To Study the Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Midline Sternotomy in Open Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Prospective Comparative Study.

IF 1.1 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-04 DOI:10.4103/aca.aca_193_23
Ganesh Singh, Sanjay Dhiraaj, Chetna Shamshery, Surendra Kumar Agarwal, Puneet Goyal, Suruchi Ambasta
{"title":"To Study the Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Midline Sternotomy in Open Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Prospective Comparative Study.","authors":"Ganesh Singh, Sanjay Dhiraaj, Chetna Shamshery, Surendra Kumar Agarwal, Puneet Goyal, Suruchi Ambasta","doi":"10.4103/aca.aca_193_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of acute poststernotomy pain after cardiac surgery is 80%1. Pecto-intercostal fascial plane block (PIFB) adjacent to the sternum anesthetizes the anterior cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerves and may provide effective analgesia after sternotomy.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A randomized controlled, double-blinded, prospective comparative trial was conducted at a tertiary care center on patients of midline sternotomy between 18 and 65 years and NYHA Class 2 and 3 for open cardiac surgery with the primary aim to evaluate analgesia on deep breathing after 3 hours of PIFB block bilaterally. A total of 60 patients were enrolled and randomly divided into three groups. PIFB was administered bilaterally before extubation, with 15 ml 0.125% bupivacaine plain (Group B), and bupivacaine+ clonidine 0.25 mcg/kg (Group B+C). Group C did not receive any intervention. All patients received acetaminophen 1 gram three times a day and injectable tramadol 1 mg/kg as a rescue analgesic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were similar among all the groups. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain was statistically lower (P < 0.05) in Groups B and B+C compared to Group C at rest, deep breathing, and coughing at 3, 6, and 12 hours after extubation. NRS on deep breathing in Groups B, B+C, and C was {(2.3, 1.5, 4.4) at 3 hours, (2.3, 1.6, 4.3) at 6 hours, (2.8, 2.1, 3.9) at 12 hrs, and {(4.3, 3.5, 3.6)} at 24 hours after extubation. The peak expiratory flow rate was the highest in Group B. Rescue analgesia was not required in Group B.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PIFB reduces sternotomy pain compared to the control group on deep breathing at 3 hours after block, with delayed requirement of rescue analgesia and improved respiratory mechanics in terms of peak expiratory flow rate at all time points. There is no benefit from adding clonidine.</p>","PeriodicalId":7997,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_193_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The incidence of acute poststernotomy pain after cardiac surgery is 80%1. Pecto-intercostal fascial plane block (PIFB) adjacent to the sternum anesthetizes the anterior cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerves and may provide effective analgesia after sternotomy.

Methodology: A randomized controlled, double-blinded, prospective comparative trial was conducted at a tertiary care center on patients of midline sternotomy between 18 and 65 years and NYHA Class 2 and 3 for open cardiac surgery with the primary aim to evaluate analgesia on deep breathing after 3 hours of PIFB block bilaterally. A total of 60 patients were enrolled and randomly divided into three groups. PIFB was administered bilaterally before extubation, with 15 ml 0.125% bupivacaine plain (Group B), and bupivacaine+ clonidine 0.25 mcg/kg (Group B+C). Group C did not receive any intervention. All patients received acetaminophen 1 gram three times a day and injectable tramadol 1 mg/kg as a rescue analgesic.

Results: Baseline characteristics were similar among all the groups. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain was statistically lower (P < 0.05) in Groups B and B+C compared to Group C at rest, deep breathing, and coughing at 3, 6, and 12 hours after extubation. NRS on deep breathing in Groups B, B+C, and C was {(2.3, 1.5, 4.4) at 3 hours, (2.3, 1.6, 4.3) at 6 hours, (2.8, 2.1, 3.9) at 12 hrs, and {(4.3, 3.5, 3.6)} at 24 hours after extubation. The peak expiratory flow rate was the highest in Group B. Rescue analgesia was not required in Group B.

Conclusion: PIFB reduces sternotomy pain compared to the control group on deep breathing at 3 hours after block, with delayed requirement of rescue analgesia and improved respiratory mechanics in terms of peak expiratory flow rate at all time points. There is no benefit from adding clonidine.

研究超声引导下胸肋间筋膜平面阻滞对开放性心脏手术中线缝合患者的疗效:随机前瞻性比较研究。
背景:心脏手术后胸骨切开术后急性疼痛的发生率为80%1。邻近胸骨的胸骨肋间筋膜面阻滞(PIFB)可麻醉肋间神经前皮支,并可在胸骨切开术后提供有效镇痛:在一家三级医疗中心进行了一项随机对照、双盲、前瞻性比较试验,对象是年龄在18至65岁之间、NYHA分级为2级和3级的开胸心脏手术胸骨中线切开术患者,主要目的是评估双侧PIFB阻滞3小时后深呼吸的镇痛效果。共有 60 名患者入选,并随机分为三组。B组在拔管前进行双侧PIFB阻滞,同时使用15毫升0.125%布比卡因(B组)和布比卡因+ 0.25 mcg/kg 氯尼丁(B+C组)。C 组未接受任何干预。所有患者均服用对乙酰氨基酚 1 克,每天三次,并注射曲马多 1 毫克/千克作为解救镇痛剂:各组的基线特征相似。与 C 组相比,B 组和 B+C 组患者在拔管后 3、6 和 12 小时的静息、深呼吸和咳嗽时的疼痛数字评分量表(NRS)均低于 C 组(P < 0.05)。拔管后 3 小时时,B 组、B+C 组和 C 组深呼吸时的 NRS 分别为{(2.3, 1.5, 4.4);6 小时时,分别为(2.3, 1.6, 4.3);12 小时时,分别为(2.8, 2.1, 3.9);24 小时时,分别为{(4.3, 3.5, 3.6)}。B 组的呼气流量峰值最高。结论:结论:与对照组相比,PIFB 可减轻阻滞后 3 小时深呼吸时的胸骨切开疼痛,延迟了对镇痛抢救的需求,并改善了所有时间点的呼气流速峰值的呼吸力学。加入氯尼丁没有任何益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
147
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia (ACA) is the official journal of the Indian Association of Cardiovascular Thoracic Anaesthesiologists. The journal is indexed with PubMed/MEDLINE, Excerpta Medica/EMBASE, IndMed and MedInd. The journal’s full text is online at www.annals.in. With the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge, we will be publishing articles ‘Ahead of Print’ immediately on acceptance. In addition, the journal would allow free access (Open Access) to its contents, which is likely to attract more readers and citations to articles published in ACA. Authors do not have to pay for submission, processing or publication of articles in ACA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信