Lars Kollmann, Annette Thurner, Alexander Dimitri Miras, Florian Seyfried
{"title":"Simultaneous treatment of large hiatal hernias during Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: technical considerations and outcome.","authors":"Lars Kollmann, Annette Thurner, Alexander Dimitri Miras, Florian Seyfried","doi":"10.1007/s13304-024-02017-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the preferred surgical option for patients with proven gastroesophageal reflux disease and obesity grade ≥ II (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Data on simultaneous treatment of larger hiatal hernias during RYGB are scarce. From 2012 until 2022, data from all consecutive patients undergoing gastric bypass procedures were collected and retrospectively analyzed. The characteristics and surgical outcomes of patients undergoing RYGB alone (RYGBa) versus RYGB with simultaneous treatment of a large hiatal hernia (RYGB-HH) were compared. Out of 573 patients who received RYGB, we identified 12 simultaneously treated for large hiatal hernia. The characteristics of RYGB-HH versus RYGBa patients were higher age (55 vs. 44 years; p = 0.004) and lower BMI (39.2 vs. 46.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; p = 0.001). Duration of surgery in the RYGB-HH group was longer (144 min vs. 98 min; p < 0.001), while complications > Clavien-Dindo II were similar compared to the RYGBa group (8.3 vs. 9.4%, p = 0.56). Length of stay did not differ among the groups (4 vs. 5.5 days, p = 0.051). At a median follow-up of 12 months, there was no clinical recurrence of hiatal hernia in the RYGB-HH group. Simultaneous treatment of large hiatal hernias during Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery prolongs operation time but seems feasible and safe in the hands of experienced surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2973-2976"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11628427/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-02017-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the preferred surgical option for patients with proven gastroesophageal reflux disease and obesity grade ≥ II (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2). Data on simultaneous treatment of larger hiatal hernias during RYGB are scarce. From 2012 until 2022, data from all consecutive patients undergoing gastric bypass procedures were collected and retrospectively analyzed. The characteristics and surgical outcomes of patients undergoing RYGB alone (RYGBa) versus RYGB with simultaneous treatment of a large hiatal hernia (RYGB-HH) were compared. Out of 573 patients who received RYGB, we identified 12 simultaneously treated for large hiatal hernia. The characteristics of RYGB-HH versus RYGBa patients were higher age (55 vs. 44 years; p = 0.004) and lower BMI (39.2 vs. 46.9 kg/m2; p = 0.001). Duration of surgery in the RYGB-HH group was longer (144 min vs. 98 min; p < 0.001), while complications > Clavien-Dindo II were similar compared to the RYGBa group (8.3 vs. 9.4%, p = 0.56). Length of stay did not differ among the groups (4 vs. 5.5 days, p = 0.051). At a median follow-up of 12 months, there was no clinical recurrence of hiatal hernia in the RYGB-HH group. Simultaneous treatment of large hiatal hernias during Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery prolongs operation time but seems feasible and safe in the hands of experienced surgeons.
期刊介绍:
Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future.
Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts.
Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.