[Role of CAR-T in multiple myeloma and coordination between referring and treating centers].

Satoshi Yoshihara
{"title":"[Role of CAR-T in multiple myeloma and coordination between referring and treating centers].","authors":"Satoshi Yoshihara","doi":"10.11406/rinketsu.65.1042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors (PIs), and anti-CD38 antibodies have been the three mainstays of myeloma treatment. B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted immunotherapy, including chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), is emerging as another important class of treatment. Two BCMA-targeting CAR-T products, idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel, are approved in Japan, but only ide-cel is available for clinical use. Recently, a randomized phase III study comparing ide-cel with standard therapy in patients with refractory myeloma who had received 2 to 4 prior lines of therapy showed that ide-cel was superior in terms of both response rate and PFS. Based on these results, ide-cel was approved as a third-line therapy. The new availability of bispecific antibodies has also raised new clinical questions regarding how to use CAR-T and BsAbs for each patient, and in what order. Limited data have suggested that favorable responses can be achieved when BsAbs are administered after CAR-T, but responses are suboptimal when CAR-T is administered after BsAbs. Finally, it is important to note that coordination between referring centers and treating centers, including aspects such as timing of patient referral, bridging therapy, and long-term follow-up after CAR-T, is critical to optimization of CAR-T.</p>","PeriodicalId":93844,"journal":{"name":"[Rinsho ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[Rinsho ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11406/rinketsu.65.1042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors (PIs), and anti-CD38 antibodies have been the three mainstays of myeloma treatment. B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted immunotherapy, including chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), is emerging as another important class of treatment. Two BCMA-targeting CAR-T products, idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel, are approved in Japan, but only ide-cel is available for clinical use. Recently, a randomized phase III study comparing ide-cel with standard therapy in patients with refractory myeloma who had received 2 to 4 prior lines of therapy showed that ide-cel was superior in terms of both response rate and PFS. Based on these results, ide-cel was approved as a third-line therapy. The new availability of bispecific antibodies has also raised new clinical questions regarding how to use CAR-T and BsAbs for each patient, and in what order. Limited data have suggested that favorable responses can be achieved when BsAbs are administered after CAR-T, but responses are suboptimal when CAR-T is administered after BsAbs. Finally, it is important to note that coordination between referring centers and treating centers, including aspects such as timing of patient referral, bridging therapy, and long-term follow-up after CAR-T, is critical to optimization of CAR-T.

[CAR-T在多发性骨髓瘤中的作用以及转诊中心和治疗中心之间的协调]。
免疫调节药物(IMiDs)、蛋白酶体抑制剂(PIs)和抗CD38抗体一直是骨髓瘤治疗的三大支柱。B细胞成熟抗原(BCMA)靶向免疫疗法,包括嵌合抗原受体T细胞疗法(CAR-T)和双特异性抗体(BsAbs),正在成为另一种重要的治疗手段。日本已批准了两种以 BCMA 为靶点的 CAR-T 产品,即 idecabtagene vicleucel(ide-cel)和 ciltacabtagene autoleucel,但只有 ide-cel 可用于临床。最近,一项III期随机研究比较了ide-cel和标准疗法,结果显示,ide-cel在应答率和PFS方面均优于标准疗法。基于这些结果,ide-cel 被批准作为三线疗法。新出现的双特异性抗体也提出了新的临床问题,即如何为每位患者使用 CAR-T 和 BsAbs,以及使用的顺序。有限的数据表明,在 CAR-T 后使用 BsAbs 可以获得良好的反应,但在 BsAbs 后使用 CAR-T 则反应不佳。最后,需要注意的是,转诊中心和治疗中心之间的协调,包括患者转诊时机、桥接治疗和 CAR-T 后的长期随访等方面,对于优化 CAR-T 治疗至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信