Evaluation of a Primary Care-Integrated Mobile Health Intervention to Monitor between-Visit Asthma Symptoms.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1788978
Jorge A Sulca Flores, Anuj K Dalal, Jessica Sousa, Dinah Foer, Jorge A Rodriguez, Savanna Plombon, David W Bates, Adriana Arcia, Robert S Rudin
{"title":"Evaluation of a Primary Care-Integrated Mobile Health Intervention to Monitor between-Visit Asthma Symptoms.","authors":"Jorge A Sulca Flores, Anuj K Dalal, Jessica Sousa, Dinah Foer, Jorge A Rodriguez, Savanna Plombon, David W Bates, Adriana Arcia, Robert S Rudin","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1788978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong> This study aimed to evaluate implementation of a digital remote symptom monitoring intervention that delivered weekly symptom questionnaires and included the option to receive nurse callbacks via a mobile app for asthma patients in primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Research questions were structured by the NASSS (Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-up Spread, and Sustainability) framework. Quantitative and qualitative methods assessed scalability of the electronic health record (EHR)-integrated app intervention implemented in a 12-month randomized controlled trial. Data sources included patient asthma control questionnaires; app usage logs; EHRs; and interviews and discussions with patients, primary care providers (PCPs), and nurses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> We included app usage data from 190 patients and interview data from 21 patients and several clinician participants. Among 190 patients, average questionnaire completion rate was 72.3% and retention was 78.9% (i.e., 150 patients continued to use the app at the end of the trial period). App use was lower among Hispanic and younger patients and those with fewer years of education. Of 1,185 nurse callback requests offered to patients. Thirty-three (2.8%) were requested. Of 84 PCP participants, 14 (16.7%) accessed the patient-reported data in the EHR. Analyses showed that the intervention was appropriate for all levels of asthma control; had no major technical barriers; was desirable and useful for patient treatment; involved achievable tasks for patients; required modest role changes for clinicians; and was a minimal burden on the organization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> A clinically integrated symptom monitoring intervention has strong potential for sustained adoption. Inequitable adoption remains a concern. PCP use of patient-reported data during visits could improve intervention adoption but may not be required for patient benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11446627/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788978","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives:  This study aimed to evaluate implementation of a digital remote symptom monitoring intervention that delivered weekly symptom questionnaires and included the option to receive nurse callbacks via a mobile app for asthma patients in primary care.

Methods:  Research questions were structured by the NASSS (Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-up Spread, and Sustainability) framework. Quantitative and qualitative methods assessed scalability of the electronic health record (EHR)-integrated app intervention implemented in a 12-month randomized controlled trial. Data sources included patient asthma control questionnaires; app usage logs; EHRs; and interviews and discussions with patients, primary care providers (PCPs), and nurses.

Results:  We included app usage data from 190 patients and interview data from 21 patients and several clinician participants. Among 190 patients, average questionnaire completion rate was 72.3% and retention was 78.9% (i.e., 150 patients continued to use the app at the end of the trial period). App use was lower among Hispanic and younger patients and those with fewer years of education. Of 1,185 nurse callback requests offered to patients. Thirty-three (2.8%) were requested. Of 84 PCP participants, 14 (16.7%) accessed the patient-reported data in the EHR. Analyses showed that the intervention was appropriate for all levels of asthma control; had no major technical barriers; was desirable and useful for patient treatment; involved achievable tasks for patients; required modest role changes for clinicians; and was a minimal burden on the organization.

Conclusion:  A clinically integrated symptom monitoring intervention has strong potential for sustained adoption. Inequitable adoption remains a concern. PCP use of patient-reported data during visits could improve intervention adoption but may not be required for patient benefits.

评估初级保健集成移动医疗干预措施,以监测两次就诊之间的哮喘症状。
研究目的本研究旨在评估数字化远程症状监测干预措施的实施情况,该干预措施每周提供一次症状调查问卷,并可通过手机应用接收护士回访,适用于初级保健中的哮喘患者:研究问题由 NASSS(不采用、放弃、推广和可持续性)框架构建。定量和定性方法评估了在为期 12 个月的随机对照试验中实施的电子健康记录(EHR)集成应用干预的可扩展性。数据来源包括患者哮喘控制问卷、应用程序使用日志、电子病历以及与患者、初级保健提供者(PCP)和护士的访谈和讨论:我们收集了 190 名患者的应用程序使用数据以及 21 名患者和几名临床医生的访谈数据。在 190 名患者中,平均问卷完成率为 72.3%,保留率为 78.9%(即 150 名患者在试用期结束后继续使用该应用程序)。西班牙裔和年轻患者以及受教育年限较低的患者对应用程序的使用率较低。在为患者提供的 1,185 次护士回电请求中,有 33 次(2.8%)要求护士回电。有 33 人(2.8%)提出了请求。在 84 名初级保健医生参与者中,14 人(16.7%)访问了电子病历中的患者报告数据。分析表明,该干预措施适用于所有哮喘控制水平;没有重大技术障碍;对患者治疗理想且有用;涉及患者可完成的任务;对临床医生的角色要求变化不大;对机构造成的负担很小:结论:临床综合症状监测干预措施具有持续采用的巨大潜力。结论:临床综合症状监测干预措施具有持续采用的巨大潜力,但不公平采用仍是一个令人担忧的问题。初级保健医生在就诊过程中使用患者报告的数据可提高干预措施的采用率,但可能并不是患者获益的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信