3D Semi-Analytical and Numerical Upper-Bound Homogenisation Approaches to the Out-of-Plane Strength Domain of a Running-Bond Masonry Wall

IF 3.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Elodie Donval, Ghazi Hassen, Duc Toan Pham, Patrick de Buhan, Martin Vigroux
{"title":"3D Semi-Analytical and Numerical Upper-Bound Homogenisation Approaches to the Out-of-Plane Strength Domain of a Running-Bond Masonry Wall","authors":"Elodie Donval,&nbsp;Ghazi Hassen,&nbsp;Duc Toan Pham,&nbsp;Patrick de Buhan,&nbsp;Martin Vigroux","doi":"10.1002/nag.3851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present contribution proposes a new semi-analytical homogenisation approach to determine a running-bond masonry wall's in- and out-of-plane strength domain based on the yield design framework. The main novelty of such an approach is that it does not rely on simplifying assumptions such as infinitely thin joints or plane stress state within the blocks, by making use of 3D virtual failure mechanisms in the kinematic approach. The new semi-analytical approach is then compared to a state-of-the-art numerical implementation of the kinematic approach of yield design, relying on semi-definite programming. Several comparisons show a good agreement between the semi-analytical and the numerical approaches and outline the computational efficiency of the semi-analytical approach as well as the fact that it is very well suited for engineering design purposes. Both proposed approaches are then compared to existing approaches based on the limit analysis or yield design framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"48 18","pages":"4469-4490"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/nag.3851","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nag.3851","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present contribution proposes a new semi-analytical homogenisation approach to determine a running-bond masonry wall's in- and out-of-plane strength domain based on the yield design framework. The main novelty of such an approach is that it does not rely on simplifying assumptions such as infinitely thin joints or plane stress state within the blocks, by making use of 3D virtual failure mechanisms in the kinematic approach. The new semi-analytical approach is then compared to a state-of-the-art numerical implementation of the kinematic approach of yield design, relying on semi-definite programming. Several comparisons show a good agreement between the semi-analytical and the numerical approaches and outline the computational efficiency of the semi-analytical approach as well as the fact that it is very well suited for engineering design purposes. Both proposed approaches are then compared to existing approaches based on the limit analysis or yield design framework.

Abstract Image

流水粘结砌体墙平面外强度域的三维半分析和数值上界均质化方法
本论文基于屈服设计框架,提出了一种新的半分析均质化方法,用于确定流水粘结砌体墙的平面内和平面外强度域。这种方法的主要新颖之处在于,它不依赖于简化假设,如无限薄的接缝或砌块内的平面应力状态,而是利用运动学方法中的三维虚拟破坏机制。然后,将新的半分析方法与屈服设计运动学方法的最先进数值实施方法(依赖于半定量编程)进行比较。几项比较显示,半分析方法和数值方法之间的一致性很好,并概述了半分析方法的计算效率,以及它非常适合工程设计目的这一事实。然后,将这两种拟议方法与基于极限分析或屈服设计框架的现有方法进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信