Healthcare professionals' experience with nutritional care beyond formal quality systems — A qualitative study

Abstract

Background

Numerous formal strategies, screening tools, and interventions have been used to prevent malnutrition in long-term care patients. Despite these efforts, the proportion of screened patients is low, and a large proportion are malnourished. Previous research has revealed that healthcare professionals use a broad approach in their nutritional care but has also emphasised the need for further investigation into these approaches.

Objective

To explore how healthcare professionals working in long-term care experience and apply nutritional care.

Design

A descriptive, exploratory, qualitative design containing 240 h of participant observation, 12 focus groups and 2 individual interviews.

Setting(s)

Twelve nursing homes and home care units in three Norwegian municipalities.

Participants

Participant observation of interactions between healthcare professionals and patients. Forty-three registered nurses participated in focus group or individual interviews.

Methods

The data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

Results

The analysis identified three themes: The first theme, limited significance of nutritional screening, showed that healthcare professionals experienced the limited value of nutritional screening, as it often did not capture patients' nutritional challenges. They also perceived nutritional screening as unsuitable for patients at the end of their lives, those with overweight-related complications, or undergoing rehabilitation. In addition, nutritional screening was perceived as something healthcare professionals did for their managers or administrators, not because it was crucial to providing good nutritional care. The second theme, provision of individualised food, captures the healthcare professionals' efforts in adapting and preparing food according to the patient's preferences. Facilitation to enable patients to make individual food choices and the use of food cards or lists were two approaches to individualising nutrition care. The third theme, making meals more than about food, elucidated how healthcare professionals used meals to help patients cope with their situations and experience social belonging. Conversations about or around meals were used to provide patients with a sense of belonging to their past or present situation. The meals were also used as a diversion strategy for patients with unrest, as arenas for daily activity training, and for meaningful social interactions between patients around the tables.

Conclusions

Nutritional screening and prevention of malnutrition are only one part of healthcare professionals' nutritional care. Individualised food and meals that create coping, a sense of belonging, and social experiences are equally important parts of their care. Emphasising healthcare professional's person-centred approach to nutritional care would be beneficial, as it could strengthen and further develop long-term nutritional care services.