Utility of ultrasound in measuring quadriceps muscle thickness in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis: comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Anas Elgenidy, Shady Sapoor, Hasnaa Abdelrhem, Ahmed Said Ali, Saif Sulliman, Sohieb Hedawy, Ayman Elgharori, Hassaan Mady, Wisam Abraheem Hasan, Mohamed Nasser, Esraa Abd Elaal Atta, Mohamed Ghita, Mostafa G Aly, Jana Zschüntzsch
{"title":"Utility of ultrasound in measuring quadriceps muscle thickness in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis: comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Anas Elgenidy, Shady Sapoor, Hasnaa Abdelrhem, Ahmed Said Ali, Saif Sulliman, Sohieb Hedawy, Ayman Elgharori, Hassaan Mady, Wisam Abraheem Hasan, Mohamed Nasser, Esraa Abd Elaal Atta, Mohamed Ghita, Mostafa G Aly, Jana Zschüntzsch","doi":"10.1007/s10157-024-02557-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Muscle wasting, a prevalent issue in hemodialysis patients, is effectively assessed by measuring quadriceps muscle thickness, a crucial health indicator. This meta-analysis integrates findings from various studies on the application of ultrasonography (US) for measuring the thickness of quadriceps muscles in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>We conducted a thorough literature search across PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science up to April 2023. The R software's Meta package was used for mean difference analysis of quadriceps rectus femoris thickness (QRFT) and quadriceps vastus intermedius thickness (QVIT) between hemodialysis patients and healthy controls. All of the patients entered the meta-analysis are Caucasians. Sub-group analyses based on measurement sites and pre- and post-dialysis comparisons were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 15 studies with 1584 patients, a significant decrease in QRFT and QVIT was observed in hemodialysis patients compared to healthy controls (mean difference = 0.40 cm, 95% CI: -0.49 to -0.31 and 0.46 cm, respectively). Right and left QRFT were notably thinner in hemodialysis patients (RT: mean difference = 0.39 cm; LT: mean difference = 0.42 cm). Similarly, right and left QVIT were notably thinner in hemodialysis patients (RT: mean difference = 0.45 cm; LT: mean difference = 0.47 cm). No significant pre- and post-dialysis QRFT differences were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasonography is a reliable, accessible tool for assessing quadriceps muscle thickness in hemodialysis patients, revealing consistent muscle thickness reduction. These findings emphasize the need for routine muscle health monitoring in this population and support ultrasound use for regular assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":10349,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-024-02557-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Muscle wasting, a prevalent issue in hemodialysis patients, is effectively assessed by measuring quadriceps muscle thickness, a crucial health indicator. This meta-analysis integrates findings from various studies on the application of ultrasonography (US) for measuring the thickness of quadriceps muscles in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.

Design and methods: We conducted a thorough literature search across PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science up to April 2023. The R software's Meta package was used for mean difference analysis of quadriceps rectus femoris thickness (QRFT) and quadriceps vastus intermedius thickness (QVIT) between hemodialysis patients and healthy controls. All of the patients entered the meta-analysis are Caucasians. Sub-group analyses based on measurement sites and pre- and post-dialysis comparisons were performed.

Results: Among 15 studies with 1584 patients, a significant decrease in QRFT and QVIT was observed in hemodialysis patients compared to healthy controls (mean difference = 0.40 cm, 95% CI: -0.49 to -0.31 and 0.46 cm, respectively). Right and left QRFT were notably thinner in hemodialysis patients (RT: mean difference = 0.39 cm; LT: mean difference = 0.42 cm). Similarly, right and left QVIT were notably thinner in hemodialysis patients (RT: mean difference = 0.45 cm; LT: mean difference = 0.47 cm). No significant pre- and post-dialysis QRFT differences were found.

Conclusion: Ultrasonography is a reliable, accessible tool for assessing quadriceps muscle thickness in hemodialysis patients, revealing consistent muscle thickness reduction. These findings emphasize the need for routine muscle health monitoring in this population and support ultrasound use for regular assessments.

超声波测量维持性血液透析患者股四头肌厚度的实用性:全面系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:肌肉萎缩是血液透析患者普遍存在的问题,通过测量股四头肌厚度这一重要的健康指标可以有效评估肌肉萎缩。本荟萃分析整合了关于应用超声波成像(US)测量血液透析患者股四头肌厚度的多项研究结果:我们对截至 2023 年 4 月的 PubMed、Scopus、EMBASE、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 和 Web of Science 进行了全面的文献检索。使用 R 软件的 Meta 软件包对血液透析患者和健康对照组的股四头肌股直肌厚度(QRFT)和股四头肌阔中肌厚度(QVIT)进行平均差异分析。参与荟萃分析的所有患者均为白种人。根据测量部位和透析前后的比较进行了分组分析:在 15 项研究的 1584 名患者中,观察到血液透析患者的 QRFT 和 QVIT 与健康对照组相比显著下降(平均差异 = 0.40 厘米,95% CI:分别为 -0.49 至 -0.31 厘米和 0.46 厘米)。血液透析患者的右侧和左侧 QRFT 明显较薄(RT:平均差异 = 0.39 厘米;LT:平均差异 = 0.42 厘米)。同样,血液透析患者的右侧和左侧 QVIT 也明显变薄(RT:平均差异 = 0.45 厘米;LT:平均差异 = 0.47 厘米)。透析前后的 QRFT 无明显差异:结论:超声波检查是评估血液透析患者股四头肌厚度的一种可靠、便捷的工具,可发现肌肉厚度持续减少。这些发现强调了对该人群进行常规肌肉健康监测的必要性,并支持使用超声波进行定期评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Nephrology is a peer-reviewed monthly journal, officially published by the Japanese Society of Nephrology (JSN) to provide an international forum for the discussion of research and issues relating to the study of nephrology. Out of respect for the founders of the JSN, the title of this journal uses the term “nephrology,” a word created and brought into use with the establishment of the JSN (Japanese Journal of Nephrology, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1960). The journal publishes articles on all aspects of nephrology, including basic, experimental, and clinical research, so as to share the latest research findings and ideas not only with members of the JSN, but with all researchers who wish to contribute to a better understanding of recent advances in nephrology. The journal is unique in that it introduces to an international readership original reports from Japan and also the clinical standards discussed and agreed by JSN.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信