Impact of Telemedicine Versus In-Person Pediatric Outpatient Type 1 Diabetes Visits on Immediate Glycemic Control: Retrospective Chart Review.

Q2 Medicine
JMIR Diabetes Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.2196/58579
Christopher Ferber, Steven D Mittelman, Tannaz Moin, Holly Wilhalme, Rebecca Hicks
{"title":"Impact of Telemedicine Versus In-Person Pediatric Outpatient Type 1 Diabetes Visits on Immediate Glycemic Control: Retrospective Chart Review.","authors":"Christopher Ferber, Steven D Mittelman, Tannaz Moin, Holly Wilhalme, Rebecca Hicks","doi":"10.2196/58579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes require frequent outpatient evaluation to assess glucose trends, modify insulin doses, and screen for comorbidities. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) provides a detailed glycemic control assessment. Telemedicine has been increasingly used since the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate CGM profile parameter improvement immediately following pediatric outpatient diabetes visits and determine if visit modality impacted these metrics, completion of screening laboratory tests, or diabetic emergency occurrence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A dual-center retrospective review of medical records assessed the CGM metrics time in range and glucose management indicator for pediatric outpatient diabetes visits during 2021. Baseline values were compared with those at 2 and 4 weeks post visit. Rates of completion of screening laboratory tests and diabetic emergencies following visits were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 269 outpatient visits (41.2% telemedicine) were included. Mean time in range increased by 1.63% and 1.35% at 2 and 4 weeks post visit (P=.003 and .01, respectively). Mean glucose management indicator decreased by 0.07% and 0.06% at 2 and 4 weeks post visit (P=.003 and .02, respectively). These improvements in time in range and glucose management indicator were seen across both telemedicine visits and in-person visits without a significant difference. However, patients seen in person were 2.69 times more likely to complete screening laboratory tests (P=.03). Diabetic emergencies occurred too infrequently to analyze.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings demonstrate an immediate improvement in CGM metrics following outpatient visits, regardless of modality. While statistically significant, the magnitude of these changes was small; hence, multiple visits over time would be required to achieve clinically relevant improvement. However, completion of screening laboratory tests was found to be more likely after visits occurring in person. Therefore, we suggest a hybrid approach that allows patient convenience with telemedicine but also incorporates periodic in-person assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":52371,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Diabetes","volume":"9 ","pages":"e58579"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11480684/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/58579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes require frequent outpatient evaluation to assess glucose trends, modify insulin doses, and screen for comorbidities. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) provides a detailed glycemic control assessment. Telemedicine has been increasingly used since the COVID-19 pandemic.

Objective: To investigate CGM profile parameter improvement immediately following pediatric outpatient diabetes visits and determine if visit modality impacted these metrics, completion of screening laboratory tests, or diabetic emergency occurrence.

Methods: A dual-center retrospective review of medical records assessed the CGM metrics time in range and glucose management indicator for pediatric outpatient diabetes visits during 2021. Baseline values were compared with those at 2 and 4 weeks post visit. Rates of completion of screening laboratory tests and diabetic emergencies following visits were determined.

Results: A total of 269 outpatient visits (41.2% telemedicine) were included. Mean time in range increased by 1.63% and 1.35% at 2 and 4 weeks post visit (P=.003 and .01, respectively). Mean glucose management indicator decreased by 0.07% and 0.06% at 2 and 4 weeks post visit (P=.003 and .02, respectively). These improvements in time in range and glucose management indicator were seen across both telemedicine visits and in-person visits without a significant difference. However, patients seen in person were 2.69 times more likely to complete screening laboratory tests (P=.03). Diabetic emergencies occurred too infrequently to analyze.

Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate an immediate improvement in CGM metrics following outpatient visits, regardless of modality. While statistically significant, the magnitude of these changes was small; hence, multiple visits over time would be required to achieve clinically relevant improvement. However, completion of screening laboratory tests was found to be more likely after visits occurring in person. Therefore, we suggest a hybrid approach that allows patient convenience with telemedicine but also incorporates periodic in-person assessment.

远程医疗与面对面儿科 1 型糖尿病门诊对即时血糖控制的影响:回顾病历
背景:患有 1 型糖尿病的儿童和青少年需要经常接受门诊评估,以评估血糖趋势、调整胰岛素剂量并筛查合并症。连续血糖监测(CGM)可提供详细的血糖控制评估。自 COVID-19 大流行以来,远程医疗的应用日益广泛:目的:调查儿童糖尿病门诊就诊后 CGM 血糖曲线参数的改善情况,并确定就诊方式是否会影响这些指标、筛查实验室检查的完成情况或糖尿病急诊的发生率:双中心病历回顾评估了 2021 年期间儿科糖尿病门诊的 CGM 指标范围内时间和血糖管理指标。基线值与就诊后 2 周和 4 周的值进行了比较。结果:结果:共纳入 269 次门诊(41.2% 为远程医疗)。就诊后 2 周和 4 周,平均在诊时间分别增加了 1.63% 和 1.35%(P=.003 和 0.01)。就诊后 2 周和 4 周,平均血糖管理指标分别下降了 0.07% 和 0.06%(P=.003 和 .02)。在远程医疗就诊和面对面就诊时,血糖控制在范围内的时间和血糖管理指标都有所改善,但没有显著差异。不过,亲自就诊的患者完成筛查实验室测试的可能性要高出 2.69 倍(P=.03)。糖尿病急诊发生率太低,无法进行分析:我们的研究结果表明,无论采用哪种方式,门诊就诊后 CGM 指标都会立即得到改善。虽然在统计学上有意义,但这些变化的幅度很小;因此,需要长期多次就诊才能实现临床相关的改善。不过,我们发现亲自就诊后更有可能完成筛查化验。因此,我们建议采用一种混合方法,既能通过远程医疗为患者提供方便,又能结合定期的面对面评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Diabetes
JMIR Diabetes Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信