时间可能会对此类治疗的成功与否起到一定的作用,进一步的研究可以让人们进一步了解某些肠外用药如何以及为何能有效减少复发事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Headache
Headache 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Headache publishes original articles on all aspects of head and face pain including communications on clinical and basic research, diagnosis and management, epidemiology, genetics, and pathophysiology of primary and secondary headaches, cranial neuralgias, and pains referred to the head and face. Monthly issues feature case reports, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, and news items regarding AHS plus medicolegal and socioeconomic aspects of head pain. This is the official journal of the American Headache Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信