Elodie Donval, Ghazi Hassen, Duc Toan Pham, Patrick de Buhan, Martin Vigroux
{"title":"3D Semi-Analytical and Numerical Upper-Bound Homogenisation Approaches to the Out-of-Plane Strength Domain of a Running-Bond Masonry Wall","authors":"Elodie Donval, Ghazi Hassen, Duc Toan Pham, Patrick de Buhan, Martin Vigroux","doi":"10.1002/nag.3851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present contribution proposes a new semi-analytical homogenisation approach to determine a running-bond masonry wall's in- and out-of-plane strength domain based on the yield design framework. The main novelty of such an approach is that it does not rely on simplifying assumptions such as infinitely thin joints or plane stress state within the blocks, by making use of 3D virtual failure mechanisms in the kinematic approach. The new semi-analytical approach is then compared to a state-of-the-art numerical implementation of the kinematic approach of yield design, relying on semi-definite programming. Several comparisons show a good agreement between the semi-analytical and the numerical approaches and outline the computational efficiency of the semi-analytical approach as well as the fact that it is very well suited for engineering design purposes. Both proposed approaches are then compared to existing approaches based on the limit analysis or yield design framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"48 18","pages":"4469-4490"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/nag.3851","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nag.3851","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The present contribution proposes a new semi-analytical homogenisation approach to determine a running-bond masonry wall's in- and out-of-plane strength domain based on the yield design framework. The main novelty of such an approach is that it does not rely on simplifying assumptions such as infinitely thin joints or plane stress state within the blocks, by making use of 3D virtual failure mechanisms in the kinematic approach. The new semi-analytical approach is then compared to a state-of-the-art numerical implementation of the kinematic approach of yield design, relying on semi-definite programming. Several comparisons show a good agreement between the semi-analytical and the numerical approaches and outline the computational efficiency of the semi-analytical approach as well as the fact that it is very well suited for engineering design purposes. Both proposed approaches are then compared to existing approaches based on the limit analysis or yield design framework.
期刊介绍:
The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.